Access denied | draxe.com used Cloudflare to restrict access
Please enable cookies.
What happened?
The owner of this website (draxe.com) has banned your access based on your browser's signature (3f9c5a12aead934e-ua98).Start by marking “Wait for You (Wait for You, #1)” as Want to Read:
Want to Read
Want to Read
Currently Reading
Enlarge cover
Want to Read
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
Wait for You by J. Lynn.
It’s the wrong book
It’s the wrong edition
Details (if other):
Wait for You
(Goodreads Author)
switch to:Welcome to visit our city whenever . A you are convenient B you are convenience C it’s convenient to you D it’s convenience for you 题目和参考答案——精英家教网——
暑假天气热？在家里学北京名师课程，
& 题目详情
Welcome to visit our city whenever _______. 　 A you are convenient　　　　　　　 B you are convenience 　 C it’s convenient to you　　　　　　　　 D it’s convenience for you &
练习册系列答案
科目：高中英语
来源：必修二导学英语译林 译林版
M：Hi, Jane．It’s nice to see you again．I heard that you went to the US during the v　　1　　．
W：Yes．I went to New York to attend a summer c　　2　　 in English．
M：Wow．You were l　　3　　．How long did you stay there?
W：About 50 days．I went there on July 5th and came back on A　　4　　 25th．
M：How about the course?
W：The course was very good．The teachers were nice．They taught us to listen, speak, read and write in English, but it was mostly s　　5　　．One interesting thing I found was that the American classes are different from o　　6　　 here because the students have a lot more f　　7　　 and s　　8　　．You can sit anywhere you like in the classroom．You can ask the teachers questions at any time during the class, and you are welcome to s　　9　　 your ideas with the class．I really like this kind of class．
M：How interesting! Maybe our teachers should t　　10　　 that．
科目：高中英语
来源：上海市学年度高一第一学期期中考试
题型：阅读理解
CNew at ESL go.com
Learning ESL
Teaching ESL
&&& July 19, 2006—I mised our 3-year anniversary(周年纪念日) by a few days, but it’s here: ESL go.com has a button to click. At the top-left of this page click on the button to get information you need most. I’ve been testing this for a while, but that doesn’t mean it’s perfect. If you notice any problems, please email me at .
&&& ESL go has a new language directory.
&&& July 9—ESL go.com has 45 free online English classes, including online ESL writing classes.
&&& June 20—ESL go.com has 42 free online English classes, divided into lessons for beginners, intermediate(中级的) lessons, and advanced(高级的) lessons.
March 4—I’ve added to the free English practice forums(论坛).
March 4—I’ve added new role-plays to the ESL speaking activities.
January 13, 2004—I’ve added the Study ESL in American class.
January 13, 2004—I’ve updated(更新) the teaching ESL lesson plans.
&&& December 27—ESL go.com has won its first award and the site map is almost up to date. ESL go.com consists of about 300 web pages.
&&& November 21—I’ve made a free reciprocal(互惠的) links information page to help increase link popularity.
October 15—I’ve added the free online ESL business class list.
October 15—I’ve aded to the teaching English as a second language resources.
&&& June 1, 2003—I’ve made ESL go.com public. Please invite your friends to join the ESL go.com English as a second language learning community and help me improve the site by e-mailing me your suggestions.
49. What does “ESL” stand for?A. English as a SecondLanguage.&&&&&&&&&&&&B. English Speaking Lessons.C. English StudyLessons.&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&D. E-mailing Suggestions Lessons.50. When was ESL go.com first invented?A. July 19,2006.&&&&&& B. June 20,2006.&&&&& C. January 13, 2004.&& D. June,1, 2003.51. Where can you find this passage?A. OnTV.&&&&&&&&&&&& B.On a website.&&&&& C. In amagazine.&&&&& D. In a newspaper.52. According to the passage, which of thefollowing in NOT true?A. You are welcome to drop the author aline to help him improve the website.B. People who want to learn English throughESL go.com must pay for the lessons.C. It seems that the author is proud of ESLgo.com.D. ESL go.com go.com offers varieties ofEnglish classes at different levels.&
科目：高中英语
来源：天津市河西区2010届高三第一次模拟（英语）
题型：阅读理解
Welcome to Financial Aid Need Estimator! This free service can help you plan more effectively to meet college costs. The Financial Aid Need Estimator allows you to figure out your family costs at specific intitutions by taking you through two steps.Step 1:during the first step, the Financial Aid Need Estimator will help you estimate how much you and your family will be expected to pay.Step 2:Using the second step, you may estimate the costs of attending specific institution. Your results will show your results will show your eligibility(合格) for financial aid based on both your expected family costs and the costs of attending the institution you selected. By selecting another institution, you may repeat these calculations for as many institutions as you wish without entering your personal information.The Financial Aid Need Estimator does not ask you to identify yourself and will not keep your personal information.Because& international students are not eligible for federal need-based financial aid program results from the Financial Aid Need Estimator will apply only to students who are the U citizens.41.The result of calculation you get from the Financial Aid Need Estimator will&&&&& .A.help you get the financial aid B.provide database for official resultsC.help you meet your college costsD.show your eligibility for financial aid42.The Financial Aid Need Estimator is reliable because&&&&&&& .A.it is controlled by governmentB.it uses the same formula as the government’s official resultsC.it can make sure of its accuracyD.it provides good services free of charge43.Who will be most interested in the passage?A.The Us students who want to apply for financial aid.B.The international students who have financial difficulty.C.The US students who want to go to college.D.The international students who want further study.44. The Financial Aid Need Estimator may mainly consider&&&&& .A.the college you want to go toB.the accuracy of the information you provideC.family costs and college costsD.the application for financial aid45.The purpose of writing this passage is probably to&&&&& .A.tell the possible ways to get financial aid B.tell who will the eligible for financial aid C.introduce the financial Aid Need EstimatorD.introduce the financial aid to college students
科目：高中英语
来源：2013届安徽省绩中高二12月联考英语题
题型：填空题
任务型读写. 请认真阅读下列短文，并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入恰当的单词。注意：每个空格只填一个单词。（共10小题；每小题1分，满分10分）If you are asked to chair ameeting, remember the following six golden rules for meeting management.1. Always start the meeting ontime If you begin on time, group memberswho show up late will realize the value of time. Beginning on time reflects theskill as an effective time manager and sets an example for others to follow.2. Select a note-taker or arrangeto have the meeting audio-taped You may need to refer back to anissue that was discussed during the meeting at a later date. Goodrecord-keeping is a sign of a good meeting manager as well.3. Learn to listen So many times we think we aregoing to say and, in the process, block out important points that other groupmembers may be contributing. Additionally, we often hear only what we want tohear, rather than really listen to other people. Meetings that arecharacterized by effective listening are successful meetings.4. Keep the discussion on track Many times important issues canget sidetracked in a meeting, especially when everyone has a different opinionabout the topic. If an unexpected conflict develops once the meeting is inprogress, either appoint a subcommittee to look into the problem, or ask the participantsinvolved in the conflict to meet with you after the meeting. Doing so will helpkeep the discussion on track and minimize (减少) the chances of wasting participants’ time of great value.5. Give everyone an opportunityto be heard Some people tend to controlmeetings, whereas others wait to be asked their opinions. As the leader of themeeting, you need to keep an open mind and make sure everyone feels welcome tocontribute and express ideas without criticism.6. End on time If you said the meeting wouldlast no longer than one hour, make sure the meeting lasts for only one hour.Running late with a meeting makes members late for other appointments,increases the chances that the members will mentally leave the meeting andreduces your reliability as an effective meeting manager.&Advice on how to 1.&&&&&&a meeting
Start the meeting on time.
2.&&&&&& &the skill and set an example.
Select a note-taker or 3.&&&&&& &the meeting.
Need to refer to an issue4.&&&&&
Learn to listen.
Listen5.&&&&&& &to make sure it is a successful meeting.
Keep the6.&&&&& &on track
Minimize the chances of wasting participants’ 7.&&&&&& &time.
Give everyone an 8.&&&&&& &to be heard
Make everyone feel 9.&&&&&& &to speak.
End on time.
10.&&&&&& &your reliability.
科目：高中英语
来源：学年内蒙古高一下学期期末考试英语题
题型：完型填空
&Mom, Dad, I’m going to college! Can you believe it? I never thought itcould happen. &16 &middle school and part of high school, I &17&to keep up. I was not a bad student，but I just didn’t understand &18 &they were teaching because Ihave a learning &19 . I wanted to show everyone I could graduateand go to &20 &. I wanted to make something of myself, and &21&I wasn’t a failure. 22 &the time came to choose acollege, I wasn’t sure which would be the bestfor me. I knew I didn’t &23 &to go toa big school, which narrowed (缩小) my &24 &to a small college which could be &&&25for me with a learning disability. I looked in Florida and found threeschools. I &26 &two, but they just didn’t &27 &. Then I visited Beacon College. Beaconis mainly for students who have learning disabilities and it has small classes.Theday when I was &28 &by Beacon College was the happiest day ofmy life. I received the call from the school &29 &me I wasaccepted just as I was sitting down for dinner. My family was so &30 ,and I was ready to pack that night and move to Florida. The expectation ofgoing to college &31 &the rest of my senior year.Thecloser the time came, the more nervous I became about being in a(n) &32place. Finally my parents and I packed the car and &33 &Florida.After a two-day drive, we arrived. “Welcome to Beacon College! It isso nice to see you!” I heard &34 &fromthe teachers and students, as we were introduced. I felt so 35 to hearthose cheerful voices. I knew I had found a perfect（理想的）school. I had found myhome for the next four years.1.A.During&&&&&&B. Through&&&& C. Until&&&&&&&&&&& D.Under&&& 2.A. struggled&&&&& B.started&&&&& C. forgot&& && D.turned3.A. how&&&&&&&&&&& B.that&&&&&&&& C. why&&&&&&&&& D.what4. A. experience&&&&&&& B.advantage&&&&&&& C. disability&&&&&& D.habit5. A. work &&&&&&&& B.college&&&&& C. hospital&&&& D.home6. A. believe&&&&&& B.prove&&&&&&&&&&& C. feel&&&&&&& D.imagine7. A. Because&&&&&& B.After&&&&&&&&&&& C. When&&&& D.Before8. A. want&&&&&&&&& B.manage&&&&&& C. decide&&&&&& D.refuse9.A. plans&&&&&&&&& B.decisions&&&&&&& C. choices&&&&& D.purposes10. A. honorable&&&&&&& B.imaginable&& C. suitable D. comfortable11. A. expected&&&& B.left&&&&&&&& C. visited&&&&& D.dreamed12. A. work&&&&&&&& B.fit&&&&&&&&& C. match&&&&&&& D.satisfy13.A. asked&&&&&&&& B.invited &&&& C. admitted&&&& D.attracted14. A. telling&&&&&&&&& B.warning&&&&& C. advising D. reminding15. A. worried&&&&& B.surprised&&&&&&& C. frightened&& D.excited16.A. stopped&&&&&& B.lasted&&&&&&&&&& C. saw&&&&&&&&& D.held17. A. old&&&&&&&&& B.famous&&&&&& C. familiar&&&& D.new18. A. cared for&&&&&&& B.looked for&& C. headed for & D. asked for19.A. day and night &&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&B.over and over& C. more or less &&&&& &D. upand down20.A. warm&&&&&&&&& B.cold &&&&&&&&&&& C. sad&&&&&&&&& D.sorry&
精英家教网新版app上线啦！用app只需扫描书本条形码就能找到作业，家长给孩子检查作业更省心，同学们作业对答案更方便，扫描上方二维码立刻安装！
请输入姓名
请输入手机号Is the Google Home the Voice-Controlled Speaker for You?: Reviews by Wirecutter | A New York Times Company
Your guides
Grant Clauser
Brent Butterworth
In the growing world of voice-controlled smart speakers, Google has thrown down the gauntlet with its introduction of the , a Wi-Fi speaker, digital assistant, and smart-home controller similar to . The Google Home brings Google’s search and voice-control expertise to the category, making this device especially compelling for people who have already entrusted their digital lives to the Google ecosystem.
Google’s wireless speaker, digital assistant, and smart-home controller looks better than its biggest competition, reliably responds to most voice queries, offers solid multiroom audio, and sounds pretty good.
biggest promises concern its voice-activated search functions, its Google-integration skills, and its music abilities. On search, it relies obviously on Google, which gives it a depth that other voice-search systems like Amazon’s Alexa or Apple’s Siri can’t match, although they’re not actually .
Because they’re such similar devices, it’s impossible to avoid comparing the Google Home directly with the . In fact, the two devices are so alike that it’s tempting to think of the Home as a copycat, yet that viewpoint shortchanges all the ways in which they’re different. As of November 2017, Google Home can understand , which the Echo still can’t do. To find out how good a digital assistant, music player, and smart-home controller the Google Home is, we spent two weeks trying all its features, comparing it against Amazon’s Echo where appropriate. We also enlisted the help of The Wirecutter’s Los Angeles audio experts—Brent Butterworth, Lauren Dragan, and Geoff Morrison—to .
Expand all
If you are already invested in the Google ecosystem and want a voice-controlled speaker for listening to music or controlling smart-home devices, the Google Home is an easy recommendation. Despite being new to the game compared with Amazon’s Echo, the Home feels surprisingly polished and complete, both in design and abilities.
One of the advantages the Home offers over existing smart speakers is the ability to track the context of your queries based on previous inputs. For example, if you ask “Who wrote this song?” and then follow that up with “When were they born?” the Home would know to give you the birthday of the songwriter. However, in our time with the device, we didn’t find much use for that feature.
Pull QuoteThe Home is a great smart speaker for early adopters who already use Google’s services, but waiting to buy to see how it improves over time wouldn’t hurt.
The Home’s integrations with Google services, such as Calendar or Keep, rely on your personal account information. Thanks to a recent update, the device can now work with multiple Google accounts and recognize users’ voices.
The Echo, with Alexa, on the other hand, uses a single Amazon account, but Amazon Prime accounts are typically shared by a family, so unless you have multiple Prime accounts in your household and use the Echo for Amazon shopping, you shouldn’t run into any conflicts.
Amazon’s Alexa has a healthy head start in smart-home integrations, but the Home already works with Philips Hue lights, the Nest Learning Thermostat, and Samsung’s SmartThings hub (which connects to a variety of other Z-Wave devices), so it’s off to a decent start with more to come, according to Google. Overall the Home is a great smart speaker for early adopters who already use Google’s services, but waiting to buy to see how it improves over time wouldn’t hurt.
Amazon also provides more device options for specific uses than Google does right now. Currently you have three Echo models to choose from: the original Echo, the smaller Dot (aimed at people who want several units around the house, or for use with other speakers), and the more portable Tap (which lets you take Alexa out into the yard). Alexa works identically on all of them. Our comparisons here, unless otherwise noted, are with the original Echo, but our findings with regard to the Alexa voice-control system should apply across the line.
Finally, there’s the issue of looks. If the black tower of the Echo seems a little too goth for your design tastes, you’ll like the Home better. In addition to its curvy shape, another attractive feature is its replaceable base (actually the speaker grill cover), for which you have seven color options to suit your taste.
The Google Home uses Google Assistant, the voice-recognition system that’s also found on the new Google Pixel phone. The Home includes two built-in far-field microphones that are always listening in on your conversations, ready to leap into action when it hears the right trigger words. The Home will respond when you address it with either “Hey Google” or “OK Google” but not just plain “Google,” so you won’t accidentally trigger the device when you’re casually discussing your favorite Google searches over breakfast.
No buttons, dials, or switches mar the Home’s design, though a microphone mute button is hidden in the back. When you query it, four color LEDs light up to let you know that it hears you. The top of the devic to turn the volume up or down, you touch it on its head and swipe your finger in a circle clockwise or counterclockwise while a ring of white LEDs indicates the volume level. We found the touch-sensitive top a little awkward to operate, preferring the Echo’s buttons and dial, but a person could get used to it.
Compared with the look of the Echo (Left), the Home’s design is more living-room friendly.
Photo: Grant Clauser
The Google Home’s main advantage over the Echo and Alexa is, well, Google. On simple information searches, the Home does a little better, offers a bit more contextual information, and usually gives a longer (though not necessarily more informative) answer. When we asked the two devices about the weather one morning, the Home reported that it would be “partly sunny,” while the Echo indicated “intermittent clouds.” When we asked what the smartest dog was, the Home said it was the collie, while the Echo kept silent, probably out of respect for a hound dog that happened to be in the room. When we asked what the best Bluetooth speaker was, the Home had no answer, while the Echo, unsurprisingly, suggested a model and asked if it should order that speaker from Amazon right at that moment. Both can do math, tell you the population of China, and state how many teaspoons are in a cup. Google is better if you ask how to roast a chicken or what wine goes with steak, but you can find more than 20
about cooking and another 20 for wine fans.
Google Assistant has some context awareness when you ask questions. For instance, after you ask “Hey Google, when did the Sex Pistols form?” and receive your answer, you can follow up with “Hey Google, who was the lead singer?” without having to say “Sex Pistols” again. (You’ll still have to say “Hey Google” every time.)
The Home’s app, like the Echo’s, is mostly for setup, though you will need it for things like shopping lists.
One of the expectations of a Google digital assistant is that it works with Google’s online services, but in this regard it falls short. You can set alarms and timers, and even schedule recurring alarms. You can ask the Home to translate a phrase from English to another language. You can ask what’s on your calendar, but you can’t add things to it, which is surprising because you can do that with the Echo. You can add items to Google Keep by adding things to the Home’s shopping list, which will also show up on Keep. Currently, however, you have no way to create a to-do list other than using Keep, nor can you ask Google to read or create email or to make a Google Voice phone call. Google Assistant uses the intelligence of Google Maps to give you an address or a distance to a location, as well as to let you know what traffic conditions are, but currently it can’t give you directions. These are all things we’re told are on Google’s own to-do list, so we expect Google Assistant to evolve over time. , Google announced that users will be able to add calendar events, set reminders, and make outgoing Google Voice calls to the US and C we’ll test those improvements as they roll out this summer.
If you buy the Google Home for music, you have several music services to choose from. First off, all Home owners get access to Google Play Music (free), Pandora (free and paid accounts), Spotify (paid accounts only), TuneIn for Internet radio, and YouTube Music (paid accounts only). Within the Home app you can select which service your system defaults to, but in use you can always specify which service you want the Home to access. Google’s free Play Music service isn’t as user-friendly as Amazon’s Prime Music for Alexa (which requires a $100-a-year Prime membership). It’s more like Pandora, in that you get mixes based on your artist or track request, rather than music solely by that artist. And after , the Home is now a Bluetooth speaker, so you can stream music from your phone, just as you can do with the Echo (and the Tap, but not the Dot).
The Home can also work as a key part of a multiroom audio system when you combine it with a Chromecast wireless media streamer (you have three of them to choose from: , , and ). The Chromecast devices allow you to stream music or video to another device such as a powered speaker, an audio system, or a TV, and control it with your phone. Google Assistant can play the same music through all units simultaneously or different music in each room. In this way, the Google offering behaves more like a Sonos system than the Echo and Alexa do.
We tested the multiroom feature using one Home and one Chromecast Audio. With the Audio plugged into a TV, we were able to tell the Home to play music on the TV and to play the same music on both the TV and the Home at the same time, essentially creating a multiroom music experience similar to that of Sonos. Echo/Alexa owners can add multiples of the cheaper Echo Dot to their existing Bluetooth speakers or audio system, but the units won’t play the same music in every room, and you can’t ask the Echo in the kitchen to play music via the Dot in the living room—all of those restrictions make the Echo arrangement ineffective as a multiroom-audio system. Adding Chromecasts throughout your home costs less than buying multiple Sonos speakers, too, though Sonos works with more music services and has an easier-to-use app (and soon will be Alexa compatible).
In our listening tests, we found the Home to be a decent speaker for rooms such as kitchens, dens, or bedrooms for casual listening, but it is not a speaker for critical listening, or for entertaining a roomful of people at a party.
To find out how the Home and the Echo compare in sound quality, Wirecutter audio expert Brent Butterworth set up some blind-listening tests and borrowed the critical ears of our Los Angeles–based audio editors, Geoff Morrison and Lauren Dragan. We also ran some lab measurements to get a clearer idea of the devices’ technical performance and to better test how well the microphone arrays and voice-recognition systems separated the user’s voice from other sounds.
Complicating our blind test was the fact that the Google Home plays only material sourced through the Internet, which meant Brent would have to use voice commands to cue up the music for the test. Of course, the voice commands would reveal the speakers’ identities, so Geoff and Lauren listened to pink noise through
noise-isolating headphones while Brent told the speakers which tunes to play. On top of that, even though the speakers were hidden behind thin black fabric, the listeners would have been able to identify the speakers as their flashing lights shone through the material. Thus, Brent insisted that Geoff and Lauren each wear a special pair of “blind-testing glasses”—sunglasses covered with painter’s tape. The listeners were so well isolated that when the music started, he had to clap loudly to signal the listeners to remove the headphones. The two speakers’ coarse volume steps made it impossible to match their listening levels perfectly, but Brent was able to get the match within 0.43 decibel, which is reasonably close.
Lauren waits patiently with her vision and hearing temporarily impaired while Brent tells the Echo and the Home which songs to play.
Photo: Brent Butterworth
Geoff, Lauren, and Brent all ended up describing the sound of the two speakers much the same way. It was a Goldilocks-style dilemma: The Echo seemed to have almost no bass, so much of the drive and rhythm of the music was lost, and voices could sound harsh and sibilant. But the Home had a muffled midrange and treble, making voices harder to understand. Lauren summed up the group’s unhappiness when she concluded, “I … guess I’d prefer the sibilant one?” Considering that only Geoff picked the Home as his favorite, the Echo has the advantage, especially if you listen to a lot of talk radio programs. But anyone who wants voice command with good sound should get an Echo Dot and connect it to a better system.
Brent also ran some lab tests on the speakers to confirm what everyone heard. Because the Home had neither input jacks nor Bluetooth capability at the time of testing—which would have allowed it to accept test signals from an audio analyzer—Brent had to perform the tests using a pink-noise track sourced from Spotify. He measured each speaker from the same eight locations in his listening room and then averaged each set of eight measurements to minimize the effects that the acoustics of his listening room had on the speakers’ performance. He found, to his surprise, that the Home actually had stronger measured treble response, but that the Echo had much better response in the midrange, between 300 and 1400 Hz, which covers most of the range of the human voice.
The measured frequency response curves of the Echo (blue trace) and the Home (green trace). Generally speaking, the flatter a line is, the better the speaker will sound. The Echo has much stronger response between 300 and 1400 Hz, which is where most of the sounds of human voices reside.
A few other performance characteristics are worth noting. For starters, in our tests the Echo played +4.5 dB louder than the Home. In a bedroom or kitchen, such a difference probably doesn’t matter, but in a very large living room the Home might not sound loud enough. The Echo is a true omnidirectional speaker, too, so it will more easily fill a large space with sound. In contrast, the Home has a single, front-firing speaker driver with passive radiators on the side to reinforce the bass, and the sound seems even more muffled when you move to the sides and back of the speaker.
In addition to testing the sound quality of the Home and the Echo, Brent subjected both speakers to microphone tests. He used computer-generated male and female voice commands so that they would be perfectly consistent for every test, something a live human voice can’t achieve.
He found that the Echo edged out the Home in hearing voice commands through the music it was playing, and that it could hear at levels -2.75 dB lower than the Home with the music playback levels set the same. If you play your music loud, the Echo’s voice recognition might work a little better for you. However, Brent also found that the Home did a better job of recognizing voices while pink noise played from a nearby Bluetooth speaker (set at 70 dB). Coincidentally, the Home could hear commands at levels -2.75 dB lower than the Echo through the same noise level. If you plan to use your speaker in a noisy workshop, the Home’s voice recognition might work a little better.
Brent tests the ability of the Home and the Echo to respond to voice commands played back through a Genelec professional recording monitor while the speakers are playing music.
Photo: Lauren Dragan
Overall, we think both these speakers are okay for casual, low-level listening, but many of the other
that The Wirecutter has tested deliver clearly superior sound quality.
The ability to turn things on and off with your voice is a big selling point of the Echo, and the Home is also poised to appeal to smart-home fans.
Considering that this smart speaker comes from a company that both makes smart-home devices (Nest’s thermostat, camera, and smoke alarms) and helped design a smart-home protocol (Thread), you might expect it to include integration skills from the start. At launch, Home worked with , the
(but not the Nest Cam or the Nest Protect), , and the integration cloud service IFTTT. Other device integrations came later, including Wink and Harmony smart-home hubs, August locks, LIFX bulbs, and TP-Link bulbs and switches. Echo devices still work with considerably more smart-home accessories, but Google is catching up.
We had no problems linking a Nest thermostat and several Philips Hue bulbs to the Home. In the Home app you can designate rooms and note which bulbs go in each so you can control the lights either individually or by group. The Home responds quickly to lighting commands and can turn the bulbs on, turn them off, dim them, and change their color, though in a few days of our testing this feature, it failed to turn on all the lights in a group about 30 percent of the time. The Echo can also change the color of Hue bulbs, but it does so through a clunky method of switching scenes, which you have to set up ahead of time in the Hue app. The Echo isn’t always perfect, but over many months of use, it has been more reliable.
Pull QuoteThe Echo isn’t always perfect, but over many months of use, it has been more reliable.
Nest integration worked perfectly for the Home in our tests. You simply link your Nest account with the Home though the Home app, name the thermostat, and then tell the Home what you want it to do. The Home’s Nest commands are a little easier to use than the Echo’s. With the Echo, you need to state the name of the Nest exactly (“Turn living room Nest to 68 degrees”), whereas with the Home you can use simpler phrases such as “Turn the temperature to 68” or “Make it warmer.” It’s a small difference, but a useful one if some members of your household aren’t as knowledgeable about smart-home control as others.
The cloud integration service IFTTT allows you to expand the Home’s smart abilities beyond the limited natively supported hardware. Currently you get a short list of IFTTT applets, but some of them include controls for Harmony’s Hub home theater remote, plus social media services Twitter and Facebook. As with the Echo’s IFTTT integration, using the feature with the Home can require awkward voice commands, and because it necessitates a meeting in the cloud of multiple accounts, it isn’t always fast.
Currently you can find only a handful of IFTTT applets for the Google Home, but we expect this section to grow as the number of Home users grows.
The Home’s SmartThings integration allows you to control in-wall and plug-in smart switches wirelessly connected to your SmartThings hub. As with the Hue bulbs, you can group these devices for easier control.
As of November 2017, the Home can understand two commands at once, something the Echo still can’t do. As reported in , you can ask Assistant to dim your lights and start streaming something on your TV, without having to stop and say, “Hey, Google,” in between. However, it can understand only up to two commands at a time.
Pull QuoteOnly one person’s calendar can be accessed, and only one person can use the shopping list.
People familiar with Amazon’s Alexa group of products will probably wonder if Google has an equivalent to the Dot (the $50 mini Echo version that connects to your Bluetooth speaker or other sound system to make up for its poor built-in speaker) or the Tap (the battery-operated version of the Echo for outside use). Right now the answer is no. On the other hand, Google’s Chromecast devices, which we discussed earlier, offer a good way to get your Home’s content onto other speakers, or even screens, around your house.
As with the Echo and Alexa, the Google Home is always listening for its wake phrase, and it sends your requests to its cloud server for processing. Being a Google device, it uses the information it gets from those requests to tailor other services (and probably ads) to you, though we haven’t experienced any correlation in Google ads since using the Home. If you use the Google Home to ask about pet shops, don’t be surprised if dog-food ads show up in your Gmail inbox. You can look at what Google collects in the
Web page, and Google lets you delete items you don’t want associated with your account, but the company suggests that deleting everything will prevent Google Assistant from improving as your personal assistant. Google includes its privacy policy in the app, or you can read through it .
Beyond the always-listening aspect, which understandably may trouble some people, the Home is an Internet of Things device, so we asked Google about the protections it has in place to keep customers’ data safe and to prevent it from being exploited in DDoS attacks. Google representatives replied that while no third-party software is allowed to run on the Home, all software is validated through a cryptographically verified secure-boot process before it runs on the device. If any software is tampered with, the cryptographic signature verification will prevent the software from loading and stop the Home from operating. Google also cryptographically protects all communications between the Home and Google cloud services. Also, as with the Echo, all Home updates are automatically pushed from Google to the device.
We expect the Home (and subsequent versions) to keep catching up to the Echo and Alexa in terms of smart-home device compatibility, and we will continue to update this guide as that happens.
In October 2017, Google announced the
and . The Home Mini is a small, cloth-covered device that will be available in October for about $50 (currently available for preorder). It comes with a new broadcast feature that lets you talk through other Home devices throughout the house. The Home Max is more of a speaker system that also comes with the same voice-recognition features of the rest of the Home line. Google claims that—with dual high-excursion woofers and two custom tweeters—the Home Max offers the loudest, best sound of any Home product. It has Google’s Assistant built in, voice control, an auxiliary port, and connects with YouTube, Spotify, Pandora, and several other music programs. It will be available for about $400 in December, though there was a waiting list at the time of this writing (the same day it became available to preorder).
Also in October 2017, Sonos announced that its existing speakers would be compatible with Alexa after a firmware upgrade. The company also released the , a smart speaker with built-in Alexa capabilities—no need for a separate Alexa device. Of course, this is not helpful in the short term if you’re committed to using the Google Assistant, but Sonos says it plans to add support for the Google Assistant on the Sonos One sometime in 2018. And because Sonos is intentionally calling Alexa “the first voice assistant” for Sonos (and not “the only voice assistant for Sonos”) it’s not unlikely we’ll see support for the Google Assistant coming to other Sonos speakers soon. We’ll keep our eyes open.
that Google Assistant will be available on all of its smart-home devices, allowing users to check how much time is left on a load of laundry or control their robot vacuum from their Google Home or smartphone.
Panasonic and Sony are both releasing their own smart speakers with Google Assistant.
features a minimalist design with the capability to listen to music, ask Google questions, and control other smart-home devices like Chromecast TVs and thermostats.
is a splash-proof, 360-degree speaker with touch-free controls, an optional LED clock display, as well as Chromecast capabilities.}