interacting 和interacted 届和级的区别别

個人化服務
查詢符號(半形)
查詢符號意義說明
表示為「AND」兩個查詢詞之交集
片語以雙引號標示開始及結束,而且只尋找出現順序相同的字詞,例
image process
表示一個字母切截,輸入兩個?表兩個字母,依此類推,例:輸入「Appl?」,查得結果應為appl
常用於英文字查詢
表示不限字母切截,由0~n. 例:輸入「appl*」,查得結果應為appl
常用於英文字查詢
AND、OR、NOT
布林邏輯組合關鍵字,用來擴大或縮小查詢範圍的技巧。
:縮小查詢範圍
:擴大查詢範圍 (3) NOT:排除不相關的範圍
是數位物件識別碼
為物件在網路上的唯一識別碼,可用於永久連結並引用目標物件。
使用DOI作為永久連結
每個DOI號前面加上
便成為永久網址。
如以DOI號為
10.5297/ser.
的文獻為例,此文獻的永久連結便是:
日後不論出版單位如何更動此文獻位置,永久連結所指向的位置皆會即時更新,不再錯失重要的研究。
引用含有DOI的文獻
有DOI的文獻在引用時皆應同時引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未規範DOI的引用格式,可引用DOI永久連結。
DOI可強化引用精確性、增強學術圈連結,並給予使用者跨平台的良好使用經驗,目前在全世界已有超過五千萬個物件申請DOI。
如想對DOI的使用與概念有進一步了解,請參考
同意授權/列印瀏覽電子全文服務,於
, 碩士  指導教授:謝旭亮  
光是一個重要的環境因子,影響植物整個生長與發育。而茉莉酸與離層酸為重要的植物荷爾蒙,在植物生命週期中及對抗環境逆境都扮演著重要的角色。植物要如何將外部的光源與內源的離層酸與茉莉酸訊息調控機制做整合,至今為止尚未明瞭。在阿拉伯芥中,已知FIN219為遠紅光訊息傳遞下的正調控者,並可促進JA-Ile的生合成,進而影響茉莉酸訊息調控。實驗室前人利用酵母菌雙雜交法(yeast two-hybrid)找出與FIN219具有交互作用的蛋白質,命名為FIN219-interacting protein 2(FIP2),即為glutamyl-tRNA synthetase(GluRS)。在前人的研究當中已知FIP2/GluRS會與ABA INSENSITIVE 1 (ABI1)以及Homeodomain protein 6(AtHB6)有交互作用。在本篇研究裡,我們利用探討FIN219與FIP2在遠紅光下如何共同調節茉莉酸與離層酸的訊息,幫助了解植物如何整合協調外部光源與內生荷爾蒙的訊息傳遞。我們首先證實FIN219與FIP2在菸草與阿拉伯芥中都有交互作用,而FIN219是利用C端與FIP2進行結合。而在遠紅光中處理MeJA的情況下,FIP2與FIN219之間有相互抑制的現象。另外,FIP2基因表現量下降的轉殖株在遠紅光下同時處理茉莉酸與離層酸,與野生型相比,會呈現較長的下胚軸之外表型。利用電子顯微鏡還觀察到FIP2缺失或大量表現的植株,其原生質體及葉綠體的發育均受到影響。當FIP2大量表現時,會使植株不同部位的組織對荷爾蒙反應出現差異:其氣孔對茉莉酸與離層酸的處理較不敏感,但根部對離層酸卻是非常敏感。而大量表現FIN219則使植株對茉莉酸和離層酸的處理變得較為敏感,氣孔大小較野生型來的小;綜合上述結果顯示FIP2不但可與FIN219互相調節參與遠紅光的訊息路徑,還協調茉莉酸和離層酸的訊息傳遞,整合了光、茉莉酸和離層酸信號傳導。
Light is one of the most important environmental factors regulating multiple aspects of plant growth and development. Abscisic acid (ABA) and jasmonate (JA) are plant hormones that play important roles during many phases of the plant life cycle and in plant responses to various environmental stresses. How plants integrate the external light signal and endogenous ABA and JA pathways for better adaptation to environmental stresses remains unknown. Far-red insensitive 219 (FIN219/JAR1) has been shown to be a positive signal component in FR signaling pathway. To further understand the function of FIN219 in light signaling during Arabidopsis development, a yeast two-hybrid approach has been used to isolate FIN219-interacting partners. A gene FIP2 (FIN219-interacting protein 2) encoding a glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) was isolated. However, its function is not completely understood although previous studies showed that GluRS interacted with ABA INSENSITIVE 1 (ABI1) and Homeodomain protein 6 (AtHB6). By Co-IP Assays, we demonstrate a physical interaction between the full-length FIN219 and FIP2 in Nicotiana benthamiana, and this interaction occurred via the C terminus of FIN219 and the FIP2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Besides, under FR and MeJA treatments, FIN219 and FIP2 can negatively regulate each other. Furthermore, the fip2 mutant shows insensitivity in hypocotyl growth to MeJA and ABA under FR light. Moreover, FIP2 overexpression results in the insensitivity of stomatal opening to MeJA and ABA. Interestingly, both FIP2 knocked-down mutant and overexpressor lines showed a defect in the number and the development of chloroplasts. Taken together, these data indicate that FIP2 may function via different mechanisms from shoot to root in ABA signaling and participate in the integration of FR light, JA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis.
Abe, H., Urao, T., Ito, T., Seki, M., Shinozaki, K., and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2003). Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15: 63-78.
Ahmad, M., and Cashmore, A.R. (1996). The pef mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana define lesions early in the phytochrome signaling pathway. Plant J. 10: .
Ballesteros, M.L., Bolle, C., Lois, L.M., Moore, J.M., Vielle-Calzada, J.P., Grossniklaus, U., and Chua, N.H. (2001). LAF1, a MYB transcription activator for phytochrome A signaling. Gene Dev. 15: .
Block, A., Schmelz, E., Jones, J.B., and Klee, H.J. (2005). Coronatine and salicylic acid: the battle between Arabidopsis and Pseudomonas for phytohormone control. Mol. Plant Pathol. 6: 79-83.
Buche, C., Poppe, C., Schafer, E., and Kretsch, T. (2000). eid1: A new arabidopsis mutant hypersensitive in phytochrome A-dependent high-irradiance responses. Plant Cell 12: 547-558.
文章公開取用時,將寄通知信至您填寫的信箱地址
購物車中已有多篇文章,請問是否要先清除,或一併加入購物車中購買 ?
客戶服務專線
服務時間:週一~五
9:00~18:00
地址:234台灣新北市永和區成功路一段80號18樓
(C) 2011airiti Inc. All rights reserved.
華藝數位股份有限公司Word family
(adjective)
From Longman Dictionary of Contemporary Englishin?ter?act /??nt?r'aekt/
●●○ AWL verb [intransitive]
1 RELATIONSHIPif people
with each other, they talk to each other, work
etcinteract with
Lucy interacts well with other children in the class.2 TOGETHERif one thing interacts with another, or if they interact, they
each otherinteract with
The immune system interacts with both the nervous system and the hormones.Examples from the Corpusinteracto Playing a
is a way for a family to interact.o We
about how people and their
interact.interact witho How will the
interact with other ?o
in a U-shape, so the
can interact easily with the .
Pictures of the day
What are these?
Click on the pictures to check.
Explore topics
Word of the day
Verb tableinteractPresentI, you, we, theyinteracthe, she, itinteracts
& View More
PastI, you, he, she, it, we, theyinteractedPresent perfectI, you, we, theyhave interactedhe, she, ithas interactedPast perfectI, you, he, she, it, we, theyhad interactedFutureI, you, he, she, it, we, theywill interactFuture perfectI, you, he, she, it, we, theywill have interacted
& View Less
PresentIam interactinghe, she, itis interacting
& View More
you, we, theyare interactingPastI, he, she, itwas interactingyou, we, theywere interactingPresent perfectI, you, we, theyhave been interactinghe, she, ithas been interactingPast perfectI, you, he, she, it, we, theyhad been interactingFutureI, you, he, she, it, we, theywill be interactingFuture perfectI, you, he, she, it, we, theywill have been interacting
& View LessInteract - definition of interact by The Free Dictionary https://www.thefreedictionary.com/interact
interact Also found in: , , , , , .Related to interact:
in·ter·act
(ĭn′tər-ăkt′)intr.v. in·ter·act·ed, in·ter·act·ing, in·ter·acts
To act on each other: "More than a dozen variable factors could interact, with their permutations running into the thousands" (Tom Clancy).interact (??nt?r'aekt) vb (intr) to act on or in close relation with each otherin•ter•act
(ˌɪn tərˈaekt)
to act upon one another.
in`ter•ac′tant, n.
interactPast participle: interactedGerund: interactingImperativePresentPreteritePresent ContinuousPresent PerfectPast ContinuousPast PerfectFutureFuture PerfectFuture ContinuousPresent Perfect ContinuousFuture Perfect ContinuousPast Perfect ContinuousConditionalPast ConditionalImperativeinteractinteractPresentI interactyou interacthe/she/it interactswe interactyou interactthey interactPreteriteI interactedyou interactedhe/she/it interactedwe interactedyou interactedthey interactedPresent ContinuousI am interactingyou are interactinghe/she/it is interactingwe are interactingyou are interactingthey are interactingPresent PerfectI have interactedyou have interactedhe/she/it has interactedwe have interactedyou have interactedthey have interactedPast ContinuousI was interactingyou were interactinghe/she/it was interactingwe were interactingyou were interactingthey were interactingPast PerfectI had interactedyou had interactedhe/she/it had interactedwe had interactedyou had interactedthey had interactedFutureI will interactyou will interacthe/she/it will interactwe will interactyou will interactthey will interactFuture PerfectI will have interactedyou will have interactedhe/she/it will have interactedwe will have interactedyou will have interactedthey will have interactedFuture ContinuousI will be interactingyou will be interactinghe/she/it will be interactingwe will be interactingyou will be interactingthey will be interactingPresent Perfect ContinuousI have been interactingyou have been interactinghe/she/it has been interactingwe have been interactingyou have been interactingthey have been interactingFuture Perfect ContinuousI will have been interactingyou will have been interactinghe/she/it will have been interactingwe will have been interactingyou will have been interactingthey will have been interactingPast Perfect ContinuousI had been interactingyou had been interactinghe/she/it had been interactingwe had been interactingyou had been interactingthey had been interactingConditionalI would interactyou would interacthe/she/it would interactwe would interactyou would interactthey would interactPast ConditionalI would have interactedyou would have interactedhe/she/it would have interactedwe would have interactedyou would have interactedthey would have interacted
Switch to Verb1.interact - act together or towards o "He should interact more with his colleagues",
- act in unison or agreement and in secret towards a deceitfu "The two companies conspired to cause the value of the stock to fall",
- transmit
"He communicated his anxieties to the psychiatrist" - at "I try to reach out to my daughter but she doesn't want to have anything to do with me", ,
- treat condescendingly -
interchange
"He and his sons haven't communicated for years"; "Do you communicate well with your advisor?", ,
- control (others or oneself) or influence skillfully, usually to one' "She manipulates her boss"; "She is a very controlling mother and doesn't let her children grow up"; "The teacher knew how to keep the class in line"; "she keeps in line" - "transact with foreign governments",
- perform an action, or work out or perform (an action); "think before you act"; "We must move quickly"; "The governor should act on the new energy bill"; "The nanny acted quickly by grabbing the toddler and covering him with a wet towel",
- relegate to a lower or outer edge, as of speci "We must not marginalize the poor in our society" - join for a common purpose o "These forces combined with others" - have a personal or business relat "have a postdoc"; "have an assistant"; "have a lover",
- "I invited them to a restaurant",
- take part
"He never socializes with his colleagues"; "The old man hates to socialize", ,
- establish commun "did you finally connect with your long-lost cousin?", , , ,
"We assembled in the church basement"; "Let's gather in the dining room" - have or establi "She relates well to her peers", ,
- inter "Do right by her"; "Treat him with caution, please"; "Handle the press reporters gently" - display excessive love or show excessi "This student falls all over her former professor when she sees him", , ,
- get involved, so as to alter or hinder an action, or through forc "Why did the U.S. not intervene earlier in WW II?", , ,
- "He associates with strange people"; "She affiliates with her colleagues", ,
"He has been womanizing for years"
?????????vzájemně p?sobithave kontakt medentr’acteegymásra hatverka gagnkvaemtdialoginiss?veikas?veikaujantisveikti vienas kit?savstarpēji iedarbotiesentr’acteinteragerenvzájomne p?sobi?etkile?mekinteract [&#x2ɪntərˈækt] VI → , to interact with sb →
algninteract [&#x2ɪntərˈækt] vi [people] → to interact with sb →
avec qn [substances, chemicals] → to interact with sth →
avec qchinteract vi →
; (Phys) → wechselwirken; (Psych, Sociol) → interagiereninteract [&#x2ɪntərˈækt] vi → interact (int?r'?kt)
verb (of two or more people, things etc) to act, or have some effect, on each other.
wisselwerking uitoefen
взаимодействам
vzájemně p?sobit
p? have kontakt med ;
vastastikku m?jutama
????? ?????? ?????
olla vuorovaikutuksessa
??????? ????????
?? ????? ?? ???????? ????
me?usobno djelovati
egymásra hat
berinteraksi
verka gagnkvaemt
相互に作用する
veikti vienas kit?
savstarpēji iedarboties
berinteraksi
op elkaar inwerken
oddzia?ywa? na siebie wzajemnie
?????? ???? ??????? ??????? ?????
influenciar-se
a interac?iona, a ac?iona unul asupra altuia
vzájomne p?sobi?
medsebojno delovati
komunicirati
interagera, p?verka varandra
?????????????????
etkile?mek
вза?мод?яти
????? ????
t??ng tác ?inter'action (-??n)
noun wisselwerking
взаимодействие
die Wechselwirkung
gensidig p? interaktion , δι?δραση
??? ? ??????
vuorovaikutus
????????? ????????
????????? ???????
interakcija, uzajamno djelovanje
k?lcs?nhatás
ví gagnkvaem áhrif
mijiedarbī savstarpēja iedarbība
wzajemne oddzia?ywanie
?????? ???? ??????? ??????? ?????
interac??o
interac?iune
interakcia
medsebojno vplivanje
komunikacija
?msesidig p?verkan, v?xelverkan
вза?мод?я
????? ?????
s? t??ng tác ?inter'active (-iv)
adjective allowing a continuous exchange of information between a computer and the person using it, so that the computer can respond immediately to the user's instructions or questions. an interactive system/ interactive video games. wisselwerkend
????????? ?????????
взаимодействащ
interativo
interaktivní
interaktiv
αλληλεπιδραστικ??, διαδραστικ??
interaktiivne
vuorovaikutteinen
interactif/-ive
?????????? ????????
interaktivan, koji uzajamno djeluju
párbeszédes, interaktív
interaktif
(コンピューターと)対話方式の
s?veikaujantis, dialoginis
interaktīvs
interaktif , in wisselwerking
interakcyjny
?????? ???
interaktívny
interaktiven
interaktivan
interaktiv
?????????????????????????????????????? ?????????
etkile?imli
вза?мод?йний; ?нтерактивний
có s? t??ng tác
交互式的,人机对话的 interact vi interactuar
Want to thank TFD for its existence? , add a link to this page, or visit .
Link to this page:
Since the mental world and the physical world interact, there would be a boundary between the two: there would be events which would have physical causes and mental effects, while there would be others which would have mental causes and physical effects. Interact has launched an exclusive platform tailored specifically to nonprofit organizations.For nearly 10 years a scheme called InterACT gave paid, on-the-job training to aspiring theatre professionals.And Interact Theatre Compapany, sink your teeth into ``Urinetown.MANAGING PHYSICIAN PERFORMANCE -- June 24-Aug 4, InterAct (24 core hrs $ non)Through simulation, technology may provide students with authentic cultural experience through a manipulative virtual space, in which students can actively interact with virtual learning environment while engaging in different learning tasks.Al ofrecer nuestras soluciones de vanguardia en los dos idiomas propios de la mayoria de los paises de America Latina, podemos ayudar a una gama mas amplia de empresas pequenas, medianas y grandes", observa Flavio Manfredi Lebrao, gerente general de Interact Latin America, la division regional que Interact Commerce Corporation opera desde Miami.It has been shown that introducing functional groups into existing polymers that can interact specifically with particulate fillers is a proper technique for reducing rolling resistance and for improving wet skid resistance or wear resistance in tread compounds.InterAct Public Safety Systems, a leading provider of safety and security software used by government agencies as well as private sector businesses, announced that its third quarter has achieved a record amount of new business.InterAct courses are computer based courses you complete at home.These particles would give off no light and would interact with each other only slightly, through the weak nuclear force--the same force that governs, for example, the radioactive decay of atoms.When ACPE first began InterAct distance education courses over four years ago, the vast majority of our members were still connecting to the Internet by telephone modems, and CD-Roms were just becoming standard equipment on new computers for the home.
▲interact▼
For webmasters:Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
Identification of HYPK-Interacting Proteins Reveals Involvement of HYPK in Regulating Cell Growth, Cell Cycle, Unfolded Protein Response and Cell Death
Identification of HYPK-Interacting Proteins Reveals Involvement of HYPK in Regulating Cell Growth, Cell Cycle, Unfolded Protein Response and Cell Death
Kamalika Roy Choudhury,&
Swasti Raychaudhuri,&
Nitai P. Bhattacharyya
AbstractHuntingtin Yeast Two-Hybrid Protein K (HYPK) is an intrinsically unstructured huntingtin (HTT)-interacting protein with chaperone-like activity. To obtain more information about the function(s) of the protein, we identified 27 novel interacting partners of HYPK by pull-down assay coupled with mass spectrometry and, further, 9 proteins were identified by co-localization and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays. In neuronal cells, (EEF1A1 and HSPA1A), (HTT and LMNB2) and (TP53 and RELA) were identified in complex with HYPK in different experiments. Various Gene Ontology (GO) terms for biological processes, like protein folding (GO: 0006457), response to unfolded protein (GO: 0006986), cell cycle arrest (GO: 0007050), anti-apoptosis (GO: 0006916) and regulation of transcription (GO: 0006355) were significantly enriched with the HYPK-interacting proteins. Cell growth and the ability to refold heat-denatured reporter luciferase were decreased, but cytotoxicity was increased in neuronal cells where HYPK was knocked-down using HYPK antisense DNA construct. The proportion of cells in different phases of cell cycle was also altered in cells with reduced levels of HYPK. These results show that HYPK is involved in several biological processes, possibly through interaction with its partners.
IntroductionHuntingtin Yeast Two-Hybrid Protein K (HYPK, gene ID: 25764) was first identified as a Huntingtin (HTT)-interacting protein using a yeast two-hybrid assay . We previously confirmed this interaction by immunoprecipitation (IP) and co-localization in cultured cells . It has been further shown that HYPK belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUP) with a pre-molten globule like conformation . HYPK exhibits chaperone-like activity in vitro and in vivo without being homologous to any known chaperone and can reduce formation of aggregates and apoptosis in a cell model of Huntington’s disease (HD) . The catalytic and auxiliary subunits of human Nα-terminal-acetyltransferase (NatA) complex (NAA10 and NAA15 respectively) that participate in co-translational N-terminal acetylation of proteins, have been found to be associated with HYPK in polysome fraction . Reduced expression of human NAA10 and NAA15 resulted in a decrease in the amount of HYPK protein indicating that these components maintain stability of HYPK. In addition, it has also been shown that HYPK is necessary for efficient N-terminal acetylation of known NatA substrate. However, there were no significant effects of HYPK knock-down on the expression of NAA10 and NAA15. Knock-down of NAA10, NAA15 or HYPK increases the aggregates formed by mutant HTT. When the expression of HYPK was reduced, HeLa cells were arrested in G0/G1 phase of cell cycle. This result suggests that HYPK is involved in post-translational modification of proteins and cell cycle regulation . HYPK was co-purified with ribosome-associated MPP11/DNAJC2/Hsp70L1 complex along with ARD1/NAA10 and NAA15 . HYPK thus may act as a binding partner to one or more of these proteins. In addition, 8 proteins (viz., CHD3, GC, MDFI, PSME3, QKI, RBPMS, RHOXF2 and TH1L) were identified to interact with HYPK in yeast two-hybrid assay , , although none of them were further validated as a binding partner of HYPK.
IUPs are commonly identified in the hubs of protein-protein interaction networks and are able to form complexes with other proteins , , . Swiss-Prot annotated cellular processes like cell differentiation, transcription, cell cycle, mitosis, meiosis, apoptosis, ubiquitin proteasomal degradation, growth regulation, ribosome biogenesis and mRNA processing are enriched with IUPs , . Recently, we have shown that IUPs are significantly over-represented among the proteins involved in HD, Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). IUPs were reported to be prevalent among the hub proteins (having more than 10 interacting partners) involved in HD pathology as compared to the end proteins. Various biological processes such as neuronal activities, cell proliferation and differentiation, cell structure and motility, apoptosis and its regulation, carbohydrate and protein metabolism, cell cycle, intracellular protein traffic, electron transport and protein targeting and localization are reported to be enriched with IUPs involved in neurodegenerative diseases .
Based on the above observations, we hypothesized that HYPK might interact with various other proteins. In this study, we identified 36 novel HYPK-interacting proteins. Our experimental results and bioinformatics analyses confirmed participation of HYPK and its interacting partners in cell growth, cell cycle regulation, maintenance of cell survival and unfolded protein response.
Materials and MethodsThe list of antibodies used and their sources are shown in .
Cell Culture, Preparation of DNA Constructs and Transfection
STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 and STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 cell lines, obtained as generous gift from Dr. Marcy E. MacDonald, were cultured as published earlier , . Neuro2A and HeLa cell lines were procured from National Cell Science Centre (Pune, India) and the growth conditions were similar to those published earlier . Mouse striatal cell lines expressing full-length HTT protein with either 7 glutamine (Q) residues (designated as STHdhQ7/HdhQ7) or 111 Q residues (designated as STHdhQ111/HdhQ111) represent the normal and diseased condition (i.e., HD) respectively. Gene cloning and transfection were performed as described earlier . Detailed information of human genes cloned in fluorescent expression vectors using PCR primers is shown in . A list of all the cloned genes used in this study and their sources is shown in . The cloned genes are designated by gene symbols followed by the tags (e.g. HYPK-GFP). Co-localization of proteins was determined using confocal microscopy following methods described earlier . Extent of co-localization between the pixels of the two channels was determined by the square of the Pearson correlation coefficient value (Rp) generated by in-built software. This squared value, R2, is defined as the percentage of variance of the pixels in first channel which is dependent on the variance of that of the second channel.
Preparation of Soluble Cell Lysate (SCL) from Cultured Mammalian Cell Lines
Cells in culture were washed and scraped with 1 ml of ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and collected by centrifugation at 4500 rpm for 3 min at 4°C. The pellets were re-suspended in 50 ul of ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0 containing 150 mM sodium chloride, 1.0% NP-40 and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail) followed by 30 min of constant agitation at 4°C. These crude extracts were again centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C and the supernatant was collected. The protein content in soluble cell lysate (SCL) was estimated by Bradford assay.
Pull-down with Purified 6HN-HYPK
Recombinant 6HN-HYPK was purified following the methods described earlier . Pull-down experiments were carried out using ProFound(TM) Pull-Down PolyHis Protein: Protein Interaction Kit (Thermo Scientific Product no. 21277) as per manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 200 ug purified 6HN-HYPK (bait) was allowed to bind to Ni-NTA column for 4–5 h at 4°C in a rotating wheel. After thorough washing to remove any unbound bait protein, SCL from HeLa, Neuro2A, STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 or STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 cells (~800 ug) was used as prey and incubated with Ni-NTA column-bound HYPK overnight. In control experiments, only SCL was passed through Ni-NTA column without bound HYPK. The column was then washed thrice with binding buffer (the cell lysis buffer mentioned above) followed by elution of the bound complexes with 300 mM imidazole.
One-dimensional (1D) and Two-dimensional (2D) SDS-PAGE
Protein complexes obtained using the methods described above were resolved either on 1D SDS-polyacrylamide gradient (4%–16%) gels following standard protocol, or 2D SDS-polyacrylamide gels (12%) following methods described by Bhattacharya et al. . Resolved proteins were visualized after staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB). For 2D SDS-PAGE, linear immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips (7 cm, pH 3–10, Biorad, USA) were rehydrated with the pull-down complexes and electrophoresis was performed as described .
Mass Spectrometry (MS)
The visible bands (in case of 1D gel) or spots (in case of 2D gel) detected in the experimental and control (without the bait HYPK) gels were compared after staining and the unique bands or spots were cut, destained and prepared for mass spectrometry (MS) using the protocols described by Bhattacharya et al. . In brief, the bands/spots were analyzed using a MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (4700 Proteomic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems). The MS/MS data were pre-processed by the GPS Explorer(TM) software version 3.6 (Applied Biosystems) and proteins were identified using the MASCOT search engine, which incorporates a probability based implementation of the MOWSE (Molecular Weight SEarch) algorithm for protein annotation using a significance level of ≤0.05.
Immunocytochemistry for Detection of RelA (p65)
Neuro2A cells grown on coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at 37°C. The fixed cells were then permeabilized using 0.25% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS, blocked by 2% BSA (w/v) in PBS and were incubated with anti-mouse p65 and anti-rabbit HYPK antibodies overnight at 4°C. After thorough washing with PBS, cells were incubated with anti-mouse-TRiTC and anti-rabbit-FITC secondary antibodies for 2 h at 37°C and co-localization was analyzed using LSM 510 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) Studies
The methods used for co-IP were similar to which has been published . Anti-HYPK antibody was used to immunoprecipitate the HYPK-complex. The immunoprecipitated protein complex was eluted using 100 mM glycine, pH 3.0 (referred to as “immunoprecipitate elute” henceforth) and was analyzed by native and SDS-PAGE western blotting.
Native PAGE-western Transfer
In native PAGE, SDS was added neither in the gel-running buffer nor in sample-loading buffer (each 20 ml 2X native PAGE loading buffer contain 12.5 ml of 0.5 M Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, 2 ml of glycerol, 40 ul of 5% Bromophenol Blue and 5.5 ml of H2O). For efficient transfer of the large protein complexes to PVDF membrane, the gel was immersed in 1X SDS-PAGE running buffer and incubated at 75–80°C for 30 min in a hybridization oven (Amersham Life Sciences) followed by transfer and detection using antibodies as described above.
Antisense Mouse Hypk Cloning to Knock-down HYPK Expression in Mouse Neuronal Cells
To knock-down the expression of HYPK in mouse cells in culture, pRNA-U61/Hygro vector (Genscript, USA), commonly used for cloning siRNA, was utilized. The exon1 of Mus musculus HYPK gene (accession no. NM_) was used to obtain its reverse complementary sequence from . Primers were designed from the reverse
position bp 9 to 65 (minus strand). Primer sequence for cloning antisense HYPK is provided in . BamHI adaptor site in the forward primer and HindIII adaptor site in the reverse primer were used. In front of the HindIII adaptor sequence in the reverse primer, a poly (T) sequence was fused to ensure the termination of RNA expression from this DNA insert. This antisense-HYPK pU61 clone (designated throughout the manuscript as HYPK-U61) was transfected in Neuro2A and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7cell lines. These transfected cells were then selected with Hygromycin (Invitrogen, USA; final concentration 400 ug/ml) to make stable HYPK knocked-down cell lines. To nullify the effect of the vector, Neuro2A and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7cell lines were transfected with pU61 vectors and stable cell lines were established by selection with Hygromycin as described above.
Cell Growth
The growth curves for Neuro2A and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells and HYPK downregulated Neuro2A and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells were compared. To obtain the growth curves, ~105 cells were seeded in 60 mm petridishes in duplicate. Cell numbers were counted using a haemocytometer (Rohem, India) at 24 h intervals.
BrdU Cell Proliferation Assay
The proliferative capacity of STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells with endogenous and reduced HYPK expression was determined using BrdU cell proliferation assay kit (Calbiochem, Cat. No. QIA58) following manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, ~5×104 cells were seeded on 24-well culture plates in triplicate. Cells were transfected with either empty DsRed vector or HYPK-DsRed, and BrdU labels were added 24 h post-transfection. After 12 h of BrdU incorporation, cells were fixed and sequentially incubated with anti-BrdU primary and secondary antibodies. The quantity of BrdU incorporation was estimated by measuring the absorbance at dual wavelengths of 450–540 nm using an Epoch microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, USA).
Cell Survival (MTT Assay) in Presence and Absence of HYPK
MTT assay was performed using the methods described earlier . In brief, after addition of MTT, STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells were re-incubated in a CO2 incubator for 4 h at 33°C. Cells were then dissolved in 0.1N HCl-absolute isopropanol solvent. The colour generated was measured using SmartSpec Plus spectrophotometer (BioRad, USA) taking absorbance at 570 nm with background subtraction done at 630 nm.
Counting the Aggregates Formed by Mutant HTT
83Q-DsRed (100 ng and 200 ng) was transfected in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells and HYPK downregulated STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells. The number of cells with and without aggregates were then counted and percentage of cells containing aggregates was determined as described earlier .
Flow Cytometry
Empty vector (GFP) and HYPK-GFP transfected STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells and HYPK downregulated STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells growing in cultures were washed, trypsinized and harvested in PBS and fixed in 70% ethanol overnight at -20°C. After treatment with 1 mg/ml RNase A (Sigma, USA) at 37°C for 60 min, DNA staining was performed using 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) viability staining solution (BioLegend, USA) at 37°C for 15 min in dark, prior to flow cytometric analysis. Analysis was performed on a FACS calibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, USA). For each sample, 25,000 events were collected and aggregated cells were gated out. Percentage of cells existing within the different phases of the cell cycle was determined using CellQuest Pro software.
Response to Unfolded Reporter Luciferase Activity after Heat Shock
Luciferase assays were performed using the Tet-Off Advanced Inducible Gene Expression System (BD Biosciences, USA) as described earlier . HYPK downregulated Neuro2A or control (Neuro2A-U61) cells were transfected with pTet-Off-Advanced vector (BD Biosciences) and stable cell lines were obtained by selecting with G418 (Sigma) at a final concentration of 200 ug/ml. These pTet-Off+ve stable cells (designated as Tet+) were further transfected with the luciferase expression construct, pTRE-Tight-Luc (BD Biosciences). These stable cells are designated as Tet+Luc+ve henceforth. To identify the role of HYPK and its interacting partners in refolding of the heat-denatured reporter luciferase, we overexpressed either DsRed (vector control), HYPK-DsRed, EEF1A1-DsRed, CALM1-DsRed, LMNB2-DsRed or HSPA8-DsRed in the parental Tet+Luc+ve Neuro2A-U61 cells and Tet+Luc+ve Neuro2A-HYPK U61 cells. After 48 h of transfection cell extracts were prepared from these cells before heat shock (designated as No HS), immediately after heat shock at 43°C for 1 h (designated as HS) and after 6 h of recovery at 37°C following heat shock (designated as HS+R). Relative luciferase activities (in RLU) of these cell extracts at different time points were measured in a Sirius Luminometer (Berthold Detection Systems GmbH, Germany) with the Luciferase Assay System (Promega, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions as published earlier .
Bioinformatics Analyses
Several online facilities are available for analysis of various Gene Ontology (GO) terms enriched with a set of genes. In our experience, we find that GeneCodis2 is not only user friendly but it can also be used for enrichment of GO terms for molecular functions, biological processes, cellular components and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway. The proportion of proteins in a particular GO term from the input query list is computed and compared with those of proteins coded by human genome as catalogued in the database. The hypergeometric p value was computed after correction for multiple testing , . Analysis of HYPK-interacting proteins was performed using GeneCodis2 (). Biological pathway analysis of HYPK-interacting partners for enrichment was performed using GeneCodis2 and Reactome () databases .
Subcellular Localization and Expressions of HYPK-interacting Proteins
Information of subcellular localizations of the HYPK-interacting proteins was obtained from the online resource Nextprot () . Similarly information about expression of genes coding for HYPK-interacting proteins was obtained using Nextprot, BioMart () and Tissue-specific Gene Expression and Regulation (TiGER) () databases. In Nextprot, the reported expression of proteins in brain was derived from immunohistochemistry data. BioMart provides information of gene expressions from microarray data described in various external resources and different anatomical regions. In TiGER, the expression of genes in different organs is catalogued based on the numbers of expressed sequence tag (EST).
Statistical Analysis and Artwork Preparation
All experiments were repeated at least thrice unless otherwise mentioned and mean values, standard deviations and p values for Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test were calculated. For statistical calculations, Microsoft Excel and the online GraphPadQuickCalcs software were used. All the artworks were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS2.
Identification of Novel HYPK-interacting Proteins by Pull-down Followed by Mass Spectrometry (MS)
The scheme of a typical pull-down experiment is shown in , panel A. Pictures of typical 1D and 2D gels are shown in , panels B, C and D. All gels were stained with CBB. Representative mass spectrum obtained after trypsin digestion of a band/spot and database search for the protein HSP90AB1 is shown in , panel E. Representative mass spectra for 5 other proteins are shown in , , , , and . Proteins with significant (p≤0.05) probability-based MOWSE score are shown in . All together, we identified 27 novel HYPK-interacting proteins by pull-down coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) analysis using SCL from different cell lines as prey. In summary, we could identify 9 proteins using HeLa SCL, 12 proteins using Neuro2A SCL, 3 proteins using STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 SCL and 3 proteins using STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 SCL as prey. The detailed result is shown in .
Identification of HYPK-interacting partners using pull-down coupled with MALDI-mass spectrometry.Flow chart for pull-down experiment using purified 6HN-HYPK as bait (A); separation of pulled-down proteins by 1D SDS-PAGE using HeLa SCL as prey (B); 2D SDS-PAGE using STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 SCL as prey (C), 2D SDS-PAGE with STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 SCL as prey (D); probability based MOWSE score and parent MS and subsequent MS/MS spectra for HSP90AB1 (E). From the MOWSE score distribution, it is evident that the peptide mass fingerprint search identifying HSP90AB1 (MOWSE score 139) was significant (p≤0.05). MALDI spectra for 5 other proteins and details of MALDI-mass analyses for the identification of HYPK-interacting proteins are provided as , , , , and
respectively.
HYPK-interacting proteins identified in the present study and obtained earlier.
Validation of Novel Interactions of HYPK Identified in MS Experiments
We validated the interactions of HYPK with EEF1A1/EF1α, HSPA8/Hsc70, LMNB2/LaminB2 and CALM1/Calmodulin (, #3, 4, 5 and 11 respectively) by co-IP assay in Neuro2A cell lines. Co-localizations of HYPK with these proteins in Neuro2A cells were also detected using confocal imaging. Representative results for co-IP of endogenous HYPK with endogenous EEF1A1 along with co-localization of HYPK-GFP with EEF1A1-DsRed are shown in , panel A, where co-localized dots are visible in HYPK-EEF1A1 merged picture (R2 = 0.88). The co-IP blot was also re-probed with anti-HYPK antibody to confirm the presence of HYPK in the immunoprecipitated complex. Similar results obtained with three other proteins, viz., HSPA8, LMNB2 and CALM1 are shown in , panels B, C and D respectively. In all 3 cases, blots for HYPK-immunoprecipitates were probed with anti-DsRed antibody. In case of confocal imaging of LMNB2-DsRed with HYPK-GFP, co-localization was observed only in the dotted structures of LMNB2-DsRed. The squared Pearson correlation coefficient values (R2) for all co-localization experiments are shown in . Although co-localization between two cytosolic proteins may not be used as a method to validate their interaction, these positive imaging results supported our results of co-IP.
Validation of interaction by co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and confocal microscopy.Validation of interaction between HYPK and EEF1A1 by co-IP using anti-HYPK antibody (endogenous EEF1A1 was detected) along with subcellular co-localization of HYPK-GFP with EEF1A1-DsRed (A). The interaction of HYPK with HSPA8, LMNB2, CALM1, HSPA1A, VIM and MLF2 are shown (B, C, D, E, F and G respectively). The co-IP of Neuro2A SCL with anti-HYPK antibody precipitated endogenous HSPA1A (immunoblot probed with anti-HSPA1A; E). Anti-HYPK antibody was used to immunoprecipitate the HYPK-complex from Neuro2A SCL overexpressing HSPA8-DsRed (B), LMNB2-DsRed (C), CALM1-DsRed (D) or VIM-DsRed (F) and the immunoblots were probed with anti-DsRed antibody. Interaction between HYPK and MLF2 was confirmed by probing the HYPK-immunoprecipitated complex with anti-GFP antibody (G). The co-IP blots shown in A, E and F were re-probed with anti-HYPK antibody confirming HYPK in the immunoprecipitate. The dots showing co-localization of HYPK with EEF1A1 (A), LMNB2 (C) and MLF2 (G) are indicated by arrows. The immunoblot showing interaction between endogenous HYPK and endogenous HSPA1A was stripped and re-probed with anti-HIP1 antibody. The absence of HIP1 in the immunoprecipitate confirmed that HYPK did not interact with HIP1 (E). Scale bars (5 um) for the confocal images are indicated in each panel.
Squared values of the Pearson Correlation coefficient (Rp) for determination of co-localization of HYPK with its interacting partners.
Identification of HTT-interacting Proteins as Interacting Partners of HYPK
Among the HYPK-interacting proteins identified (as mentioned above), HSPA8 , EEF1A1
have been previously reported to interact with HTT and were also reviewed recently . Based on these observations, we hypothesized that other HTT-interacting proteins, especially the chaperones, might interact with HYPK. To test the hypothesis, we performed co-IP and also checked co-localization of HYPK with known HTT-interacting chaperones and non-chaperone proteins like HSP70/HSPA1A, HSP27/HSPB1, HCG3/DNAJB3, MLF1, MLF2, HIP1, TP53, p65/RELA subunit of NFκB
and the HD-associated protein VIM . It is known that HSF1 regulates the expression of heat shock proteins and also interacts with other chaperones. Exogenous expression of this protein reduces the aggregates formed by mutant HTT , . Thus, we also tested whether HYPK interacts with HSF1. We found that except for HIP1, a HTT-interacting protein, all the other HTT-interacting partners interacted with HYPK. Among these, interaction of endogenous HYPK with endogenous HSPA1A, VIM-DsRed and MLF2-GFP were confirmed by co-IP (, panel E, F and G respectively). For all these three cases, anti-HYPK antibody was used to immunoprecipitate the endogenous HYPK-complex, and the blots were probed with anti-HSPA1A, anti-DsRed and anti-GFP antibodies respectively. The blots were stripped and re-probed with anti-HYPK results showed the presence of HYPK in the immunoprecipitated complex. Significant co-localizations of HYPK with these three proteins were also observed in confocal imaging studies. The blot for HSPA1A was further probed with anti-HIP1 antibody which showed lack of interaction between HYPK and HIP1 (, panel E). Results obtained with the other HTT-interacting proteins mentioned above are shown in
and all R2 values for co-localization are shown in . Thus we further identified 9 additional HYPK-interacting proteins (, #29–37). To exclude the possibility that HYPK non-specifically interacts with other proteins, interaction of HIP1 with HYPK was further checked by independent IP experiments, pulling-down the HYPK-protein complex and probing with anti-HIP1 antibody. However, we could not find any interaction between HYPK and HIP1. HYPK and HIP1 were also not found to be co-localized (R2 = 0.37) (, panel G). This result suggests strongly that HYPK interacts specifically with its partners reported here.
Complex Formation by HYPK with its Interacting Partners
We performed IP of endogenous HYPK followed by native PAGE-western blot analysis of the immunoprecipitated complex as described earlier to detect protein complexes formed by HYPK. When Neuro2A cell extract was immunoprecipitated by anti-HYPK antibody, we detected EEF1A1 and HSPA1A as members of the high molecular weight complex at the top of the gel (, panels AI and AII respectively). When STHdhQ7/HdhQ7and STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 cell extracts were immunoprecipitated in a similar way, we detected HTT (, panel BII) and LMNB2 (, panel BI) in the high molecular weight complex. Endogenous LMNB2 was identified at a low molecular weight position. When re-probed with anti-HYPK antibody, we found HYPK in the same complex with HTT and LMNB2, whereas purified recombinant HYPK was observed at a much low molecular weight position (, panel BIII, first lane from left). The endogenous TP53 and RELA were also found to be components of the HYPK-complex (, panels CII and CIII) when cell extract of STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 was immunoprecipitated. Ponceau S staining of the membrane after western transfer shows that the proteins were not stuck to the wells but rather were present throughout the lanes (, panel CI). These results showed that in different neuronal cells, HYPK could form complex with interacting partners (HTT and LMNB2), (EEF1A1 and HSPA1A), and (TP53 and RELA).
Formation of high molecular weight HYPK-complex.High molecular weight HYPK-complex formation by endogenous HYPK with EEF1A1 (AI) and HSPA1A/HSP70 (AII) in Neuro2A cells using native-PAGE results obtained by similar experiments in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 and STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 with LMNB2 (BI) and HTT (BII); result obtained by re-probing the blot shown in B with anti-HYPK antibody is shown in BIII, showing the difference in migration of purified HYPK and complex-bound HYPK; similar co-IP experiments in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 (C) along with Ponceau staining of the nitrocellulose membrane (CI). The blot is probed with anti-TP53 (CII) and anti-RELA (CIII) antibodies. In all the cases, anti-HYPK antibody was used to pull-down and the immunoprecipitate elute was analyzed to detect the interacting proteins. The loading wells in A and C are marked by arrows.
Enrichment of GO Terms with the HYPK-interacting Proteins
Likelihood that a protein participates in a specific function, biological process or pathway increases if the interacting partner(s) of that particular protein is known to be involved in the same process or pathway . Thus to get more information about function(s) of HYPK, we analyzed 49 HYPK-interacting proteins (37 of these identified in this study and the other 12 identified earlier by different investigators) for the enrichment of GO terms using the freely available software, GeneCodis2 () ,
as described in the
section. Out of 49 HYPK-interacting proteins, 45 were over-represented in 47 different GO molecular function classes (corrected hyper geometric significance of ≤0.05). The GO term protein binding (MF, GO: 0005515) was found to be enriched with 29 out of the 47 HYPK-interacting protein-coding genes compared to 6618 among 29,095 genes coded by human genome, as cataloged in GeneCodis2. Similarly, the GO term unfolded protein binding (GO: 0051082) was significantly enriched with HYPK-interacting proteins DNAJC2, HSP90AB1, HSPA8 and CALR while DNA binding (GO:0003677) was found to be enriched with ZNF462, CHD3, NFκB (p65)/RELA, DNAJC2, MLF1, LBR, ZNF516, ZNF100, CALR and TP53. The complete list of these proteins is shown in .
Several GO terms (135) describing the biological processes were also found to be significantly enriched with the interacting partners of HYPK (). The GO biological process DNA-dependent transcription (GO: 0006355) were found to be enriched with TP53, CHD3, HSF1, RHOXF2, ZNF100 and CALR and cell cycle arrest (GO: 0007050) were enriched with TP53, MLF1, KIF20B and CALR. Such enrichment of various GO terms with the HYPK-interacting proteins indicates that HYPK through its interaction with other proteins might participate in various biological processes including DNA binding, protein folding, response to unfolded protein, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and transcription. It is important to validate such prediction by further experiments.
Pathway Analysis of HYPK-interacting Proteins
Biological pathway is defined as the series of sequential causal interactions that mediate the signals, generally from outside the cells, to travel within, and sometimes communicate between the cells and essentially control cellular behaviors. If a protein is involved in a specific biological pathway, its interacting partner is likely to participate in the same.
KEGG pathway analysis of HYPK-interacting proteins using GeneCodis2 revealed that 16 different pathways were significantly enriched with 45 proteins except PPP6R2, DNAJB3, NAA10, NAA15 and C15orf63/HYPK. For example, MAPK signaling pathway (KEGG, 04010) was significantly enriched with HYPK-interacting proteins RELA, HSPB1, TP53 and HSPA8 (p = 0.007). Other pathways significantly enriched with the HYPK-interacting proteins included Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis (KEGG, 00010), apoptosis (KEGG, 04210) and pathways in cancer (KEGG, 05200). The result is shown in . The Reactome pathway analysis revealed that HYPK-interacting partners were associated with pathways like regulation of mRNA stability, metabolism of RNA, carbohydrate metabolism, ubiquitination, muscle contraction, DNA damage response, TP53 stabilization, etc. The enrichment of 16 specific pathways in the Reactome database with 49 HYPK-interacting partners is provided in . Thus, bioinformatics analyses indicate that HYPK interactome participates in multiple molecular functions, biological processes and pathways.
Subcellular Localization and Expressions of Genes Coding for HYPK-interacting Partners in Brain
For functional interaction to be possible, HYPK and its interacting partner(s) should be expressed not only in the same cell/tissue but also in the same cellular compartment. HYPK is a HTT-interacting chaperone protein. So, for functional relevance in HD biology, both HYPK and its interacting partners should be expressed in the human brain. To check this out, we utilized various databases like BioMart, TiGER and Nextprot that catalogue the expression of genes. Among 50 proteins (49 HYPK-interacting proteins and HYPK itself), expressions of 48 in the brain were described in at least one of the three databases (). Since expression of HYPK was identified only in TiGER, we searched other resources and observed that the expression of HYPK/C15orf63 (Affimatrix ID 218680_x_at) has been identified in human brain in many studies and also reported in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Similarly, in GEO database, expressions of GC and ATP6V0A4 were reported. Thus, HYPK and its interacting partners are likely to be expressed in human brain, although to different extents. Localizations of HYPK and its interacting partners were also determined using the Nextprot database. HYPK was found to be a cytosolic protein according to this database. It has been reported earlier that HYPK is associated with ribosomes , . Among others, information on LENG8, DNAJB3 and MYOM3 were not available in the database. Sixteen proteins, including HYPK, were observed only in cytoplasm including mitochondria, golgi and endoplasmic reticulum. Group-specific component (vitamin D binding protein) GC is a secreted protein. Eleven proteins were identified only in nucleus and 19 were detected both in cytoplasm and nucleus (). Thus, 34 proteins all together could be identified in cytoplasm. Although requires further evidence, it is possible that HYPK might move to the nucleus by interacting with the proteins that can shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm. It remains to be found out whether HYPK can also be localized within mitochondria. The expression of HYPK and its interacting proteins in the brain, and localization of many proteins in cytoplasm indicate that HYPK interactome identified in this article could be functional in brain and that most of such interactions possibly occur in cytoplasm.
Downregulation of HYPK in Neuronal Cell Lines
To test experimentally whether HYPK participates in cell growth, cell cycle regulation, misfolded protein responses and cell death, we knocked down or overexpressed HYPK in cells and studied the responses. We used antisense HYPK as described in the
section to downregulate HYPK in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7and Neuro2A cells. In Neuro2A cells, expression of the antisense HYPK construct significantly decreased HYPK expression at both mRNA (p = 0.04, n = 4) and protein (p = 0.04, n = 2) levels (, panel A). Significant downregulation of HYPK both in the mRNA (p = 0.03, n = 4) and protein (p = 0.003, n = 2) levels was also observed in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells (, panel B).To find out the specificity of such downregulation, we overexpressed HYPK-GFP in these HYPK downregulated Neuro2A cells and detected expression of HYPK mRNA (, lane 3 from the left). Exogenous HYPK could significantly recover the decreased expression of HYPK at mRNA level (p = 0.02, n = 4).
Preparation of HYPK knock-down neuronal cell lines using the antisense construct (HYPK-U61).Validation of HYPK knock-down in mRNA and protein levels in Neuro2A (A) and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 (B) cell lines. Expression of both mRNA and protein levels were measured by RT-PCR or SDS-PAGE western analysis in these HYPK knocked-down stable mouse cell lines. Upon exogenous expression of 83Q-DsRed in a dose dependent manner (100 ng and 200 ng), the percentage of cells containing mutant HTT aggregates in presence and absence of endogenous HYPK in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cell lines are compared (C). The ‘n’ and ‘p’ values for Student’s two-tailed t test are indicated in the bar diagrams along with the mean and standard deviation.
We have shown earlier that overexpression of HYPK in neuronal as well as non-neuronal cells reduces the aggregates formed by the N-terminal mutant HTT coded by exon1 of HTT gene with expanded CAG repeats . It is thus expected that reduction of endogenous HYPK would increase aggregates formed by the N-terminal mutant HTT. Expression of N-terminal HTT with 83Q in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells increased aggregate formation in a dose dependent manner (, panel C). When we transfected STHdhQ7/HdhQ7-U61 (control) and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 HYPK-U61 cells with 100 ng of 83Q-DsRed, we observed a significant 9% increase (p = 0.01, n = 3) in the number of aggregates in cells with reduced HYPK expression. Number of aggregates was increased by 16.6% (p = 0.04, n = 3) upon transfection with 200 ng of 83Q-DsRed. Similar result was also reported earlier in human non-neuronal cells, where reduction of endogenous HYPK increased the aggregates formed by mutant HTT . This result further confirmed that antisense construct reduced the endogenous expression of HYPK.
HYPK Downregulation Reduces Cell Growth
Neuro2A cells and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells with reduced HYPK expressions grew slowly compared to that of the control Neuro2A-U61 and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7-U61 cells respectively. The average time required for doubling the cell numbers in Neuro2A-U61 and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7-U61 cells was ~28 h and ~30 h respectively, while in cells with reduced HYPK, these values were ~34 h and ~38 h respectively. Thus, reduction of endogenous HYPK slowed down cell growth. Exogenous expression of HYPK-GFP recovered the reduced cell growth observed in HYPK downregulated cells. The doubling time for Neuro2A and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells co-expressing HYPK-U61 and HYPK-GFP was found to be ~27 h and ~31 h respectively. HSPA8, a HYPK-interacting chaperone, could also recover the defects in cell growth caused by HYPK knock-down. Doubling time for HYPK downregulated Neuro2A and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells overexpressing HSPA8-DsRed was ~27 h and ~30 h respectively (, panels A and B). The mean values and standard deviations for each data point are provided in .
Cell growth and cell survival in presence and absence of HYPK.Comparison of the growth curves of control and HYPK downregulated Neuro2A (A) and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 (B) cell lines and effect of exogenous expression of HYPK-DsRed and HSPA8-DsRed in these HYPK knocked-down neuronal cell lines. Comparison of BrdU incorporation in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells overexpressing DsRed and HYPK-DsRed in a dose dependent manner (transfection with 300 ng and 500 ng of plasmid) (C). The difference in BrdU incorporation in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells in absence of HYPK and in presence of HYPK as well as HSPA8 (500 ng) are shown (D). The effect of mutant Htt (83Q-DsRed) on cell survival of control and HYPK downregulated STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells and its effect in presence of exogenous addition of HYPK-DsRed in these cells are shown (E). Flow cytometry analysis showing distribution of STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells in different phases of cell cycle (upon 7-AAD staining) in presence and absence of HYPK (F). The cell cycle analysis was performed using CellQuest Pro software as described in
section.The ‘n’ and ‘p’ values for Student’s two-tailed t test are indicated in the bar diagrams along with the mean and standard deviation. The distributions of cell population in different phases are provided in .
Distribution of cell populations in different cell cycle phases in presence and absence of HYPK in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cell lines.BrdU cell proliferation assay revealed that incorporation of BrdU increased significantly upon transfection with 300 ng of HYPK-DsRed in the parental STHdhQ7/HdhQ7cells as compared to cells transfected with the same amount of DsRed vector (p = 0.04, n = 3). Such significant increase in BrdU incorporation was also observed when we overexpressed 500 ng of HYPK-DsRed in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7cells (p = 0.002, n = 3) (, panel C). We also observed that downregulation of HYPK in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells reduced cell proliferation significantly (p = 0.006, n = 3). This reduction in cell proliferation could also be rescued by exogenous expression of HYPK-DsRed (p = 0.001, n = 3) or HSPA8-DsRed (p = 0.001, n = 3) (, panel D). Thus the difference in BrdU incorporation in control and HYPK downregulated STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells supported our observations shown in panels A and B of .
Role of HYPK in Cell Death
We further tested whether reduced expression of HYPK affected cell death induced by N-terminal mutant HTT with 83 Q repeats. We have shown earlier that overexpression of HYPK protected cells from death induced by mutant N-terminal HTT . Reduction of endogenous HYPK increased the toxicity (decreased the survival) in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells. In MTT assay, cell survival was about 73% in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells expressing the control vector (U61), while this value was about 55% in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells expressing HYPK-U61 (antisense construct). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02, n = 3). Overexpression of 83Q-DsRed in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells with endogenous HYPK reduced cell survival to 51% (p = 0.01, n = 3) and in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells with decreased HYPK to 41% (p = 0.003, n = 3). Co-expression of the N-terminal mutant HTT and HYPK-DsRed in STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells recovered the toxicity significantly (73% p = 0.001, n = 3). Overexpression of HYPK-DsRed in HYPK downregulated STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells increased survival from 41% to 47% (p = 0.05, n = 3). This result, shown in , panel E, indicated that HYPK is involved in the recovery of cell death under normal condition or general stress induced by the mutant HTT.
Role of HYPK in Cell Cycle Regulation
The GO terms related to cell cycle were found to be significantly enriched with HYPK-interacting proteins (). To test the role of HYPK in cell cycle regulation, we analyzed the distribution of cells in different phases of cell cycle. In asynchronously growing STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 cells transfected with the control vectors, proportion of cells in G0/G1, S, G2/M and sub G1 were (55.0±0.3%), (35.6±0.2%), (6.0±0.1%) and (0.5±0.5%) respectively. In cells with reduced HYPK (STHdhQ7/HdhQ7-HYPK-U61), the proportion of cells in sub G1 increased significantly (p = 0.01, n = 2), while that in S phase decreased significantly (p&0.0001, n = 2). This increase in the sub G1 cells indicates that these cells were undergoing apoptosis. These abnormalities could be partially rescued by overexpressing HYPK-GFP in these HYPK knocked-down cells (). Results of a typical experiment is shown in , panel F. It is interesting to note that reduction of endogenous HYPK resulted in a decreased number of cells in S phase. This result is similar to that observed in BrdU incorporation assay where exogenous expression of HYPK was able to rescue the observed cell cycle abnormalities in cells with reduced HYPK. This result showed that HYPK was able to regulate distribution of cells in different phases of cell cycle and supported the inferences made by enrichment analysis of the HYPK-interacting proteins in different biological processes described above. Similar observation of accumulation of cells in sub G0/G1 phase by downregulating HYPK has also been made earlier in HeLa cells . Additionally, we showed in this article that distribution of cells in different phases of cell cycle was also altered in presence and absence of HYPK.
Recovery of Heat-stressed Luciferase Activities in Presence and Absence of HYPK
The GO analysis of HYPK-interacting partners revealed that GO terms for molecular functions like protein folding (GO: 0006457) and response to unfolded protein (GO: 0006986) were enriched significantly (). Thus, we tested whether HYPK is involved in unfolded protein response using the luciferase reporter assay after heat shock following the methods described earlier . We also tested whether some of the interacting partners of HYPK were involved in such processes.
As mentioned in the
section, Tet+ Luc+ve Neuro2A-U61 (control) and Tet+ Luc+ve Neuro2A-HYPK U61 (HYPK downregulated) cells were transfected with empty DsRed, HYPK-DsRed or other HYPK-interactors cloned in DsRed. We compared the luciferase activities of these cells in conditions (i) without heat shock (No HS), (ii) immediately after heat shock (HS) and (iii) 6 h of growth following heat shock (HS+R). Even without heat shock, the reporter luciferase activity was decreased significantly (p = 0.007, n = 3) in Neuro2A HYPK-U61 cells as compared to Neuro2A-U61 cells (, panel A). Overexpression of HYPK-DsRed in Neuro2A-U61 cells resulted in a significant increase in the luciferase activity (p&0.0001, n = 3) as compared to that of DsRed transfected control (Neuro2A-U61) cells (, panel A). When HYPK-DsRed was overexpressed in Tet+Luc+ve Neuro2A-HYPK U61 cells, the luciferase activity was also increased significantly (p&0.0001, n = 3) (, panel A), compared to that obtained in HYPK downregulated cells.
Effect of HYPK on recovery of heat denatured luciferase activity.The in vivo chaperone activities of Neuro2A-U61 and Neuro2A HYPK-U61 cells in presence and absence of HYPK (before administration of heat shock) are compared (A). As mentioned in the
section, the cells were subjected to heat shock at 43°C for 1 h (HS) and re-incubated at 37°C CO2 incubator for the next 6h (HS+R). In every case, heat shock was administered 24h post-transfection of Tet+Luc+ve cells with experimental constructs. Comparison of luciferase activities in Neuro2A-U61 cells in presence and absence of HYPK-DsRed in No HS, immediately after heat shock (HS) and HS+R conditions (B). These luciferase activities were also compared upon overexpression of HSPA8-DsRed and 3 other HYPK partners in Neuro2A-U61 cells (B). Such drop and recovery of the luciferase activities upon heat treatment of HYPK downregulated Neuro2A (Neuro2A-HYPK U61) cells and effect of HYPK and its interacting partners are shown (C). The ‘n’ and ‘p’ values for Student’s two-tailed t test are indicated in the bar diagrams along with the mean and standard deviation.
Immediately after heat treatment (43°C for 1h), luciferase activities were decreased. We measured the decrease and recovery of luciferase activities in all the above mentioned conditions. As evident from , panel B, immediately after heat shock (HS), the luciferase activity dropped to 35.4% (p = 0.003, n = 3) and 57.1% (p = 0.02, n = 3) of the initial values obtained without heat shock (No HS) in Neuro2A-U61 cells overexpressing DsRed and HYPK-DsRed respectively. After 6 h of recovery following heat treatment (HS+R), Neuro2A-U61 cells overexpressing DsRed and HYPK-DsRed recovered these drop in luciferase activities to about 19.7% (p = 0.11, n = 3) and 32.4% (p = 0.02, n = 3) of the values obtained immediately after heat shock (HS); suggesting the importance of HYPK in facilitating the refolding of heat-denatured luciferase (, panel B). This result was further supported by the observation that in HYPK downregulated Neuro2A cell extract (Neuro2A-HYPK U61), the drop in the reporter luciferase activity immediately after heat shock (HS) (p = 0.004, n = 3) could not be recovered even after re-incubation for 6 h. However, when HYPK-DsRed was overexpressed in Neuro2A-HYPK U61 cells, we observed a marginal significant recovery (p = 0.07, n = 3) of 36% of the luciferase activity (, panel C). HSPA8 was found to recover the drop in luciferase activities in both Neuro2A-U61 (35.7% recovery, p = 0.02, n = 3, , panel B) and Neuro2A-HYPK U61 cell extracts (24.1% recovery, p = 0.06, n = 3, , panel C). Two other interacting partners of HYPK, viz., EEF1A1 and CALM1, when overexpressed in Neuro2A-U61 cells, were able to recover significantly the unfolded luciferase activities, although to different extents (, panel B). However, the presence of HYPK was necessary for such recovery (, panel C). The error bars in all the diagrams denote standard deviations, and Student’s unpaired two tailed t tests were performed to determine statistical significance as mentioned above.
DiscussionIn the present communication, we showed that HYPK, an intrinsically unstructured protein with chaperone-like activity, interacted with 36 novel proteins (, #2–37). HTT and 4 other proteins are known to interact with HYPK (, # 1 and 38–41), while 8 proteins were identified in yeast two-hybrid assays earlier by other investigators (, # 42–49). Among the 36 proteins identified as HYPK partners in this study, 13 were confirmed by other method(s) (3 proteins among these were identified in more than one independent experiment). Among the rest of the HYPK-interacting proteins, TPI1, CEP290 and HSP90AB1were also identified in more than one independent pull-down experiment (). Cell extracts from various mammalian cell lines viz., HeLa, Neuro2A and STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 and STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 were used in pull-down and co-IP experiments. HYPK being a HTT-interacting protein, the interacting partners of HYPK identified using SCL from STHdhQ7/HdhQ7 and STHdhQ111/HdhQ111 as prey might have r}

我要回帖

更多关于 莲花和荷花有什么区别 的文章

更多推荐

版权声明:文章内容来源于网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请点击这里与我们联系,我们将及时删除。

点击添加站长微信