I have stretch marks and i just want to cover them up. whats the best thing to use to cover stretch marks ?
September 11, 2013
I have stretch marks and i just want to cover them up. whats the best thing to use to cover stretch marks ?
Not online.I have stretch marks too and i use Palmers. They have creams and oils that you can apply and they have visibly reduced my stretch marks. I have used these four products and they all reduce the size and visibility of the stretch marks. Cocoa Butter Formula(R) Body Milk for Stretch Marks. Organics Massage Cream for Stretch Marks. Organics Massage Lotion for Stretch Marks. and the last one is Organics Tummy Butter for Stretch Marks. The last one is the one that helped me the most and i reccomend that one to you before the others but they all work.coco butter or bio oil to fade them
Tag: I have stretch marks and i just want to cover them up. whats the best thing to use to cover stretch marks ?I am an applications developer for a for-profit college in Virginia.
At this point I could code all of what I do in notepad if I wanted to, or had to, but I prefer to use an IDE for speed and organization.
As a Mac user, I've used such IDEs as NotePad++, Coda, TextMate, TextEdit, NetBeans, and of course Dreamweaver.
At work my company owns licenses for the Adobe Suite that includes Dreamweaver and I enjoy the code hinting, the grouping of related files, the built-in FTP, the code snippets and custom keyboard actions.
I get flack from other developers when I mention that I use Dreamweaver.
Is there a reason why I should NOT be using it...or is it just a case similar to people who think only black and white tattoos are cool and anything else isn't?
8,67912549
2,15722138
closed as primarily opinion-based by ♦
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question
will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the , please .
The people who object to you using Dreamweaver probably mean the
part which is known to produce .
By the way, NotePad++, Coda, TextMate and TextEdit are just editors, not IDEs, because they don't integrate build automation or debugging tools out of the box.
The issue most people have with Dreamweaver is that it's a code generator, and code generators are renowned for producing poor-quality HTML. (the main issue with that - other than pride in one one's word - being that it causes cross-browser compatibility issues)
if you take away the code generation aspect, it's a straight fight between any other IDE, and other IDEs are just as good or better.
That said, I haven't used Dreamweaver in a long time so I can't really comment on its current version. Maybe the code generation has improved massively (but I doubt it). Maybe it really is a better IDE than all the rest. In the end, the choice of IDE if you're comfortable in Dreamweaver, then it's a good choice for you.
101k26138215
Any person who gives you flack for your choice of editor is not a true developer. Certain IDEs have certain benefits based on the languages/frameworks they are targeting to speed or ease development pains. If your company bought Adobe, and you like Dreamweaver and code comfortably in it... then keep doing it. Dreamweaver is an outstanding product, and if it does what you need it to do then use it.
None of these developers who give you flack are responsible for your paycheck, so screw them. Use the tool that gets it done. If someone shows you a better one, have no shame in switching. If they don't, keep on keepin' on.
26.8k54680
If you like it then use it. It's only up to you which editor to use and to decide is it worth that money.
7,87012636
Obviously we could all do 99% of our coding in notepad, but we choose IDEs for their productivity boosting, code-writing abbilities.
It depends what you are developing in. If you're coding C# and .NET using Dreamweaver would be an odd choice, though you could make it work.
If you're developing client side web stuff in XHTML, JavaScript, and CSS Dreamweaver is a fine choice.
16.2k1372135
I do like Dreamweaver when I'm building front ends and I want to see what I'm building. When it comes to coding I'd pick another tool. I think NetBeans is great for PHP and I love it how it raises code problems, and HTML issues (especially in regards to accessibility, standards, doctypes). Notepad++ is a godsend! I couldn't develop without it.
One think I always hated with Dreamweaver was the auto JavaScript features (and later SPRY framework) as these appealed to non coders as they provide functionality. What they don't realise is that Dreamweaver will produced bloated, horrible scripts. I once produced a JS/CSS dynamic menu using 2 CSS classes and 11 lines of unobtrusive JS. When getting Dreamweaver to produce something similar using a wizard it produced JS code in my page and a 1200 line JS file.
When I'm writing C# I have to use Visual Studio...
Just something I wanted to get off my chest.
3,42743569
I personally use Eclipse [currently 3.6 Helios], but have worked once on DW and I must say that it is extremely handy when it comes to write HTML or CSS. It is not that useful when it comes to write PHP or other programming languages, but for frontend it is VERY nice.
8,26552853
Funny, I remember a time in pre-Adobe acquisition days when Dreamweaver was considered the serious developer's tool and tools like Front Page were for novices.
I agree with others that it may be the code generation aspects that the detractors have in mind.
I used them once when I was learning PHP.
After seeing the generated code, once was enough.
Like you I now use it for it's other features.
If it forces nothing on you (if it lets you edit HTML without adding all kinds of nonsense you're not interested in), and you like using it, I see no reason not to. Especially since you mentioned some interesting features it has that you like to use.
Those "other developers" are probably thinking in black and white, unless Dreamweaver cannot be used as simply a code editor, but I believe it can.
I wouldn't care much about what those other developers think, unless they have compelling arguments. I think you would've mentioned those, if they had any. They're probably also the kind of developer that thinks anything Microsoft or Apple or whatever makes is automatically crap.
I've used it, a few, and quite time ago.
IMHO, the worst feature of Dreamweaver was that the basic layout of almost all HTML web pages was controlled using tables.
If you wanted to write an accesible HTML page (wich was requirement for a bunch of customers) you had to fight against it, and code the divs against its natural tendence to build tables.
Experienced web developers often use plain text editors (with syntax-highlighting) because the richer tools can get in the way as much as they help. However, any tool that lets you control every last character of the code will generally keep any developer happy, and I believe Dreamweaver does allow this via its bidirectional WYSIWYG-code editing mechanism.
104k17212267
Anyone who knows enough about coding to complain about "tag soup" or the spaghetti Javascript Dreamweaver produces should also know how to close the "snippets" toolbox and just use the program for what it's good at.
I personally find Dreamweaver's
to be an excellent tool for debugging jQuery.
1,68411739
Not the answer you're looking for?
Browse other questions tagged
Top questions and answers
Important announcements
Unanswered questions
By subscribing, you agree to the
Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabledI just want to use I this lifetime to love you。
我只想用我这一辈子去爱你。
喜欢就猛击分享!
个性网内容精选：}