Suicidalism | Armed and Dangerous(window.slotbydup=window.slotbydup || []).push({
id: '2014386',
container: s,
size: '234,60',
display: 'inlay-fix'
&&|&&0次下载&&|&&总704页&&|
您的计算机尚未安装Flash，点击安装&
如需下载到电脑，请使用积分（）
1人评价704页
1人评价638页
0人评价8页
1人评价15页
0人评价76页
所需积分：（友情提示：所有文档均可免费全文预览！下载之前请务必先预览阅读，以免误下载造成积分浪费！）
（多个标签用逗号分隔）
文不对题，内容与标题介绍不符
广告内容或内容过于简单
文档乱码或无法正常显示
若此文档涉嫌侵害了您的权利，请参照说明。
评价文档：The American Conservative
& God Is Not Found Through ScienceThe American Conservative & Print
Baylor’s
[1] to Eric Metaxas’s much-discussed Wall Street Journal column ( [2]). From Beckwith’s piece:
But now, Metaxas argues, that narrative is becoming obsolete: current findings in science show us that the arising of life in the universe is so improbable that it becomes increasingly clear that some master intelligence is probably behind it.
But is this the right way to think about God as Creator? Is the rational basis for believing in His existence really dependent on the deliverances of modern science? Should one calibrate the depth of one’s faith on the basis of what researchers tell us about the plausibility of the “God hypothesis” in recent issues of the leading peer-reviewed science journals? The answer to all three question is no, since God is not a scientific hypothesis. For this reason, it is equally true that advances in our scientific knowledge cannot in principle count against the existence of God.
This is because God – as understood by the Catholic Church and by most other theistic traditions – is not a being in the universe, a superior agent whose existence we postulate in order to explain some natural phenomenon, but rather, Being Itself, that which all contingent reality depends for its existence.
I am not philosophically sophisticated enough to respond on this point, but my view is this: order in creation does not prove God, but it is a sign pointing to God. Even if God’s existence could be proved, even the devil believes in God, but rejects Him. God desires to live in communion with us. Recognizing His existence with the intellect is only a start. He wants not our minds, but our hearts. In Kierkegaardian terms, God is a subjective truth — a truth that can only be known by appropriating it with the most passionate inwardness. We don’t know God like we know the Second Law of T we know God like we know the love of our father.
Science can be a signpost on the way to God, but no more than that. A God whose existence can be proven is not God.}