1.72gb等于多少mbb 谢谢啦！
点击联系发帖人
时间：2015-02-17 16:31
请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?-中国学网-中国IT综合门户网站
> 请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?
请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?
转载 编辑：李强
为了帮助网友解决“请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?”相关的问题，中国学网通过互联网对“请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?”相关的解决方案进行了整理,用户详细问题包括:RT,我想知道:请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?，具体解决方案如下：解决方案1：1kb=1024b。所以电脑配件说是500。 1MB=1024KB。1b=8bit，是1G=1000MB。 但是电脑磁盘计算的话计算的方式是 1G=1024MB解决方案2：1MB=1024KB：1TB=1024MB,1KB=1024B电脑存储量的换算都是1024，如解决方案3：1GB = 1024 MB解决方案4：1G=1024MB解决方案5：1G=1024MB通过对数据库的索引,我们还为您准备了：答：1G=24kb 说是这样 可有时候并不是这样的 根据实际情况===========================================问：问题是 电脑硬盘分配的磁盘容量 1：9.76GB等于多少MB 等于多少KB？ 2：4...答：1.=9994.24MB=KB 2.=4894.2MB=KB 3.=44544MB=KB===========================================问：我最近在下载Q，QQ下载说磁盘空间不足，本人还是小孩，对电脑不了解，可...答：1GB等于1024M 这时候显示磁盘不足并不是空间的问题===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：1GB=1024MB（理论上） 计算机存储信息的大小，最基本的单位是字节，一个汉字由两个字节组成，字母和数字由一个字节组成。 容量的单位从小到大依次是：字节（B）、KB、MB、GB、TB。它们之间的关系是。 1TB=1024GB 1GB=1024MB 1MB=1024KB 1KB=1024...===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：1024MB===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：PC电脑 : 容量 硬盘\内存是个人电脑中存储数据的重要部件，其容量就决定着个人电脑的数据存储量大小的能力，这也就是用户购买硬盘所首先要注意的参数之一。 硬盘的容量是以MB（兆）和GB（千兆）为单位的，早期的硬盘容量低下，大多以MB（兆）为...===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：兄弟啊，C盘是系统盘！ 系统运行全靠C盘的 一般里边不建议放除了运行系统需要以外的所有东西的 会退累电脑的运行速度的！ C盘一般要留10G的容量至少吧 基本上有8G左右要空着的 方便平时数据转移和提高电脑的运行速度 你留100MB空间够干什么的啊 ...===========================================问：有人知道的回答下答：1GB=1024MB 14GB=14*MB 应该是这个===========================================商家弄的硬盘是 1000MB 照书上的是1024===========================================最低配置:CPU PIII-500MHz 以上 内存 128M以上 2.4G硬盘空间 支持DirectX 7.0以上及DirectSound声卡 鼠标、键盘 推荐配置:64K/bps以上的上网环境 CPU 1G Hz以...===========================================经过几个小时的使用,基本上记数器已经可以对你的使用情况做出一个完整的评估。 5.... GB,那么为了节省硬盘空间,完全可以把分页文件最大值缩小为512MB大小。而对于最小...===========================================MB=1024KB 1GB=1024MB 顺便告诉你:GB后面还有 1TB=1024GB 1PB=1024TB 1EB=1024PB 1ZB=1024EB 1YB=1024ZB 所谓"b"(bit),是一个2进制数,是电脑...=========================================== 但是计算计算机硬件储存量大小时,为了计算方便一般就按照1GB=1000MB 1MB=100... 250GB=KB 如果来计算硬盘空间大小的话4GB=GB=250000...===========================================数量 单价 CPU AMD 速龙II X4 651/盒装 ￥ 460 主板* 双敏UA75GT-S全固态EVO版 ... 4G ￥ 140 硬盘 希捷Barracuda G单碟 ￥ 410 显卡 蓝宝HD6670 1GB G...===========================================会调用512M的硬盘空间做虚拟内存.肯定比物理内存慢,所以读盘会读很久很久=========================================== 512*===========================================扫雷和纸牌这种大型游戏不适合你这种低配置电脑玩,会很卡===========================================我的电脑经常被提醒c盘磁盘空间不够,要怎样做才能避免呢?我的电脑是1GB的。谢谢了。 童揪沸恼卧竟片降摇任===========================================
本文欢迎转载，转载请注明：转载自中国学网： []
用户还关注
可能有帮助100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB-中国学网-中国IT综合门户网站
> 100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB
100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB
转载 编辑：李强
为了帮助网友解决“100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=”相关的问题，中国学网通过互联网对“100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=”相关的解决方案进行了整理,用户详细问题包括:RT,我想知道:100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB，具体解决方案如下：解决方案1：100M网速的话，理论上市100 / 8 = 12.5M每秒的速度解决方案2：是不是就是10MB那样，为什么要除以8呢，100M=12.5MB解决方案3：100M其实是100M Byte，我们所说的网速是指的Bit而1Bit = 8 Byte，所以100M其实是12.5M的网速解决方案4：我测试速度，你说的12.5M是不是就是测试网速12.5MB解决方案5：是啊！360测速的话，应该是显示10M以上专线！解决方案6：谢谢!解决方案7：1兆=1024kb=1mb,由此可知100兆网速=100mb解决方案8：100Mbps=12.5M/s ~解决方案9：是不是就是10MB那样解决方案10：应该在10M/s以上。解决方案11：也就是说测试网速正常显示是不是应该在10MB以上解决方案12：对 ~通过对数据库的索引,我们还为您准备了：按理论来讲 & 兆数和实际流量比例为10:1左右 & 就是说1M网速在1秒100kb左右 & 其实在100M的网速下 &网速已经没有意义 了 & &一般的机...===========================================所谓的100m宽带不过是噱头罢了,毕竟不是专线,再上网高峰期时候更是不可能达到100m的速度,有一半就不错了。理论上100m的宽带来算,你的下载速率为12.5m/s,你这个一半...===========================================1MB,100MB那是百兆光纤拉。。。===========================================2兆网速等于2048kbps 1KB=1024B 1MB=1024KB 1GB=1024MB 1G=24KB,1KB=1024字节===========================================以太网总线等。Bps:字节每秒,通常对于并行总线设备使用Bps为单位,如并口,IDE硬盘等。换算关系:100Mbps=12.5MB/s一般来说,如果我们说网速为100兆,指的是100兆bps。如...===========================================1mb=mb=100*1024kb===========================================正常情况4兆网速下载1gb需要45分钟或者不到1小时。 依次类推500M 需 25分钟或半小时。 100M需 6分钟左右。 2GB 需 1个半到2小时。 3GB 需 2个半小时左右。 网速...===========================================1M(bps)=125kb/s===========================================这么简单还用问?如果你用的是专线那你的20兆网速等于20M网速就是正确的。(机关,单位,网吧)都是专线的! 如果你拉的是宽带,20M你的下载速度最多也就2-3M的速度。(这就...===========================================迅雷下载一般不会过125KB。最快的时候就是110左右,正常速度是100+。这个跟内存和系统没关系,只跟带宽有关。2兆的也只有220左右。。。===========================================
本文欢迎转载，转载请注明：转载自中国学网： []
用户还关注
可能有帮助查看: 6816|回复: 5
关于网络的速度，比如大B，小b ，多少多少M 是什么意思！ 详解
签到天数: 1367 天[LV.10]以坛为家III
1.计算光纤传输的真实速度
&&使用光纤连接网络具有传输速度快。衰减少等特点。因此很多公司的网络出口都使用光纤。一般网络服务商声称光纤的速度为“ 5M”，那么他的下载真实速度是多少那？我们来计算一下，一般的情况下，“5M”实际上就是5000Kbit/s(按千进位计算）这就存在一个换算的问题。Byte和bit是不同的。1Byte=8bit.而我们常说的下载速度都指的是Byte/s 。因此电信所说的“5M”经过还换算后就成为了（5000/8）KByte/s= 625KByte/s这样我们平时下载速度最高就是625KByte/s，常常表示625KB/S。
&&在实际的情况中，理论值最高为625KB/S。那么还要排除网络损耗以及线路衰减等原因因此真正的下载速度可能还不到600KB/S 不过只要是550KB/S以上都算正常。
2.计算ADSL的真实速度
&&ADSL是大家经常使用的上网方式。那么电信和网通声称的“512K”ADSL下载速度是多少？
换算方法为512Kbit/s=(512/8)KByte/s=64KByte/s,考虑线路等损耗实际的下载速度在50KB/S以上就算正常了 那么“1MB”那？大家算算吧答案是125KByte/s
3.计算内网的传输速度
经常有人抱怨内网的传输的数度慢，那么真实情况下的10/100Mbps网卡的速度应该有多快？网卡的100Mbps同样是以bit/s来定义的，所以100Mb/S＝100000KByte/s=()KByte/s=12500KByte/s 。在理论上1秒钟可以传输12.5MB的速据，考虑到干扰的因素，每秒传输只要超过10MB就是正常了。现在出现了1000Mbps的网卡，那么速度就是100MB/S 。特别提示：
&&1.关于bit(比特)/second(秒)与Byte(字节)/s(秒)的换算说明：线路单位是bps，表示bit(比特)/second(秒)，注意是小写字母b；用户在网上下载时显示的速率单位往往是Byte(字节)/s(秒)，注意是大写字母B。字节和比特之间的关系为1Byte=8Bits；再加上IP包头、HTTP包头等因网络传输协议增加的传输量，显示1KByte/s下载速率时，线路实际传输速率约10kbps。例如：下载显示是50KByte/s时，实际已经达到了500Kbps的速度。切记注意单位！！！
&&2.用户申请的宽带业务速率指技术上所能达到的最大理论速率值，用户上网时还受到用户电脑软硬件的配置、所浏览网站的位置、对端网站带宽等情况的影响，故用户上网时的速率通常低于理论速率值。
&&3.理论上：2M（即2Mb/s）宽带理论速率是：256KB/s（即2048Kb/s），实际速率大约为103--200kB/s；(其原因是受用户计算机性能、网络设备质量、资源使用情况、网络高峰期、网站服务能力、线路衰耗，信号衰减等多因素的影响而造成的)。4M（即4Mb/s）的宽带理论速率是：512KB/s，实际速率大约为200---440kB/s。&&
基础知识：
在计算机科学中，bit是表示信息的最小单位，叫做二进制位；一般用0和1表示。Byte叫做字节，由8个位（8bit）组成一个字节(1Byte)，用于表示计算机中的一个字符。bit与Byte之间可以进行换算，其换算关系为：1Byte=8bit（或简写为：1B=8b）；在实际应用中一般用简称，即1bit简写为1b(注意是小写英文字母b)，1Byte简写为1B（注意是大写英文字母B）。
&&在计算机网络或者是网络运营商中，一般，宽带速率的单位用bps(或b/s)表示；bps表示比特每秒即表示每秒钟传输多少位信息，是bit per second的缩写。在实际所说的1M带宽的意思是1Mbps（是兆比特每秒Mbps不是兆字节每秒MBps）。
&&建议用户记住以下换算公式：
& && &&&1B= 8b1B/s=8b/s( 或& /FONT&1Bps=8bps)
& && &&&1KB=1024B& &&&1KB/s=1024B/s
& && &&&1MB=1024KB& &&&1MB/s=1024KB/s
规范提示：实际书写规范中B应表示Byte(字节)，b应表示bit(比特)，但在平时的实际书写中有的把bit和Byte都混写为b ，如把Mb/s和MB/s都混写为Mb/s，导致人们在实际计算中因单位的混淆而出错。切记注意！！！
4Mbps=4000Kbps/8bit=500KB/S，少了个K&
你举的那几个例子，后面错了几个，网络传输中的通常单位换算，1Gbps=1000Mbps=Kbps=00bps，对应Byte（字节）：125M/S。电信4Mbps宽带为4000bps/8b=500KB/S，非512KB/S。计算机内部才2^10=1024&
经验值 +15
网盟有您更精彩！
网盟有您更精彩！
签到天数: 5 天[LV.2]偶尔看看I
帮顶&&不错
签到天数: 1342 天[LV.10]以坛为家III
普及一下知识&&
签到天数: 750 天[LV.10]以坛为家III
感谢兄弟。
签到天数: 603 天[LV.9]以坛为家II
好帖 学习了 呵呵
签到天数: 218 天[LV.7]常住居民III
网盟推荐 /1
天下网盟自2012年5月正式上线以来，一直以打造优质服务与信誉为宗旨，这几年一直得到网盟会员的大力支持。截至，网盟增值平台注册用户突破30000大关。
Powered by&& 查看话题
求助文献一篇，急用！先谢谢大家了
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp0622381
Novel Photocatalysts for the Decomposition of Organic Dyes Based on Metal-Organic Framework Compounds
怎么给你啊？把你的邮箱告诉我吧，我已经把文献下好了。 AbstractThree novel metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) 2, 1, 2·H2O, 2, and 2, 3, with three-dimensional structures have been synthesized and characterized. The structures of the three compounds appear somewhat related, formed by the connectivity involving the metal polyhedra (Co4N trigonal bipyramids in 1, NiO4N2 octahedra in 2, and ZnO4 tetrahedra and ZnO3N2 trigonal bipyramids in 3), 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoate), and 4,4‘-bipyridine. The photocatalytic studies on 1−3 indicate that they are active catalysts for the degradation of orange G, rhodamine B, Remazol Brilliant Blue R and methylene blue. The compounds have also been characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, IR, thermogravitmetric analysis, UV−vis, photoluminescence, and magnetic studies.
Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableIntroduction
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metal-organic framework (MOF) coordination polymers have received great attention due to their many potential applications ranging from catalysis, gas absorption, molecular recognition, optics, and so on.1-6 The continuing interest in this area is also due to their fascinating structures and many possible metal−ligand coordinations, as well as the aforementioned properties tunable through the variation of building blocks and reaction conditions. Most of the work reported in the literature, in general, concentrated on the benzene dicarboxylates7-15 or pyridine dicarboxylates16-18 of transition elements. Recently, diphenylene dicarboxylates have been shown to give rise to interesting structures with properties.19,20 We have been interested in the study of benzene dicarboxylate based coordination polymers of lanthanides and related systems, resulting in many interesting structures.21,22 In continuation of this theme, we are now studying the reactions involving 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid). As a dicarboxylate ligand, the 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoate) (OBA) appears to possess the following interesting structural characteristics:  (a) There are two carboxyl groups with a 180° angle separated by an oxygen and a benzene ring, which would reduce the steric interference/hindrance. (b) This compound can form rigid frameworks with large channels. (c) This provides an opportunity to study the relative torsional displacement of the benzene rings with respect to the central oxygen atom. The investigations using the oxybis(benzoic acid) as the ligand in the construction of metal-organic framework compounds have been quite limited,23-25 which prompted us to study this ligand in detail. Photocatalysis is being used for the green ecological elimination of organic compounds or harmful pollutants,26,27 but it is also attracting increasing interest as a potentially clean and renewable source for hydrogen fuel by splitting of water into H2 and O2 by means of solar-to-chemical conversion.28-30 The typical solid photocatalysts commonly used are semiconductor metal oxide and sulfide particles such as TiO2, ZnO, WO3, CdS, ZnS, and Fe2O3; layered ni and polyoxometalates (POM), mainly of W.26,27,31-35 On the other hand, it is also of interest to search for new photocatalytic materials with improved properties. In this context, the photocatalytic activities of hybrid compounds containing carboxylate ligand are just beginning to emerge.36-38 We have now isolated three new three-dimensional (3D) framework structures, 2, 1, 2·H2O, 2, and 2, 3, employing 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid), 4,4‘-bipyridine, and the corresponding metal salts. The structures of the three compounds appear somewhat related formed by the connectivity involving the metal polyhedra (CoO4N trigonal bipyramids in 1, NiO4N2 octahedra in 2, and ZnO4 tetrahedra and ZnO3N2 trigonal bipyramids in 3) and the 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoate) anions (OBA). The 4,4‘-bpy acts as a ligand connecting the metal centers in all the compounds. The photocatalytic studies, at room temperature, indicate all three compounds are active for the photodegradation of four commonly used dyes (orange G (OG), rhodamine B (RhB), Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR), and methylene blue (MB)) in the textile industry. The order of photodegradation of the four dyes follows the reverse order of their band gap. In this paper, we present the synthesis, structure, and photocatalytic studies of structures 1−3. Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableExperimental Section
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Materials. The compounds needed for the synthesis of the three coordination polymers, Co (NO3)2·6H2O, Ni (NO3)2·6H2O, and Zn (NO3)2·6H2O (Ranbaxy, 99%), 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) (Lancaster, 99%), 4,4‘-bipyridine (98%), piperazine (Aldrich, 99.99%), NaOH (S. D. Fine-Chem. Ltd, India, 99%) and the organic dyes for the photocatalytic experiments, orange G, rhodamine B, Remazol Brilliant Blue R, and methylene blue (Merck, India), were used as received. The water used was double distilled filtered through a Millipore membrane. Synthesis and Initial Characterization. The two compounds were synthesized by employing hydrothermal methods. In a typical synthesis, for 1, Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.146 g, 0.5 mM) was dissolved in 8 mL of 0.125 M NaOH solution. 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) (OBA, 0.1304 g, 0.5 mM) and 4,4‘-bipyridine (4,4‘-bpy, 0.08 g, 0.5 mM) were then added, with continuous stirring, and the mixture was homogenized at room temperature for 30 min. The final mixture was sealed in a 23 mL PTFE-lined stainless steel acid digestion autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 72 h. The initial and final pH values of the reaction mixture were 5.5 and 5, respectively. The final product, containing large quantities of violet rectangular crystals only, was filtered, washed with deionized water under vacuum, and dried at ambient conditions (yield 70% based on Co). For 2, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.075 g, 0.25 mmol) was dissolved in 3 mL of water along with 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) (4,4‘-OBA, 0.0652 g, 0.25 mmol), piperazine (0.0218 g, 0.25 mmol), and 4,4‘-bipyridine (4,4‘-bipy, 0.04 g, 0.25 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated in a 7 mL autoclave at 180 °C for 72 h. The initial pH of the reaction mixture was 5.5, and there was no change of pH in the final solution. The green color, cubic-like crystals were filtered, washed with water, and dried at ambient conditions (yield 75% based on Ni). For 3, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (0.152 g, 0.5 mM) was dissolved in 8 mL of water. OBA (0.1304 g, 0.5 mM), NaOH (0.04 g, 1 mM), and 4,4‘-bipyridine (0.08 g, 0.5 mM) were added subsequently, and the mixture was sealed in 23 mL PTFE-lined acid digestion autoclaves and heated at 150 °C for 120 h. The initial pH of the reaction mixture was 5.5, and no appreciable change in pH was noted after the reaction. The product contained large quantities of colorless, rodlike crystals only. The crystals were filtered, washed with water, and dried at ambient conditions (yield 75% based on Zn). The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on crushed single crystals in the 2θ range 5−50° using Cu Kα radiation. The XRD patterns indicated that the product the patterns were entirely consistent with the simulated XRD patterns generated based on the structures determined using single-crystal XRD. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been carried out (Metler-Toledo) in air (flow rate = 50 mL/min) in the temperature range 30&# °C (heating rate = 5 °C/min). The studies indicate that all the compounds show one major weight loss in the range 350&# °C. The total observed weight losses of 81.5 and 77%, in the cases of 1 and 3, correspond well with the loss of the OBA anion and 4,4‘-bpy (calcd 82%, 80%). For 2, the total observed weight loss of 83% corresponds to the loss of OBA anion, 4,4-bpy, and lattice water (calcd 84.5%). The final calcined product was found to be crystalline by powder XRD and correspond to Co3O4 (JCPDS:), NiO (JCPDS:	), and ZnO (JCPDS:), respectively. IR spectroscopic studies have been carried out in the mid-IR region as a KBr pellet (Bruker IFS-66v). The results indicate characteristic sharp lines with almost similar bands. Minor variations in the bands have been noticed between the compounds (Table 1).
Table 1:  Observed IR bands for 1, {2}, 2, {2·H2O}, and 3, {2}
bands 1 (cm-1) 2 (cm-1) 3 (cm-1)&&
νas(O−H)&¬ observed&&;(s)&¬ observed&&
νs(C−H)aromatic&&;(w)&&;(m)&&;(w)&&
νs(CO)&&;(m)&&;(m)&&;(s)&&
δ(H2O)&¬ observed&&;(s)&¬ observed&&
νs(C−C)skeletal&&;(m)&&;(m)&&;(m)&&
δ(COO)&&;(s)&&;(s)&&;(s)&&
δ(CHaromatic)in-of-plane&&;(s)&&;(m)&&;(m)&&
δ(C−N)skeletal&&879 (s)&&879 (m)&&879 (s)&&
δ(CHaromatic)out-of-plane&&780 (s)&&780 (w)&&780 (s)
Single-Crystal Structure Determination. A suitable single crystal of each compound was carefully selected under a polarizing microscope and glued to a thin glass fiber. Crystal structure determination by X-ray diffraction was performed on a Siemen's Smart-CCD diffractometer equipped with a normal focus and 2.4 kW sealed tube X-ray source (Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073&A) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. An empirical absorption correction based on symmetry equivalent reflections was applied using the SADABS program.39 The structure was solved and refined using the SHELXTL-PLUS suite of programs.40 All the hydrogen atoms of the carboxylic acids were initially located in the difference Fourier maps, and for the final refinement, the hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically ideal positions and held in the riding mode. The hydrogen atoms of the water molecule were not located in the difference Fourier maps. Final refinement included atomic positions for all the atoms, anisotropic thermal parameters for all the non-hydrogen atoms, and isotropic thermal parameters for all the hydrogen atoms. Full-matrix least-squares refinement against |F|2 was carried out using the SHELXTL-PLUS suite of programs.40 Details of the structure solution and final refinements for 1, 2, and 3 are given in Table 2.
Table 2:  Crystal Data and Structure Refinement Parameters for 1, {2}, 2, {2·H2O}, and 3, {2}a
structure parameter 1 2 3&&
empirical formula&&C38H24N2O10Co2&&C48H34N4O11Ni2&&C38H24N2O10Zn2&&
formula weight&&786.46&&960.2&&799.335&&
crystal system&&monoclinic&&triclinic&&triclinic&&
space group&&C2/c (no.15)&&P1̄ (no.2)&&P1̄ (no.2)&&
a (&A)&&22.493(3)&&11.269(4)&&11.292(3)&&
b (&A)&&13.6914(19)&&11.270(4)&&12.339(3)&&
c (&A)&&12.7681(18)&&20.711(7)&&14.413(3)&&
α (deg)&&90.0&&77.608(5)&&94.857(4)&&
β (deg)&&115.723(3)&&77.608(5)&&109.711(4)&&
γ (deg)&&90.0&&64.727(4)&&108.016(4)&&
volume (&A3)&&)&&)&&)&&
Z&&4&&2&&2&&
T (K)&&293(2)&&293(2)&&293(2)&&
ρcalc (g cm-3)&&1.475&&1.383&&1.511&&
μ (mm-1)&&0.998&&0.882&&1.427&&
θ range (deg)&&1.80 to&#&&1.02 to&#&&1.78 to&#&&
λ (Mo Kα) (&A)&&0.773&&0.71073&&
R indexes &&R1 =, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =&&
R (all data)&&R1 =�, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =
a R1 = Σ ||F0| − |Fc||/Σ |F0|; wR2 = {Σ /Σ }1/2; w = 1/; P = /3, where a = 0.0564 and b =0.000 for 1, a = 0.0638 and b = 0.7061 for 2, and a =0.0563 and b = 0.0837 for 3.
Photocatalytic Experiments. The photochemical reactor employed in this study was comprised of a jacketed quartz tube of 3.4 cm inner diameter (i.d.), 4 cm outer diameter (o.d.), and 21 cm length and an outer Pyrex glass reactor of 5.7 cm i.d. and 16 cm length. A high-pressure mercury vapor lamp (HPML) of 125 W (Philips, India) was placed inside the jacketed quartz tube after removal of the outer shell. The ballast and capacitor were connected in a series with the lamp to avoid fluctuations in input supply. Water was circulated through the annulus of the quartz tube to avoid heating of the solution due to dissipative loss of UV energy. The solution was taken in the outer reactor and continuously stirred to ensure that the suspension of the catalyst was uniform. The lamp radiated predominantly at 365 nm corresponding to an energy of 3.4 eV, and the photon flux is 5.8 × 10-6 moles of photons per second. Further details of the experimental setup can be found elsewhere.34 For the degradation studies, the dyes were dissolved in double distilled Millipore filtered water. The effect of the initial concentration of the dyes and the effect of catalyst loading on the reaction rates were investigated. The reactions were carried out at 40 °C, which was maintained by circulating water in the annulus of the jacketed quartz reactor. Samples were collected at regular intervals, filtered through Millipore membrane filters, and centrifuged to remove the catalyst particles prior to analysis, as described below. Samples were analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer UV−vis spectrophotometer (model Lambda 32). The calibration for OG, RhB, RBBR, and MB was based on the Beer−Lambert law at its maximum absorption wavelengths, λmax, of 481, 554, 590, and 661 nm, respectively. Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableResults and Discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Structure of 1, { 2}. The asymmetric unit of 1 consists of 26 non-hydrogen atoms, of which one cobalt atom is crystallographically independent. The Co2+ ions have a distorted trigonal biprismatic geometry formed by four carboxylate oxygen atoms and a nitrogen atom of the 4,4‘-bipyridine. The Co−O bond distances have an average value of 2.024 &A, and the Co−N distance has a value of 2.103(3) &A. The O/N−Co−O/N bond angles are in the range 85.8 (1)&#(1)°. There is only one OBA anion present in the structure, and the carboxylates have bis-bidentate connectivity with the Co2+ cations forming a eight-membered ring. The bond distances and angles associated with the OBA anions are in the ranges expected for this type of bonding. The selected bond distances 1 are listed in Table 3. The connectivity between Co2+, OBA anions, and 4,4‘-bpy gives rise to a 3D structure. The complex structure of 1 can be understood in terms of simpler building units. Thus, the Co2+ ions are linked to the carboxylate units giving rise to an eight-membered ring, which are further connected through their corners forming a 1D chain structure. The chain structure resembles the commonly observed corner-shared 1D phosphate structure.41
Table 3:  Selected Bond Distances in 1, {2}
bond distance, &A bond distance, &A&&
Co(1)−O(1)&&2.012(3)&&Co(1)−O(4)&&1.973(3)&&
Co(1)−O(2)&&2.085(3)&&Co(1)−N(1)&&2.103(3)&&
Co(1)−O(3)&&2.024(3)& && &
The connectivity between the corner-shared eight-membered ring chains and the OBA anions forms a layer (Figure 1a), which is cross-linked by the 4,4‘-bpy molecules giving rise to the 3D structure. The 4, 4‘-bpy molecules have both in-plane and out-of-plane connectivity. Viewing down the c axis, the linkages between the Co2+ ions and the OBA anions are cross-linked by the 4,4‘-bpy molecules (Figure 1b). The entire structure appears to have an efficient packing for optimum π···π interactions between the OBA anions and 4,4‘-bpy molecules.
Figure 1 (a) Connectivity between the Co2+ and OBA anions. (b) Connectivity along the c axis.
Structure of 2, { 2·H2O}. The asymmetric unit of 2 consists of 66 non-hydrogen atoms, of which two nickel atoms are crystallographically independent. Both the Ni2+ ions have distorted octahedral coordination formed by four carboxylate oxygen atoms and two nitrogen atoms of the 4,4‘-bipyridine ligand. The Ni−O distances are in the range 2.009(3)&#(3) &A (av. Ni−O = 2.072), and the Ni−N distances have an average value of 2.094 &A. The O/N−Ni(1)−O/N bond angles are in the range 61.94(12)&#(14)°. There are two OBA anions present in the structure, and the carboxylates bond with the Ni2+ ions to form eight-membered rings. The bond distances and angles associated with the OBA anions are in the ranges expected for this type of bonding. The selected bond distances for 2 are listed in Table 4.
Table 4:  Selected Bond Distances in 2, {2·H2O}
bond distance, &A bond distance, &A&&
Ni(1)−O(1)&&2.114(3)&&Ni(2)−O(5)a&&2.009(3)&&
Ni(1)−O(2)&&2.127(3)&&Ni(2)−O6)b&&2.036(3)&&
Ni(1)−O(3)&&2.009(3)&&Ni(2)−O(7)&&2.129(3)&&
Ni(1)−O(4)&&2.037(3)&&Ni(2)−O(8)&&2.116(3)&&
Ni(1)−N(1)&&2.099(3)&&Ni(2)−N(4)&&2.100(3)&&
Ni(1)−N(2)&&2.088(3)&&Ni(2)−N(21)&&2.087(3)
a Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  x + 2, y − 2, z.b Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1.
The 3D structure of 2 is built-up from the connectivity involving Ni2+, OBA anions, and 4,4-bpy ligands. As in 1, the connectivity between the Ni2+ cations and OBA anions gives rise to eight-membered rings. This is the simplest building unit in 2. The overall structure of 2, though complex, can be understood by considering smaller fragments and taking connectivity into consideration. Thus, the connectivity between the Ni2+ ions and OBA anions forms a 2D porous grid in the (110) plane (Figure 2a), which is cross-linked by the 4,4‘-bpy ligands forming the 3D structure (Figure 2b).
Figure 2 (a) Connectivity between Ni2+ ions and OBA anions forming a two-dimensional grid in the (110) plane. (b) Three-dimensional structure.
Structure of 3, { 2}. The asymmetric unit of 3 consists of 52 non-hydrogen atoms, of which two zinc atoms are crystallographically independent. While the Zn(1) has a distorted trigonal biprismatic geometry formed by three carboxylate oxygen atoms and two nitrogen atom of the 4,4‘-bipyridine, Zn(2) has a distorted tetrahedral geometry connected by four carboxylate oxygen atoms. The Zn−O distances are in the range 1.932(2)&#(2) &A (av Zn(1)−O = 2.0774 and Zn(2)−O = 1.945 &A), and Zn−N distances have an average value of 2.109 &A. The O/N−Zn(1)−O/N bond angles are in the range 87.13(8)&#(9)°, and the distorted tetrahedral O−Zn(2)−O bond angles have the average value of 109.3°. There are two OBA anions present in the structure, and the carboxylates bond with the Zn2+ ions to form two types of eight-membered rings. The bond distances and angles associated with the OBA anions are in the ranges expected for this type of bonding. The selected bond distances for 3 are listed in Table 5.
Table 5:  Selected Bond Distances in 3, {2}
bond distance, &A bond distance, &A&&
Zn(1)−O(1)&&2.093(2)&&Zn(1)−N(1)&&2.119(2)&&
Zn(1)−O(2)&&2.0891(19)&&Zn(1)−N(2)&&2.098(2)&&
Zn(1)−O(3)&&2.0501(19)&&Zn(2)−O(4)b&&1.958(2)&&
Zn(2)−O(6)a&&1.932(2)&&O(4)−Zn(2)b&&1.958(2)&&
Zn(2)−O(7)&&1.939(2)&&O(6)−Zn(2)d&&1.932(2)&&
Zn(2)−O(5)&&1.952(2)& && &
a Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  x, y, z − 1.b Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  −x, −y + 2, −z + 1.c Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  −x, −y + 1, −z.d Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  x, y, z + 1.
The connectivity in 3, between Zn2+, OBA anions, and 4,4‘-bpy, gives rise to a 3D structure. There are two types of OBA anions:  acid-1 is connected to two Zn(1) atoms and one Zn(2) atom and acid-2 is connected to three Zn(2) atoms and one Zn(1) atom, through the carboxylate oxygen atoms. This gives rise to one of the carboxylate oxygen atoms of acid-2 being free. The Zn2+ ions are linked to the carboxylate units giving rise to two different eight-membered rings, which are further connected by the OBA anions giving rise to a layerlike structure in the bc plane (Figure 3a). Unlike 1, the eight-membered rings are not connected together in 3. The layers are further connected by both the OBA anions and the 4,4‘-bpy ligands. The arrangement of the structure in the ac plane is shown in Figure 3b. As can be noted, the Zn(1) atoms are connected by two sets of 4,4‘-bpy ligands forming a 1D structure, which are connected by the OBA ligands with the Zn(2) eight-membered rings.
Figure 3 (a) Layer structure formed by the connectivity between Zn2+ and OBA. (b) Three-dimensional structure formed by the connectivity involving the 4,4‘-bpy units.
Three new compounds, 1, 2, and 3, have been prepared, which have 3D connectivity resulting from the expected building units of OBA anions, 4,4‘-bpy ligands, and the central M2+ ion. There are, however, subtle differences in the coordination geometry around the central M2+ ions. In 1, the Co2+ ions have distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry (four oxygens and a nitrogen), in 2, the Ni2+ ions have octahedral geometry (four oxygens and two nitrogens), and the Zn2+ ions have both the tetrahedral (four oxygens) and the trigonal bipyramidal (three oxygens and two nitrogens) geometries in 3. The formation of tetrahedral Zn is not common in MOF compounds. In many transition metal benzenecarboxylates, the octahedral coordination is most often encountered. The formation of five-coordinated Co2+ and Zn2+ ions, in 1 and 3, is probably due to the differences in the reaction conditions.2,4,5 The OBA anion can be considered similar to the water molecule. The angle between H−O−H is 104.5°, and the free acid has an angle of 122.5° suspended between the two benzene rings. The large angles in the free OBA acid might be due to hydrogen bond interactions. In compounds 1−3, the angles between the OBA anions with respect to the central oxygen atom are 118.1° (1), 117.6 and 117.3° (2), and 115.4 and 118.5° (3). The observed angles in the compounds are similar to the angles observed in diphenyl ether and other related compounds. The role of π···π interactions in the stability of supramolecularly engineered crystal structures have been well established.42,43 In recent years, in the MOFs formed using benzenecarboxylates, the role of π···π interactions has been a topic of much interest. In the present compounds, we find two types of π···π interactions:  one homo interaction involving similar species, for example, the two OBA anions or two 4,4‘-bpy ligands, and a hetero interaction involving the OBA anions and 4,4‘-bipyridine ligand. In 1, we find only the hetero interaction, and in 2, we find only the homo interaction, and both homo and hetero interactions have been observed in 3. The role of π···π interactions for the stability of organic compounds has been discussed in the literature with particular emphasis on the centroid−centroid distances (d) and the angles (θ) suspended between the benzene rings.42,43 A correlation between the two (d and θ) has been discussed in terms of a phase diagram with the distances and angles having a unique relationship. From this, the following interactions appear to be important for different values of the centroid−centroid distance (d) and angles (θ):  (i) d = 0−3 &A and θ = 50−90°, (ii) d = 3−7 &A and θ = 0−50°, (iii) d = 4&# &A and θ = 140&#°, and (iv) d = 6−7 &A and θ = 0&#°. The centroid−centroid distance (d) and the interplanar angles (θ) between the ligands in all the compounds are shown in Figure 4, which clearly indicates favorable π···π interactions in all the compounds. For 1, we find interactions between OBA and 4,4-bpy with d = 3.9 &A and θ = 12°, in 2, the two 4.4‘-bpy ligands have d = 4.5 &A and θ = 25.5°, which are less favorable, and in 3, we find two distances and angles due to the positioning of the OBA anions and 4,4‘-bpy. Thus, d = 3.8 and 4 &A with θ = 15 and 19° have been observed (Figure 4c). In addition, homo interactions between 4,4‘-bpy and the OBA anions have also been encountered in 3 (parts d and e of Figure 4). The distances and angles between the two OBA anions and the 4, 4‘-bpy ligands in 3 are as follows:  for OBA, d = 3.88 &A and θ = 4° and for 4,4‘-bpy, d = 4.13 &A and θ = 1.7°.
Figure 4 Possible π···π interactions between the various participating ligands:  (a) 1, (b) 2, and (c)−(e) 3.
To understand the nature and role of the π···π interactions, we have performed preliminary calculations using the AM1 parametrized Hamiltonian available in the Gaussian set of codes.44,45 Using the crystal structure geometry, we have made an evaluation of the strength of the π···π interactions in 1 and 2 based on single-point energy calculation without the symmetry constraints. The calculated π···π interaction energies between 4,4‘-bpy and OBA were found to be 4.3 kcal/mol and 4.8 kcal/mol, respectively, for 1 and 3. The π···π interaction energy between the two 4, 4‘-bpy compounds was found to be 1.83 kcal/mol in 2. The π···π interaction energies, in 3, between the two 4,4‘-bpy and the two OBA anions were found to be 4.12 and 1.5 kcal/mol. The calculated energies suggest that they are comparable to the energies encountered in systems involving weak hydrogen bonds (3−6 kcal/mol).46 It is interesting to note that, in 1 and 2, only one type of π···π interaction (between OBA&#‘-bpy) and (between two 4,4‘-bpy) has been observed. In the case of 3, however, three distinct types have been encountered (OBA&#‘-bpy, OBA−OBA, and 4,4‘-bpy&#‘-bpy). It is becoming clear that the π···π interactions appear to play an important role, as the weak hydrogen bonds in some of the supramolecularly arranged structures and in the structural arrangement and the stability of MOF compounds. The geometry of 4,4‘-bipyridine in the three compounds is different with varying degrees of twist angles between the two pyridine rings. The twist angles are 0.23°, 25.60°, and 4.26°, respectively, for 1, 2, and 3. The calculated twist angle between the two pyridine rings in 4,4‘-bpy, in the gas phase, is 35.56°. This shows the subtle influence affected by the participating OBA ligands and the M2+ ions. The diffuse reflectance UV−vis spectra at room temperature were recorded for the sodium salt of OBA and for the as-synthesized coordination polymers (Figure S6). In all cases, the main absorption bands are at 311, 294, 290, and 275 nm, for 1, 2, 3, and Na−OBA, respectively. The bands can be assigned to ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT). As can be noted, the absorption maximum of the LMCT band of the Na−OBA is blue shifted compared with the LMCT band of the three compounds. This may be due to the fact that the Na+1 ion is more electropositive than the Zn2+, Ni2+, and Co2+ ions and would require more energy for the transfer of the charge from the ligand to the metal. It is well established that the polarizability of the four ions are in the order Co2+ > Ni2+ > Zn2+ > Na+1, and hence, the energy required for the LMCT would be in the reverse order.47 In the case of 1, we also observe two clear additional peaks at 480 and 575 nm and a broad one at a higher wavelength. The peaks at 480 and 575 nm, probably, originate from the d−d transition of the d7 (Co2+) ion. The Co2+ ions in 1 are in a trigonal bipyramidal environment, and the peaks at 480 and 575 nm can be assigned to 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘ ‘(P) and 4A‘2(F) → 4A‘2(P), and the broad peak at higher wavelength could be due to 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘(F) and 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘ ‘(F) transitions.48 Similarly, the other peaks in 2 may also originate from the d−d transition of the d8(Ni2+) ion. Ni2+ ions are in an octahedral environment so the peaks at 361 and 656 nm can be assigned to 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(P) and 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(F), respectively.48 To obtain the precise values of band gap from the absorption edges, the point of inflection determined from the minimum in the first derivative of the absorption spectrum was used. The values of the band gap, thus obtained corresponding to the LMCT transitions from the UV−vis spectra, are 3.11, 3.89, and 4.02 eV for 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Room-temperature solid-state photoluminescence studies were carried out on powdered samples (Perkin-Elmer, U.K.) (Figure S7). Photoluminescence studies of the MOF compounds here have been investigated in great detail during the past few years.49-52 In our present study, we found that all three MOF compounds 1, 2, and 3 and Na−OBA exhibit photoluminescence. To understand the nature of the emission bands, we have confirmed that both free 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) and 4,4‘-bipyridine ligands do not emit any luminescence in the range 400&# nm.24 Compound 1 exhibits a broad emission band at 430 nm and two more peaks at 483 nm and at 525 nm, when excited at 235 nm. The emission peak at 430 nm for 1 may be due to the ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) and the peaks at 483 nm and at 525 nm can be assigned to the 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘ ‘(P) and 4A‘2(F) → 4A‘2(P) transitions coming from the d−d transition of the d7(Co2+) system.48 Compound 2exhibits a broad emission peak at 443 nm and two more peaks at 483 nm and at 525 nm, when excited at 235 nm. The emission peak at 443 nm may be due to the LMCT band and the peaks at 483 nm and at 524 nm can be assigned to the 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(P) and 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(F) transitions coming from the d−d transition of the d8(Ni2+) system.48 Compound 3, on the other hand, exhibits a single broad emission band at 436 nm, when excited at 235 nm. This peak can be assigned to the LMCT band. The single peak for compound 3 also confirms that the two low intensity peaks observed for compounds 1 and 2 are due to the d−d transitions not from the ligands. The Na−OBA also exhibits one broad emission band at 410 nm, when excited at 235 nm, which is due to the LMCT. The different positioning of the main emission peaks in 1−3 indicates that the band is due to the LMCT and not from the intraligand fluorescence. Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements for 1 and 2 have been performed on powder samples using a SQUID magnetometer (Figure 5). In the case of Co2+ and Ni2+ compounds, the first-order spin−orbital interactions and the orbital contribution have a significant contribution to the exchange magnetic coupling parameter due to the orbitally degenerate electronic ground state of Co2+ and Ni2+.53 These contributions are completely suppressed for octahedral geometry around Ni2+, but for Co2+ in the trigonal bipyramidal geometry, the orbital contribution has significant input to the magnetic moment at room temperature. The observed effective magnetic moment of compound 1 at room temperature (300 K) is 4.44 μB, which corresponds to the value expected for noninteracting paramagnetic Co2+ ions with significant orbital contribution, as the spin-only moment of the Co2+ ion is 3.87 μB. A plot of 1/χM vs T for 1 was found to be liner in the range 50&# K with a Weiss temperature (θP) of −11 K and a Curie constant (C) of 2.5 emu/mol. The negative Weiss temperature (θP) indicates weak antiferromagnetic interactions in 1.54,55 The effective magnetic moment of 2 at room temperature (300 K) is 2.97 μB which corresponds to the value expected for noninteracting paramagnetic Ni2+ ions, a value that is very close to the Ni2+ spin-only moment of 2.83 μB. A plot of 1/χM vs T for 2 was found to be linear in the range 50&# K with a Weiss temperature (θP) of −15 K and a Curie constant (C) of 1.13 emu/mol. The negative θP values, again, indicate the presence of weak antiferromagnetic interactions in 2.54,55
Figure 5 Temperature variation of the molar magnetic susceptibility (χM) for 1 (a) and for 2 (b). The inset shows the corresponding 1/χM vs T plots.
Photocatalytic Investigations. Photocatalytic degradation of four commonly used dyes, orange G (OG), rhodamine B (RhB), Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR), and methylene blue (MB), was investigated. These four dyes were selected as model dye pollutants in aqueous media to demonstrate the efficacies of the photocatalytic behavior of the three polymers. The photocatalytic performance of the three polymers was estimated from the variation of the color in the reaction system by monitoring the absorbance (at λ = 482, 554, 590, and 661 nm) characteristic of the targets OG, RhB, RBBR, and MB which directly relate to the structural changes of their chromophore. For comparison, the photocatalytic performance of commercial TiO2 (Degussa P-25) was also assessed under the same experimental conditions. Control experiments without catalyst, UV, and both were also carried out:  while no degradation was observed with catalyst only in the absence of UV, degradation was observed in the absence of catalyst in the presence of UV. The degradation profiles of all the four dyes with an initial concentration of 100 ppm by using three compounds, TiO2 (Degussa P-25) and dyes with out catalysts are shown in Figure 6 where the catalysts concentration are constant (2 kg/m3) for each case.
Figure 6 Degradation profiles of all four dyes with an initial concentration of 100 ppm without catalyst (a), with Degussa P-25 (b), with compound 1 (c), with compound 2 (d), and with compound 3 (e).
The degradation of four different dyes was investigated with a loading of 2 kg/m3. To quantify the reactions, the kinetics was determined by the Langmuir−Hinshelwood (L−H) kinetic. This can be written as r0 = k0C0/(1 + K0C0), where r0 is the initial rate, C0 is the initial concentration of the dyes, k0 is the kinetic rate constant, and parameter K0 represents the equivalent adsorption coefficient. The plots of the reciprocal initial degradation rate (1/ro) with the reciprocal of the initial dye concentration (1/C0) by using 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figure 7. The values of the parameters, k0 and K0, for the photocatalytic degradation of the dyes, obtained from the slope and the intercept of the linear plot, are shown in Table 6.
Figure 7 Variation of the initial photodegradation rate with the initial concentration of the four dyes for (a) 3, (b) 2, and (c) 1. Note that in all the cases a linear correlation with a regression coefficient >0.99 has been observed.
Table 6:  Kinetic Parameters for the Degradation of Dyes Using Three Compounds
compound dye k0 (min-1) K0 (ppm-1)&&
1&&OG&&0.031&&0.0022&&
1&&RhB&&0.013&&0.0035&&
1&&RBBR&&0.033&&0.0007&&
1&&MB&&0.032&&0.0064&&
2&&OG&&0.029&&0.0049&&
2&&RhB&&0.008&&0.0023&&
2&&RBBR&&0.029&&0.0015&&
2&&MB&&0.027&&0.0027&&
3&&OG&&0.02&&0.0029&&
3&&RhB&&0.007&&0.002&&
3&&RBBR&&0.028&&0.0069&&
3&&MB&&0.023&&0.0029
As the parameter, K0, represents the adsorption equilibrium coefficient, the low value of K0 can be attributed to negligible adsorption. This is also confirmed by powder XRD of the catalyst after the photocatalytic degradation experiments, which clearly indicated that the structure remained the same and no adsorption was observed. For the degradation of all four dyes, the order of degradation is 1 > 2 > 3. The band gaps of 1, 2, and 3 follow the order 1 < 2 < 3; the degradation of all dyes follow the reverse order. The photocatalytic activity of the present compounds can be explained based on some of the earlier observations. Several Co complexes with chelating nitrogen ligands catalyze oxidation reactions, for example, 2+ activates O2 and oxidizes N-methyl-anilines, benzyl alcohols, and aldehydes.56 Polydentate CoII complexes with ligands capable of intercalation into DNA strands are capable of inducing DNA cleavage under photochemical conditions.57 The activation of O2 in the above systems occurs through the ligand-to-metal charge transfer. The oxidations of organic compounds by using other transition metal compounds with chelating ligand occur through the same principle in the presence of light. In the present compounds, we have a similar situation as metal exists in M+2 states. From our UV−vis spectroscopic study, we clearly see two types of transition:  the most intense peak originates due to the LMCT and the other peaks belong to the d−d spin allowed transition. Although the photocatalytic experiments on 1, 2, and 3 were carried out in heterogeneous conditions, it is believed that the photocatalytically active metal center would behave in a way similar to that in solution. Of the two types of electronic states observed in the compounds, the LMCT effect, which is in the UV region, probably is responsible for the photocatalytic activity.53 To understand the photocatalytic degradation of the organic dyes, we employ a simple approach based upon highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) considerations. Accordingly, the HOMO and LUMO of the charge transfer state, in the absence of the UV light, would have two electrons in the HOMO and the LUMO would be vacant. In the presence of UV light, there is an electron transfer from the HOMO to LUMO. The electron of the excited state in the LUMO is usually very easily lost, while the HOMO strongly demands one electron to return to its stable state. Generally, the excited M+2 center decays to its ground state quickly. However, if some molecules are within a reasonable range and have an appropriate orientation, for example, RhB in this case, transitional active complexes can be formed. Thus, one α-hydrogen atom of the methylene group bonded to the electron-withdrawing nitrogen atom of RhB, which will give up its electron and leave as H+ later, is abstracted by metal species, and this results in the cleavage of the C−N bond and stepwise N-deethylation of RhB. Since the HOMO is then reoccupied, the excited electron must remain in the LUMO until it is captured by electronegative substances such as molecular oxygen in solution, which would transform into highly active peroxide anion and subsequently accomplish further oxidation and total degradation of RhB. A similar mechanism has been proposed recently for the degradation of organic dyes in the presence of metal carboxylates.37 Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableConclusions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The synthesis and structure of three new coordination polymers has been accomplished by employing hydrothermal methods. The samples have been characterized using a variety of techniques such as powder XRD, single-crystal XRD, IR, UV−vis, photoluminescence, magnetic, and photocatalytic studies. All the compounds appear to be active for the photocatalytic decomposition of common organic dyes (OG, RhB, RBBR, and MB) used in textile industries, with activities better than Degussa P-25 TiO2 catalysts. A possible mechanism, through an activated complex involving M+2, has been proposed. This study clearly reveals that it is profitable to investigate metal carboxylates for photocatalytic activity. Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableAcknowledgment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.N. thanks the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, for the award of a research grant, and P.M. thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, for the award of a research fellowship.
Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableSupporting Information Available
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powder X-ray patterns of (a) simulated and (b) experimental of 1 (Figure S1); powder X-ray patterns of (a) simulated and (b) experimental of 2 (Figure S2); powder X-ray patterns of (a) simulated and (b) experimental of 3 (Figure S3); TGA studies of the three compounds (Figure S4); IR spectra of the three compounds (Figure S5); UV−vis spectra of the three compounds and Na salt of OBA (Figure S6); Photoluminescence spectra of the three compounds and Na salt of OBA (Figure S7); Bond angles of the three compounds (Table S1−S3). CCDC:&#&# contain(s) the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper (Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. This article references 57 other publications.
(1) Ocwig, N. W.; Friedrichs, O.-D.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 6.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(2) Ferey, G. Nat. Mater. 7.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(3) Moulton, B.; Zawarotko, M. J. Chem. Rev. , 1629.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(4) Bradshaw, D.; Claridge, J. B.; Cussen, E. J.; Prior, T. J.; Rosseinksy, M. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 3.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(5) Rao, C. N. R.; Natarajan, S.; Vaidhyanathan, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 66.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(6) Seo, J. S.; Whang, D.; Lee, H.; Jun, S. I.; Oh, J.; Jeon, Y. J.; Kim, K. Nature , 982.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(7) Rosi, N. L.; Eukert, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Vodak, D. T.; Kim, J.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Science , 1127.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(8) Barthelet, K.; Marrot, J.; Ferey, G.; Riou, D. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(9) Zhao, X.; Xiao, B.; Fletcher, A. J.; Thomas, K. M.; Bradshaw, D.; Rosseinsky, M. J. Science , 1012.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Dybtsev, D. N.; Chun, H.; Kim, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 33.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(11) Biradha, K.; Fujita, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 92.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(12) Serre, C.; Ferey, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 9574.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(13) Cutland, A. D.; Halfen, J. A.; Kampf, J. W.; Pecoraro, V. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 6211.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(14) Pan, L.; Zheng, N. W.; Wu, Y. G.; Han, S.; Yang, R. Y.; Huang, X. Y. Inorg. Chem. 8.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(15) Li, L. C.; Liao, D. Z.; Jiang, Z. H.; Yan, S. P. Inorg. Chem. 1.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(16) Liu, Y.; Kravtsov, V.; Walsh, R.; Poddar, P.; Srikanth, H.; Eddaoudi, M. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(17) Eubank, J. F.; Walsh, R. D.; Eddaoudi, M. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(18) Min, D.; Yoon, S. S.; Lee, S. W. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 3.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(19) Guo, X.; Zhu, G.; Fang, Q.; Xue, M.; Tian, G.; Sun, J.; Li, X.; Qiu, S. Inorg. Chem. 50.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Shiu, K. B.; Lee, H. C.; Lee, G. H.; Ko, B. T.; Wang, Y.; Lin, C. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 99.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(21) Thirumurugan, A.; Natarajan, S. Dalton Trans. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(22) Thirumurugan, A.; Pati, S. K.; Green, M. A.; Natarajan, S. J. Mater. Chem. 37.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(23) Kondo, M.; Irie, Y.; Shimizu, Y.; Miyazawa, M.; Kawaguchi, H.; Nakamura, A.; Naito, T.; Maeda, K.; Uchida, F. Inorg. Chem. 39.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(24) Tao, J.; Shi, J. X.; Tong, M. L.; Zhang, X. X.; Chen, X. M. Inorg. Chem. 28.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(25) Han, Z. B.; Cheng, X. N.; Chen, X. M. Cryst. Growth Des. 5.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(26) Hoffmann, M. R.; Martin, S. T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D. W. Chem. Rev. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(27) Meunier, B. Science , 270.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(28) Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Nature , 37.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(29) Khaselev, O.; Turner, J. A. Science , 425.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Zou, Z.; Ye, J.; Sayama, K.; Arakawa, H. Nature , 625.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(31) Papaconstantinou, E. Chem. Soc. Rev. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(32) Yoshimura, J.; Ebina, Y.; Kondo, J.; Domen, K.; Tanaka, A. J. Phys. Chem. 70.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(33) Saupe, G. B.; Mallouk, T. E.; Kim, W.; Schmehl, R. H. J. Phys. Chem. B , 2508.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(34) Sivalingam, G.; Nagaveni, K.; Hegde, M. S.; Madras, G. Appl. Catal., B .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(35) Muktha, B.; Priya, M. H.; Madras, G.; Guru Row, T. N. J. Phys. Chem. B , 11442.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(36) Yu, Z. T.; Liao, Z. L.; Jiang, Y. S.; Li, G. H.; Li, G. D.; Chen, J. S. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(37) Yu, Z. T.; Liao, Z. L.; Jiang, Y. S.; Li, G. H.; Chen, J. S. Chem.−Eur. J. 42.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(38) Mahata, P.; Sankar, G.; Madras, G.; Natarajan, S. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(39) Sheldrich, G. M. SADABS Siemens Area Detector Absorption Correction P University of G&ttingen:  G&ttingen, Germany, 1994.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL-PLUS program for Crystal Structure Solution and R University of G&ttingen:  G&ttingen, Germany, 1997.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(41) Rao, C. N. R.; Natarajan, S.; Neeraj, S.; Choudhury, A.; Ayi, A. A. Acc. Chem. Res. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(42) Hunter, C. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , ;5534.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(43) Hunter, C. A.; Singh, J.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Mol. Biol. , 837&#.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(44) Gaussian 03, revision B.05; Gaussian Inc.:  Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(45) Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 3902.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(46) Scheiner, S. Hydrogen Bonding:  A Theoretical P Oxford University Press:  New York, 1997.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(47) Huheey, J.; Keiter, E. A.; Keiter, R. L. Inorganic Chemistry:  Principles of structure and reactivity, 4 Pearson Education:  New York, 2000.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(48) Lever, A. B. P. Inorganic Electronic S Elsevier:  New York, 1968.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(49) He, J.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Xu, R. Inorg. Chem. 79.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Tong, M. L.; S, Hu.; Kitwaga, S.; Ng, S. W. Inorg. Chem. 7.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(51) Chen, Y. B.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, J. K.; Kang, Y.; Li, Z. J.; Yao, Y. G. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 39.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(52) Dai, J. C.; Wu, X. T.; Fu, Z. Y.; Hu, S. M.; Du, W. X.; Cui, C. P. Chem. Commun. 2002, 12.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(53) Goodenough, J. B. Magnetism a Interscience Publishers:  New York, 1966.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(54) Tynan, E.; Jensen, P.; Kelly, N. R.; Kruger, P. E.; Lees, A. C.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K. S. Dalton Trans. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(55) Yuan, Y. P.; Wang, R. Y.; Kong, D. Y.; Mao, J. G.; Clearfield, A. J. Solid State Chem. , 2030.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(56) Cotton, F. A.; Wilkinson, G.; Murillo, C. A.; Bachmann, M. Advanced Inorganic C John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:  New York, 1999.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(57) Bhattacharya, S.; Mandal, S. S. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference. : Originally posted by digghost at
AbstractThree novel metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) 2, 1, 2·H2O, 2, and 2, 3, with three-dimensional structures have been synthesized and characterized. The structures of the three compounds appear&&... 三楼真狠，膜拜中，你上传到网盘给他个网址就行了吧~ : Originally posted by pypypy-317 at
怎么给你啊？把你的邮箱告诉我吧，我已经把文献下好了。 我的邮箱，，谢谢啦！ : Originally posted by meizi0314 at
我的邮箱，，谢谢啦！... 因为我不是常在线，刚看到你的消息，文献已经给你发过过去了，请注意查收。}
> 请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?
请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?
转载 编辑：李强
为了帮助网友解决“请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?”相关的问题，中国学网通过互联网对“请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?”相关的解决方案进行了整理,用户详细问题包括:RT,我想知道:请问电脑磁盘空间1GB等于多少MB?，具体解决方案如下：解决方案1：1kb=1024b。所以电脑配件说是500。 1MB=1024KB。1b=8bit，是1G=1000MB。 但是电脑磁盘计算的话计算的方式是 1G=1024MB解决方案2：1MB=1024KB：1TB=1024MB,1KB=1024B电脑存储量的换算都是1024，如解决方案3：1GB = 1024 MB解决方案4：1G=1024MB解决方案5：1G=1024MB通过对数据库的索引,我们还为您准备了：答：1G=24kb 说是这样 可有时候并不是这样的 根据实际情况===========================================问：问题是 电脑硬盘分配的磁盘容量 1：9.76GB等于多少MB 等于多少KB？ 2：4...答：1.=9994.24MB=KB 2.=4894.2MB=KB 3.=44544MB=KB===========================================问：我最近在下载Q，QQ下载说磁盘空间不足，本人还是小孩，对电脑不了解，可...答：1GB等于1024M 这时候显示磁盘不足并不是空间的问题===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：1GB=1024MB（理论上） 计算机存储信息的大小，最基本的单位是字节，一个汉字由两个字节组成，字母和数字由一个字节组成。 容量的单位从小到大依次是：字节（B）、KB、MB、GB、TB。它们之间的关系是。 1TB=1024GB 1GB=1024MB 1MB=1024KB 1KB=1024...===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：1024MB===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：PC电脑 : 容量 硬盘\内存是个人电脑中存储数据的重要部件，其容量就决定着个人电脑的数据存储量大小的能力，这也就是用户购买硬盘所首先要注意的参数之一。 硬盘的容量是以MB（兆）和GB（千兆）为单位的，早期的硬盘容量低下，大多以MB（兆）为...===========================================问：电脑里的1GB等于多少MB?1MB等于多少字节呀? 还有TB GB MB KB着4个单位的...答：兄弟啊，C盘是系统盘！ 系统运行全靠C盘的 一般里边不建议放除了运行系统需要以外的所有东西的 会退累电脑的运行速度的！ C盘一般要留10G的容量至少吧 基本上有8G左右要空着的 方便平时数据转移和提高电脑的运行速度 你留100MB空间够干什么的啊 ...===========================================问：有人知道的回答下答：1GB=1024MB 14GB=14*MB 应该是这个===========================================商家弄的硬盘是 1000MB 照书上的是1024===========================================最低配置:CPU PIII-500MHz 以上 内存 128M以上 2.4G硬盘空间 支持DirectX 7.0以上及DirectSound声卡 鼠标、键盘 推荐配置:64K/bps以上的上网环境 CPU 1G Hz以...===========================================经过几个小时的使用,基本上记数器已经可以对你的使用情况做出一个完整的评估。 5.... GB,那么为了节省硬盘空间,完全可以把分页文件最大值缩小为512MB大小。而对于最小...===========================================MB=1024KB 1GB=1024MB 顺便告诉你:GB后面还有 1TB=1024GB 1PB=1024TB 1EB=1024PB 1ZB=1024EB 1YB=1024ZB 所谓"b"(bit),是一个2进制数,是电脑...=========================================== 但是计算计算机硬件储存量大小时,为了计算方便一般就按照1GB=1000MB 1MB=100... 250GB=KB 如果来计算硬盘空间大小的话4GB=GB=250000...===========================================数量 单价 CPU AMD 速龙II X4 651/盒装 ￥ 460 主板* 双敏UA75GT-S全固态EVO版 ... 4G ￥ 140 硬盘 希捷Barracuda G单碟 ￥ 410 显卡 蓝宝HD6670 1GB G...===========================================会调用512M的硬盘空间做虚拟内存.肯定比物理内存慢,所以读盘会读很久很久=========================================== 512*===========================================扫雷和纸牌这种大型游戏不适合你这种低配置电脑玩,会很卡===========================================我的电脑经常被提醒c盘磁盘空间不够,要怎样做才能避免呢?我的电脑是1GB的。谢谢了。 童揪沸恼卧竟片降摇任===========================================
本文欢迎转载，转载请注明：转载自中国学网： []
用户还关注
可能有帮助100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB-中国学网-中国IT综合门户网站
> 100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB
100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB
转载 编辑：李强
为了帮助网友解决“100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=”相关的问题，中国学网通过互联网对“100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=”相关的解决方案进行了整理,用户详细问题包括:RT,我想知道:100兆网速等于多少MB，100M网速=多少MB，具体解决方案如下：解决方案1：100M网速的话，理论上市100 / 8 = 12.5M每秒的速度解决方案2：是不是就是10MB那样，为什么要除以8呢，100M=12.5MB解决方案3：100M其实是100M Byte，我们所说的网速是指的Bit而1Bit = 8 Byte，所以100M其实是12.5M的网速解决方案4：我测试速度，你说的12.5M是不是就是测试网速12.5MB解决方案5：是啊！360测速的话，应该是显示10M以上专线！解决方案6：谢谢!解决方案7：1兆=1024kb=1mb,由此可知100兆网速=100mb解决方案8：100Mbps=12.5M/s ~解决方案9：是不是就是10MB那样解决方案10：应该在10M/s以上。解决方案11：也就是说测试网速正常显示是不是应该在10MB以上解决方案12：对 ~通过对数据库的索引,我们还为您准备了：按理论来讲 & 兆数和实际流量比例为10:1左右 & 就是说1M网速在1秒100kb左右 & 其实在100M的网速下 &网速已经没有意义 了 & &一般的机...===========================================所谓的100m宽带不过是噱头罢了,毕竟不是专线,再上网高峰期时候更是不可能达到100m的速度,有一半就不错了。理论上100m的宽带来算,你的下载速率为12.5m/s,你这个一半...===========================================1MB,100MB那是百兆光纤拉。。。===========================================2兆网速等于2048kbps 1KB=1024B 1MB=1024KB 1GB=1024MB 1G=24KB,1KB=1024字节===========================================以太网总线等。Bps:字节每秒,通常对于并行总线设备使用Bps为单位,如并口,IDE硬盘等。换算关系:100Mbps=12.5MB/s一般来说,如果我们说网速为100兆,指的是100兆bps。如...===========================================1mb=mb=100*1024kb===========================================正常情况4兆网速下载1gb需要45分钟或者不到1小时。 依次类推500M 需 25分钟或半小时。 100M需 6分钟左右。 2GB 需 1个半到2小时。 3GB 需 2个半小时左右。 网速...===========================================1M(bps)=125kb/s===========================================这么简单还用问?如果你用的是专线那你的20兆网速等于20M网速就是正确的。(机关,单位,网吧)都是专线的! 如果你拉的是宽带,20M你的下载速度最多也就2-3M的速度。(这就...===========================================迅雷下载一般不会过125KB。最快的时候就是110左右,正常速度是100+。这个跟内存和系统没关系,只跟带宽有关。2兆的也只有220左右。。。===========================================
本文欢迎转载，转载请注明：转载自中国学网： []
用户还关注
可能有帮助查看: 6816|回复: 5
关于网络的速度，比如大B，小b ，多少多少M 是什么意思！ 详解
签到天数: 1367 天[LV.10]以坛为家III
1.计算光纤传输的真实速度
&&使用光纤连接网络具有传输速度快。衰减少等特点。因此很多公司的网络出口都使用光纤。一般网络服务商声称光纤的速度为“ 5M”，那么他的下载真实速度是多少那？我们来计算一下，一般的情况下，“5M”实际上就是5000Kbit/s(按千进位计算）这就存在一个换算的问题。Byte和bit是不同的。1Byte=8bit.而我们常说的下载速度都指的是Byte/s 。因此电信所说的“5M”经过还换算后就成为了（5000/8）KByte/s= 625KByte/s这样我们平时下载速度最高就是625KByte/s，常常表示625KB/S。
&&在实际的情况中，理论值最高为625KB/S。那么还要排除网络损耗以及线路衰减等原因因此真正的下载速度可能还不到600KB/S 不过只要是550KB/S以上都算正常。
2.计算ADSL的真实速度
&&ADSL是大家经常使用的上网方式。那么电信和网通声称的“512K”ADSL下载速度是多少？
换算方法为512Kbit/s=(512/8)KByte/s=64KByte/s,考虑线路等损耗实际的下载速度在50KB/S以上就算正常了 那么“1MB”那？大家算算吧答案是125KByte/s
3.计算内网的传输速度
经常有人抱怨内网的传输的数度慢，那么真实情况下的10/100Mbps网卡的速度应该有多快？网卡的100Mbps同样是以bit/s来定义的，所以100Mb/S＝100000KByte/s=()KByte/s=12500KByte/s 。在理论上1秒钟可以传输12.5MB的速据，考虑到干扰的因素，每秒传输只要超过10MB就是正常了。现在出现了1000Mbps的网卡，那么速度就是100MB/S 。特别提示：
&&1.关于bit(比特)/second(秒)与Byte(字节)/s(秒)的换算说明：线路单位是bps，表示bit(比特)/second(秒)，注意是小写字母b；用户在网上下载时显示的速率单位往往是Byte(字节)/s(秒)，注意是大写字母B。字节和比特之间的关系为1Byte=8Bits；再加上IP包头、HTTP包头等因网络传输协议增加的传输量，显示1KByte/s下载速率时，线路实际传输速率约10kbps。例如：下载显示是50KByte/s时，实际已经达到了500Kbps的速度。切记注意单位！！！
&&2.用户申请的宽带业务速率指技术上所能达到的最大理论速率值，用户上网时还受到用户电脑软硬件的配置、所浏览网站的位置、对端网站带宽等情况的影响，故用户上网时的速率通常低于理论速率值。
&&3.理论上：2M（即2Mb/s）宽带理论速率是：256KB/s（即2048Kb/s），实际速率大约为103--200kB/s；(其原因是受用户计算机性能、网络设备质量、资源使用情况、网络高峰期、网站服务能力、线路衰耗，信号衰减等多因素的影响而造成的)。4M（即4Mb/s）的宽带理论速率是：512KB/s，实际速率大约为200---440kB/s。&&
基础知识：
在计算机科学中，bit是表示信息的最小单位，叫做二进制位；一般用0和1表示。Byte叫做字节，由8个位（8bit）组成一个字节(1Byte)，用于表示计算机中的一个字符。bit与Byte之间可以进行换算，其换算关系为：1Byte=8bit（或简写为：1B=8b）；在实际应用中一般用简称，即1bit简写为1b(注意是小写英文字母b)，1Byte简写为1B（注意是大写英文字母B）。
&&在计算机网络或者是网络运营商中，一般，宽带速率的单位用bps(或b/s)表示；bps表示比特每秒即表示每秒钟传输多少位信息，是bit per second的缩写。在实际所说的1M带宽的意思是1Mbps（是兆比特每秒Mbps不是兆字节每秒MBps）。
&&建议用户记住以下换算公式：
& && &&&1B= 8b1B/s=8b/s( 或& /FONT&1Bps=8bps)
& && &&&1KB=1024B& &&&1KB/s=1024B/s
& && &&&1MB=1024KB& &&&1MB/s=1024KB/s
规范提示：实际书写规范中B应表示Byte(字节)，b应表示bit(比特)，但在平时的实际书写中有的把bit和Byte都混写为b ，如把Mb/s和MB/s都混写为Mb/s，导致人们在实际计算中因单位的混淆而出错。切记注意！！！
4Mbps=4000Kbps/8bit=500KB/S，少了个K&
你举的那几个例子，后面错了几个，网络传输中的通常单位换算，1Gbps=1000Mbps=Kbps=00bps，对应Byte（字节）：125M/S。电信4Mbps宽带为4000bps/8b=500KB/S，非512KB/S。计算机内部才2^10=1024&
经验值 +15
网盟有您更精彩！
网盟有您更精彩！
签到天数: 5 天[LV.2]偶尔看看I
帮顶&&不错
签到天数: 1342 天[LV.10]以坛为家III
普及一下知识&&
签到天数: 750 天[LV.10]以坛为家III
感谢兄弟。
签到天数: 603 天[LV.9]以坛为家II
好帖 学习了 呵呵
签到天数: 218 天[LV.7]常住居民III
网盟推荐 /1
天下网盟自2012年5月正式上线以来，一直以打造优质服务与信誉为宗旨，这几年一直得到网盟会员的大力支持。截至，网盟增值平台注册用户突破30000大关。
Powered by&& 查看话题
求助文献一篇，急用！先谢谢大家了
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp0622381
Novel Photocatalysts for the Decomposition of Organic Dyes Based on Metal-Organic Framework Compounds
怎么给你啊？把你的邮箱告诉我吧，我已经把文献下好了。 AbstractThree novel metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) 2, 1, 2·H2O, 2, and 2, 3, with three-dimensional structures have been synthesized and characterized. The structures of the three compounds appear somewhat related, formed by the connectivity involving the metal polyhedra (Co4N trigonal bipyramids in 1, NiO4N2 octahedra in 2, and ZnO4 tetrahedra and ZnO3N2 trigonal bipyramids in 3), 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoate), and 4,4‘-bipyridine. The photocatalytic studies on 1−3 indicate that they are active catalysts for the degradation of orange G, rhodamine B, Remazol Brilliant Blue R and methylene blue. The compounds have also been characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, IR, thermogravitmetric analysis, UV−vis, photoluminescence, and magnetic studies.
Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableIntroduction
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metal-organic framework (MOF) coordination polymers have received great attention due to their many potential applications ranging from catalysis, gas absorption, molecular recognition, optics, and so on.1-6 The continuing interest in this area is also due to their fascinating structures and many possible metal−ligand coordinations, as well as the aforementioned properties tunable through the variation of building blocks and reaction conditions. Most of the work reported in the literature, in general, concentrated on the benzene dicarboxylates7-15 or pyridine dicarboxylates16-18 of transition elements. Recently, diphenylene dicarboxylates have been shown to give rise to interesting structures with properties.19,20 We have been interested in the study of benzene dicarboxylate based coordination polymers of lanthanides and related systems, resulting in many interesting structures.21,22 In continuation of this theme, we are now studying the reactions involving 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid). As a dicarboxylate ligand, the 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoate) (OBA) appears to possess the following interesting structural characteristics:  (a) There are two carboxyl groups with a 180° angle separated by an oxygen and a benzene ring, which would reduce the steric interference/hindrance. (b) This compound can form rigid frameworks with large channels. (c) This provides an opportunity to study the relative torsional displacement of the benzene rings with respect to the central oxygen atom. The investigations using the oxybis(benzoic acid) as the ligand in the construction of metal-organic framework compounds have been quite limited,23-25 which prompted us to study this ligand in detail. Photocatalysis is being used for the green ecological elimination of organic compounds or harmful pollutants,26,27 but it is also attracting increasing interest as a potentially clean and renewable source for hydrogen fuel by splitting of water into H2 and O2 by means of solar-to-chemical conversion.28-30 The typical solid photocatalysts commonly used are semiconductor metal oxide and sulfide particles such as TiO2, ZnO, WO3, CdS, ZnS, and Fe2O3; layered ni and polyoxometalates (POM), mainly of W.26,27,31-35 On the other hand, it is also of interest to search for new photocatalytic materials with improved properties. In this context, the photocatalytic activities of hybrid compounds containing carboxylate ligand are just beginning to emerge.36-38 We have now isolated three new three-dimensional (3D) framework structures, 2, 1, 2·H2O, 2, and 2, 3, employing 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid), 4,4‘-bipyridine, and the corresponding metal salts. The structures of the three compounds appear somewhat related formed by the connectivity involving the metal polyhedra (CoO4N trigonal bipyramids in 1, NiO4N2 octahedra in 2, and ZnO4 tetrahedra and ZnO3N2 trigonal bipyramids in 3) and the 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoate) anions (OBA). The 4,4‘-bpy acts as a ligand connecting the metal centers in all the compounds. The photocatalytic studies, at room temperature, indicate all three compounds are active for the photodegradation of four commonly used dyes (orange G (OG), rhodamine B (RhB), Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR), and methylene blue (MB)) in the textile industry. The order of photodegradation of the four dyes follows the reverse order of their band gap. In this paper, we present the synthesis, structure, and photocatalytic studies of structures 1−3. Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableExperimental Section
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Materials. The compounds needed for the synthesis of the three coordination polymers, Co (NO3)2·6H2O, Ni (NO3)2·6H2O, and Zn (NO3)2·6H2O (Ranbaxy, 99%), 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) (Lancaster, 99%), 4,4‘-bipyridine (98%), piperazine (Aldrich, 99.99%), NaOH (S. D. Fine-Chem. Ltd, India, 99%) and the organic dyes for the photocatalytic experiments, orange G, rhodamine B, Remazol Brilliant Blue R, and methylene blue (Merck, India), were used as received. The water used was double distilled filtered through a Millipore membrane. Synthesis and Initial Characterization. The two compounds were synthesized by employing hydrothermal methods. In a typical synthesis, for 1, Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.146 g, 0.5 mM) was dissolved in 8 mL of 0.125 M NaOH solution. 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) (OBA, 0.1304 g, 0.5 mM) and 4,4‘-bipyridine (4,4‘-bpy, 0.08 g, 0.5 mM) were then added, with continuous stirring, and the mixture was homogenized at room temperature for 30 min. The final mixture was sealed in a 23 mL PTFE-lined stainless steel acid digestion autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 72 h. The initial and final pH values of the reaction mixture were 5.5 and 5, respectively. The final product, containing large quantities of violet rectangular crystals only, was filtered, washed with deionized water under vacuum, and dried at ambient conditions (yield 70% based on Co). For 2, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.075 g, 0.25 mmol) was dissolved in 3 mL of water along with 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) (4,4‘-OBA, 0.0652 g, 0.25 mmol), piperazine (0.0218 g, 0.25 mmol), and 4,4‘-bipyridine (4,4‘-bipy, 0.04 g, 0.25 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated in a 7 mL autoclave at 180 °C for 72 h. The initial pH of the reaction mixture was 5.5, and there was no change of pH in the final solution. The green color, cubic-like crystals were filtered, washed with water, and dried at ambient conditions (yield 75% based on Ni). For 3, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (0.152 g, 0.5 mM) was dissolved in 8 mL of water. OBA (0.1304 g, 0.5 mM), NaOH (0.04 g, 1 mM), and 4,4‘-bipyridine (0.08 g, 0.5 mM) were added subsequently, and the mixture was sealed in 23 mL PTFE-lined acid digestion autoclaves and heated at 150 °C for 120 h. The initial pH of the reaction mixture was 5.5, and no appreciable change in pH was noted after the reaction. The product contained large quantities of colorless, rodlike crystals only. The crystals were filtered, washed with water, and dried at ambient conditions (yield 75% based on Zn). The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on crushed single crystals in the 2θ range 5−50° using Cu Kα radiation. The XRD patterns indicated that the product the patterns were entirely consistent with the simulated XRD patterns generated based on the structures determined using single-crystal XRD. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been carried out (Metler-Toledo) in air (flow rate = 50 mL/min) in the temperature range 30&# °C (heating rate = 5 °C/min). The studies indicate that all the compounds show one major weight loss in the range 350&# °C. The total observed weight losses of 81.5 and 77%, in the cases of 1 and 3, correspond well with the loss of the OBA anion and 4,4‘-bpy (calcd 82%, 80%). For 2, the total observed weight loss of 83% corresponds to the loss of OBA anion, 4,4-bpy, and lattice water (calcd 84.5%). The final calcined product was found to be crystalline by powder XRD and correspond to Co3O4 (JCPDS:), NiO (JCPDS:	), and ZnO (JCPDS:), respectively. IR spectroscopic studies have been carried out in the mid-IR region as a KBr pellet (Bruker IFS-66v). The results indicate characteristic sharp lines with almost similar bands. Minor variations in the bands have been noticed between the compounds (Table 1).
Table 1:  Observed IR bands for 1, {2}, 2, {2·H2O}, and 3, {2}
bands 1 (cm-1) 2 (cm-1) 3 (cm-1)&&
νas(O−H)&¬ observed&&;(s)&¬ observed&&
νs(C−H)aromatic&&;(w)&&;(m)&&;(w)&&
νs(CO)&&;(m)&&;(m)&&;(s)&&
δ(H2O)&¬ observed&&;(s)&¬ observed&&
νs(C−C)skeletal&&;(m)&&;(m)&&;(m)&&
δ(COO)&&;(s)&&;(s)&&;(s)&&
δ(CHaromatic)in-of-plane&&;(s)&&;(m)&&;(m)&&
δ(C−N)skeletal&&879 (s)&&879 (m)&&879 (s)&&
δ(CHaromatic)out-of-plane&&780 (s)&&780 (w)&&780 (s)
Single-Crystal Structure Determination. A suitable single crystal of each compound was carefully selected under a polarizing microscope and glued to a thin glass fiber. Crystal structure determination by X-ray diffraction was performed on a Siemen's Smart-CCD diffractometer equipped with a normal focus and 2.4 kW sealed tube X-ray source (Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073&A) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. An empirical absorption correction based on symmetry equivalent reflections was applied using the SADABS program.39 The structure was solved and refined using the SHELXTL-PLUS suite of programs.40 All the hydrogen atoms of the carboxylic acids were initially located in the difference Fourier maps, and for the final refinement, the hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically ideal positions and held in the riding mode. The hydrogen atoms of the water molecule were not located in the difference Fourier maps. Final refinement included atomic positions for all the atoms, anisotropic thermal parameters for all the non-hydrogen atoms, and isotropic thermal parameters for all the hydrogen atoms. Full-matrix least-squares refinement against |F|2 was carried out using the SHELXTL-PLUS suite of programs.40 Details of the structure solution and final refinements for 1, 2, and 3 are given in Table 2.
Table 2:  Crystal Data and Structure Refinement Parameters for 1, {2}, 2, {2·H2O}, and 3, {2}a
structure parameter 1 2 3&&
empirical formula&&C38H24N2O10Co2&&C48H34N4O11Ni2&&C38H24N2O10Zn2&&
formula weight&&786.46&&960.2&&799.335&&
crystal system&&monoclinic&&triclinic&&triclinic&&
space group&&C2/c (no.15)&&P1̄ (no.2)&&P1̄ (no.2)&&
a (&A)&&22.493(3)&&11.269(4)&&11.292(3)&&
b (&A)&&13.6914(19)&&11.270(4)&&12.339(3)&&
c (&A)&&12.7681(18)&&20.711(7)&&14.413(3)&&
α (deg)&&90.0&&77.608(5)&&94.857(4)&&
β (deg)&&115.723(3)&&77.608(5)&&109.711(4)&&
γ (deg)&&90.0&&64.727(4)&&108.016(4)&&
volume (&A3)&&)&&)&&)&&
Z&&4&&2&&2&&
T (K)&&293(2)&&293(2)&&293(2)&&
ρcalc (g cm-3)&&1.475&&1.383&&1.511&&
μ (mm-1)&&0.998&&0.882&&1.427&&
θ range (deg)&&1.80 to&#&&1.02 to&#&&1.78 to&#&&
λ (Mo Kα) (&A)&&0.773&&0.71073&&
R indexes &&R1 =, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =&&
R (all data)&&R1 =�, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =&&R1 =, wR2 =
a R1 = Σ ||F0| − |Fc||/Σ |F0|; wR2 = {Σ /Σ }1/2; w = 1/; P = /3, where a = 0.0564 and b =0.000 for 1, a = 0.0638 and b = 0.7061 for 2, and a =0.0563 and b = 0.0837 for 3.
Photocatalytic Experiments. The photochemical reactor employed in this study was comprised of a jacketed quartz tube of 3.4 cm inner diameter (i.d.), 4 cm outer diameter (o.d.), and 21 cm length and an outer Pyrex glass reactor of 5.7 cm i.d. and 16 cm length. A high-pressure mercury vapor lamp (HPML) of 125 W (Philips, India) was placed inside the jacketed quartz tube after removal of the outer shell. The ballast and capacitor were connected in a series with the lamp to avoid fluctuations in input supply. Water was circulated through the annulus of the quartz tube to avoid heating of the solution due to dissipative loss of UV energy. The solution was taken in the outer reactor and continuously stirred to ensure that the suspension of the catalyst was uniform. The lamp radiated predominantly at 365 nm corresponding to an energy of 3.4 eV, and the photon flux is 5.8 × 10-6 moles of photons per second. Further details of the experimental setup can be found elsewhere.34 For the degradation studies, the dyes were dissolved in double distilled Millipore filtered water. The effect of the initial concentration of the dyes and the effect of catalyst loading on the reaction rates were investigated. The reactions were carried out at 40 °C, which was maintained by circulating water in the annulus of the jacketed quartz reactor. Samples were collected at regular intervals, filtered through Millipore membrane filters, and centrifuged to remove the catalyst particles prior to analysis, as described below. Samples were analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer UV−vis spectrophotometer (model Lambda 32). The calibration for OG, RhB, RBBR, and MB was based on the Beer−Lambert law at its maximum absorption wavelengths, λmax, of 481, 554, 590, and 661 nm, respectively. Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableResults and Discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Structure of 1, { 2}. The asymmetric unit of 1 consists of 26 non-hydrogen atoms, of which one cobalt atom is crystallographically independent. The Co2+ ions have a distorted trigonal biprismatic geometry formed by four carboxylate oxygen atoms and a nitrogen atom of the 4,4‘-bipyridine. The Co−O bond distances have an average value of 2.024 &A, and the Co−N distance has a value of 2.103(3) &A. The O/N−Co−O/N bond angles are in the range 85.8 (1)&#(1)°. There is only one OBA anion present in the structure, and the carboxylates have bis-bidentate connectivity with the Co2+ cations forming a eight-membered ring. The bond distances and angles associated with the OBA anions are in the ranges expected for this type of bonding. The selected bond distances 1 are listed in Table 3. The connectivity between Co2+, OBA anions, and 4,4‘-bpy gives rise to a 3D structure. The complex structure of 1 can be understood in terms of simpler building units. Thus, the Co2+ ions are linked to the carboxylate units giving rise to an eight-membered ring, which are further connected through their corners forming a 1D chain structure. The chain structure resembles the commonly observed corner-shared 1D phosphate structure.41
Table 3:  Selected Bond Distances in 1, {2}
bond distance, &A bond distance, &A&&
Co(1)−O(1)&&2.012(3)&&Co(1)−O(4)&&1.973(3)&&
Co(1)−O(2)&&2.085(3)&&Co(1)−N(1)&&2.103(3)&&
Co(1)−O(3)&&2.024(3)& && &
The connectivity between the corner-shared eight-membered ring chains and the OBA anions forms a layer (Figure 1a), which is cross-linked by the 4,4‘-bpy molecules giving rise to the 3D structure. The 4, 4‘-bpy molecules have both in-plane and out-of-plane connectivity. Viewing down the c axis, the linkages between the Co2+ ions and the OBA anions are cross-linked by the 4,4‘-bpy molecules (Figure 1b). The entire structure appears to have an efficient packing for optimum π···π interactions between the OBA anions and 4,4‘-bpy molecules.
Figure 1 (a) Connectivity between the Co2+ and OBA anions. (b) Connectivity along the c axis.
Structure of 2, { 2·H2O}. The asymmetric unit of 2 consists of 66 non-hydrogen atoms, of which two nickel atoms are crystallographically independent. Both the Ni2+ ions have distorted octahedral coordination formed by four carboxylate oxygen atoms and two nitrogen atoms of the 4,4‘-bipyridine ligand. The Ni−O distances are in the range 2.009(3)&#(3) &A (av. Ni−O = 2.072), and the Ni−N distances have an average value of 2.094 &A. The O/N−Ni(1)−O/N bond angles are in the range 61.94(12)&#(14)°. There are two OBA anions present in the structure, and the carboxylates bond with the Ni2+ ions to form eight-membered rings. The bond distances and angles associated with the OBA anions are in the ranges expected for this type of bonding. The selected bond distances for 2 are listed in Table 4.
Table 4:  Selected Bond Distances in 2, {2·H2O}
bond distance, &A bond distance, &A&&
Ni(1)−O(1)&&2.114(3)&&Ni(2)−O(5)a&&2.009(3)&&
Ni(1)−O(2)&&2.127(3)&&Ni(2)−O6)b&&2.036(3)&&
Ni(1)−O(3)&&2.009(3)&&Ni(2)−O(7)&&2.129(3)&&
Ni(1)−O(4)&&2.037(3)&&Ni(2)−O(8)&&2.116(3)&&
Ni(1)−N(1)&&2.099(3)&&Ni(2)−N(4)&&2.100(3)&&
Ni(1)−N(2)&&2.088(3)&&Ni(2)−N(21)&&2.087(3)
a Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  x + 2, y − 2, z.b Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1.
The 3D structure of 2 is built-up from the connectivity involving Ni2+, OBA anions, and 4,4-bpy ligands. As in 1, the connectivity between the Ni2+ cations and OBA anions gives rise to eight-membered rings. This is the simplest building unit in 2. The overall structure of 2, though complex, can be understood by considering smaller fragments and taking connectivity into consideration. Thus, the connectivity between the Ni2+ ions and OBA anions forms a 2D porous grid in the (110) plane (Figure 2a), which is cross-linked by the 4,4‘-bpy ligands forming the 3D structure (Figure 2b).
Figure 2 (a) Connectivity between Ni2+ ions and OBA anions forming a two-dimensional grid in the (110) plane. (b) Three-dimensional structure.
Structure of 3, { 2}. The asymmetric unit of 3 consists of 52 non-hydrogen atoms, of which two zinc atoms are crystallographically independent. While the Zn(1) has a distorted trigonal biprismatic geometry formed by three carboxylate oxygen atoms and two nitrogen atom of the 4,4‘-bipyridine, Zn(2) has a distorted tetrahedral geometry connected by four carboxylate oxygen atoms. The Zn−O distances are in the range 1.932(2)&#(2) &A (av Zn(1)−O = 2.0774 and Zn(2)−O = 1.945 &A), and Zn−N distances have an average value of 2.109 &A. The O/N−Zn(1)−O/N bond angles are in the range 87.13(8)&#(9)°, and the distorted tetrahedral O−Zn(2)−O bond angles have the average value of 109.3°. There are two OBA anions present in the structure, and the carboxylates bond with the Zn2+ ions to form two types of eight-membered rings. The bond distances and angles associated with the OBA anions are in the ranges expected for this type of bonding. The selected bond distances for 3 are listed in Table 5.
Table 5:  Selected Bond Distances in 3, {2}
bond distance, &A bond distance, &A&&
Zn(1)−O(1)&&2.093(2)&&Zn(1)−N(1)&&2.119(2)&&
Zn(1)−O(2)&&2.0891(19)&&Zn(1)−N(2)&&2.098(2)&&
Zn(1)−O(3)&&2.0501(19)&&Zn(2)−O(4)b&&1.958(2)&&
Zn(2)−O(6)a&&1.932(2)&&O(4)−Zn(2)b&&1.958(2)&&
Zn(2)−O(7)&&1.939(2)&&O(6)−Zn(2)d&&1.932(2)&&
Zn(2)−O(5)&&1.952(2)& && &
a Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  x, y, z − 1.b Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  −x, −y + 2, −z + 1.c Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  −x, −y + 1, −z.d Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms:  x, y, z + 1.
The connectivity in 3, between Zn2+, OBA anions, and 4,4‘-bpy, gives rise to a 3D structure. There are two types of OBA anions:  acid-1 is connected to two Zn(1) atoms and one Zn(2) atom and acid-2 is connected to three Zn(2) atoms and one Zn(1) atom, through the carboxylate oxygen atoms. This gives rise to one of the carboxylate oxygen atoms of acid-2 being free. The Zn2+ ions are linked to the carboxylate units giving rise to two different eight-membered rings, which are further connected by the OBA anions giving rise to a layerlike structure in the bc plane (Figure 3a). Unlike 1, the eight-membered rings are not connected together in 3. The layers are further connected by both the OBA anions and the 4,4‘-bpy ligands. The arrangement of the structure in the ac plane is shown in Figure 3b. As can be noted, the Zn(1) atoms are connected by two sets of 4,4‘-bpy ligands forming a 1D structure, which are connected by the OBA ligands with the Zn(2) eight-membered rings.
Figure 3 (a) Layer structure formed by the connectivity between Zn2+ and OBA. (b) Three-dimensional structure formed by the connectivity involving the 4,4‘-bpy units.
Three new compounds, 1, 2, and 3, have been prepared, which have 3D connectivity resulting from the expected building units of OBA anions, 4,4‘-bpy ligands, and the central M2+ ion. There are, however, subtle differences in the coordination geometry around the central M2+ ions. In 1, the Co2+ ions have distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry (four oxygens and a nitrogen), in 2, the Ni2+ ions have octahedral geometry (four oxygens and two nitrogens), and the Zn2+ ions have both the tetrahedral (four oxygens) and the trigonal bipyramidal (three oxygens and two nitrogens) geometries in 3. The formation of tetrahedral Zn is not common in MOF compounds. In many transition metal benzenecarboxylates, the octahedral coordination is most often encountered. The formation of five-coordinated Co2+ and Zn2+ ions, in 1 and 3, is probably due to the differences in the reaction conditions.2,4,5 The OBA anion can be considered similar to the water molecule. The angle between H−O−H is 104.5°, and the free acid has an angle of 122.5° suspended between the two benzene rings. The large angles in the free OBA acid might be due to hydrogen bond interactions. In compounds 1−3, the angles between the OBA anions with respect to the central oxygen atom are 118.1° (1), 117.6 and 117.3° (2), and 115.4 and 118.5° (3). The observed angles in the compounds are similar to the angles observed in diphenyl ether and other related compounds. The role of π···π interactions in the stability of supramolecularly engineered crystal structures have been well established.42,43 In recent years, in the MOFs formed using benzenecarboxylates, the role of π···π interactions has been a topic of much interest. In the present compounds, we find two types of π···π interactions:  one homo interaction involving similar species, for example, the two OBA anions or two 4,4‘-bpy ligands, and a hetero interaction involving the OBA anions and 4,4‘-bipyridine ligand. In 1, we find only the hetero interaction, and in 2, we find only the homo interaction, and both homo and hetero interactions have been observed in 3. The role of π···π interactions for the stability of organic compounds has been discussed in the literature with particular emphasis on the centroid−centroid distances (d) and the angles (θ) suspended between the benzene rings.42,43 A correlation between the two (d and θ) has been discussed in terms of a phase diagram with the distances and angles having a unique relationship. From this, the following interactions appear to be important for different values of the centroid−centroid distance (d) and angles (θ):  (i) d = 0−3 &A and θ = 50−90°, (ii) d = 3−7 &A and θ = 0−50°, (iii) d = 4&# &A and θ = 140&#°, and (iv) d = 6−7 &A and θ = 0&#°. The centroid−centroid distance (d) and the interplanar angles (θ) between the ligands in all the compounds are shown in Figure 4, which clearly indicates favorable π···π interactions in all the compounds. For 1, we find interactions between OBA and 4,4-bpy with d = 3.9 &A and θ = 12°, in 2, the two 4.4‘-bpy ligands have d = 4.5 &A and θ = 25.5°, which are less favorable, and in 3, we find two distances and angles due to the positioning of the OBA anions and 4,4‘-bpy. Thus, d = 3.8 and 4 &A with θ = 15 and 19° have been observed (Figure 4c). In addition, homo interactions between 4,4‘-bpy and the OBA anions have also been encountered in 3 (parts d and e of Figure 4). The distances and angles between the two OBA anions and the 4, 4‘-bpy ligands in 3 are as follows:  for OBA, d = 3.88 &A and θ = 4° and for 4,4‘-bpy, d = 4.13 &A and θ = 1.7°.
Figure 4 Possible π···π interactions between the various participating ligands:  (a) 1, (b) 2, and (c)−(e) 3.
To understand the nature and role of the π···π interactions, we have performed preliminary calculations using the AM1 parametrized Hamiltonian available in the Gaussian set of codes.44,45 Using the crystal structure geometry, we have made an evaluation of the strength of the π···π interactions in 1 and 2 based on single-point energy calculation without the symmetry constraints. The calculated π···π interaction energies between 4,4‘-bpy and OBA were found to be 4.3 kcal/mol and 4.8 kcal/mol, respectively, for 1 and 3. The π···π interaction energy between the two 4, 4‘-bpy compounds was found to be 1.83 kcal/mol in 2. The π···π interaction energies, in 3, between the two 4,4‘-bpy and the two OBA anions were found to be 4.12 and 1.5 kcal/mol. The calculated energies suggest that they are comparable to the energies encountered in systems involving weak hydrogen bonds (3−6 kcal/mol).46 It is interesting to note that, in 1 and 2, only one type of π···π interaction (between OBA&#‘-bpy) and (between two 4,4‘-bpy) has been observed. In the case of 3, however, three distinct types have been encountered (OBA&#‘-bpy, OBA−OBA, and 4,4‘-bpy&#‘-bpy). It is becoming clear that the π···π interactions appear to play an important role, as the weak hydrogen bonds in some of the supramolecularly arranged structures and in the structural arrangement and the stability of MOF compounds. The geometry of 4,4‘-bipyridine in the three compounds is different with varying degrees of twist angles between the two pyridine rings. The twist angles are 0.23°, 25.60°, and 4.26°, respectively, for 1, 2, and 3. The calculated twist angle between the two pyridine rings in 4,4‘-bpy, in the gas phase, is 35.56°. This shows the subtle influence affected by the participating OBA ligands and the M2+ ions. The diffuse reflectance UV−vis spectra at room temperature were recorded for the sodium salt of OBA and for the as-synthesized coordination polymers (Figure S6). In all cases, the main absorption bands are at 311, 294, 290, and 275 nm, for 1, 2, 3, and Na−OBA, respectively. The bands can be assigned to ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT). As can be noted, the absorption maximum of the LMCT band of the Na−OBA is blue shifted compared with the LMCT band of the three compounds. This may be due to the fact that the Na+1 ion is more electropositive than the Zn2+, Ni2+, and Co2+ ions and would require more energy for the transfer of the charge from the ligand to the metal. It is well established that the polarizability of the four ions are in the order Co2+ > Ni2+ > Zn2+ > Na+1, and hence, the energy required for the LMCT would be in the reverse order.47 In the case of 1, we also observe two clear additional peaks at 480 and 575 nm and a broad one at a higher wavelength. The peaks at 480 and 575 nm, probably, originate from the d−d transition of the d7 (Co2+) ion. The Co2+ ions in 1 are in a trigonal bipyramidal environment, and the peaks at 480 and 575 nm can be assigned to 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘ ‘(P) and 4A‘2(F) → 4A‘2(P), and the broad peak at higher wavelength could be due to 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘(F) and 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘ ‘(F) transitions.48 Similarly, the other peaks in 2 may also originate from the d−d transition of the d8(Ni2+) ion. Ni2+ ions are in an octahedral environment so the peaks at 361 and 656 nm can be assigned to 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(P) and 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(F), respectively.48 To obtain the precise values of band gap from the absorption edges, the point of inflection determined from the minimum in the first derivative of the absorption spectrum was used. The values of the band gap, thus obtained corresponding to the LMCT transitions from the UV−vis spectra, are 3.11, 3.89, and 4.02 eV for 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Room-temperature solid-state photoluminescence studies were carried out on powdered samples (Perkin-Elmer, U.K.) (Figure S7). Photoluminescence studies of the MOF compounds here have been investigated in great detail during the past few years.49-52 In our present study, we found that all three MOF compounds 1, 2, and 3 and Na−OBA exhibit photoluminescence. To understand the nature of the emission bands, we have confirmed that both free 4,4‘-oxybis(benzoic acid) and 4,4‘-bipyridine ligands do not emit any luminescence in the range 400&# nm.24 Compound 1 exhibits a broad emission band at 430 nm and two more peaks at 483 nm and at 525 nm, when excited at 235 nm. The emission peak at 430 nm for 1 may be due to the ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) and the peaks at 483 nm and at 525 nm can be assigned to the 4A‘2(F) → 4E‘ ‘(P) and 4A‘2(F) → 4A‘2(P) transitions coming from the d−d transition of the d7(Co2+) system.48 Compound 2exhibits a broad emission peak at 443 nm and two more peaks at 483 nm and at 525 nm, when excited at 235 nm. The emission peak at 443 nm may be due to the LMCT band and the peaks at 483 nm and at 524 nm can be assigned to the 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(P) and 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(F) transitions coming from the d−d transition of the d8(Ni2+) system.48 Compound 3, on the other hand, exhibits a single broad emission band at 436 nm, when excited at 235 nm. This peak can be assigned to the LMCT band. The single peak for compound 3 also confirms that the two low intensity peaks observed for compounds 1 and 2 are due to the d−d transitions not from the ligands. The Na−OBA also exhibits one broad emission band at 410 nm, when excited at 235 nm, which is due to the LMCT. The different positioning of the main emission peaks in 1−3 indicates that the band is due to the LMCT and not from the intraligand fluorescence. Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements for 1 and 2 have been performed on powder samples using a SQUID magnetometer (Figure 5). In the case of Co2+ and Ni2+ compounds, the first-order spin−orbital interactions and the orbital contribution have a significant contribution to the exchange magnetic coupling parameter due to the orbitally degenerate electronic ground state of Co2+ and Ni2+.53 These contributions are completely suppressed for octahedral geometry around Ni2+, but for Co2+ in the trigonal bipyramidal geometry, the orbital contribution has significant input to the magnetic moment at room temperature. The observed effective magnetic moment of compound 1 at room temperature (300 K) is 4.44 μB, which corresponds to the value expected for noninteracting paramagnetic Co2+ ions with significant orbital contribution, as the spin-only moment of the Co2+ ion is 3.87 μB. A plot of 1/χM vs T for 1 was found to be liner in the range 50&# K with a Weiss temperature (θP) of −11 K and a Curie constant (C) of 2.5 emu/mol. The negative Weiss temperature (θP) indicates weak antiferromagnetic interactions in 1.54,55 The effective magnetic moment of 2 at room temperature (300 K) is 2.97 μB which corresponds to the value expected for noninteracting paramagnetic Ni2+ ions, a value that is very close to the Ni2+ spin-only moment of 2.83 μB. A plot of 1/χM vs T for 2 was found to be linear in the range 50&# K with a Weiss temperature (θP) of −15 K and a Curie constant (C) of 1.13 emu/mol. The negative θP values, again, indicate the presence of weak antiferromagnetic interactions in 2.54,55
Figure 5 Temperature variation of the molar magnetic susceptibility (χM) for 1 (a) and for 2 (b). The inset shows the corresponding 1/χM vs T plots.
Photocatalytic Investigations. Photocatalytic degradation of four commonly used dyes, orange G (OG), rhodamine B (RhB), Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR), and methylene blue (MB), was investigated. These four dyes were selected as model dye pollutants in aqueous media to demonstrate the efficacies of the photocatalytic behavior of the three polymers. The photocatalytic performance of the three polymers was estimated from the variation of the color in the reaction system by monitoring the absorbance (at λ = 482, 554, 590, and 661 nm) characteristic of the targets OG, RhB, RBBR, and MB which directly relate to the structural changes of their chromophore. For comparison, the photocatalytic performance of commercial TiO2 (Degussa P-25) was also assessed under the same experimental conditions. Control experiments without catalyst, UV, and both were also carried out:  while no degradation was observed with catalyst only in the absence of UV, degradation was observed in the absence of catalyst in the presence of UV. The degradation profiles of all the four dyes with an initial concentration of 100 ppm by using three compounds, TiO2 (Degussa P-25) and dyes with out catalysts are shown in Figure 6 where the catalysts concentration are constant (2 kg/m3) for each case.
Figure 6 Degradation profiles of all four dyes with an initial concentration of 100 ppm without catalyst (a), with Degussa P-25 (b), with compound 1 (c), with compound 2 (d), and with compound 3 (e).
The degradation of four different dyes was investigated with a loading of 2 kg/m3. To quantify the reactions, the kinetics was determined by the Langmuir−Hinshelwood (L−H) kinetic. This can be written as r0 = k0C0/(1 + K0C0), where r0 is the initial rate, C0 is the initial concentration of the dyes, k0 is the kinetic rate constant, and parameter K0 represents the equivalent adsorption coefficient. The plots of the reciprocal initial degradation rate (1/ro) with the reciprocal of the initial dye concentration (1/C0) by using 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figure 7. The values of the parameters, k0 and K0, for the photocatalytic degradation of the dyes, obtained from the slope and the intercept of the linear plot, are shown in Table 6.
Figure 7 Variation of the initial photodegradation rate with the initial concentration of the four dyes for (a) 3, (b) 2, and (c) 1. Note that in all the cases a linear correlation with a regression coefficient >0.99 has been observed.
Table 6:  Kinetic Parameters for the Degradation of Dyes Using Three Compounds
compound dye k0 (min-1) K0 (ppm-1)&&
1&&OG&&0.031&&0.0022&&
1&&RhB&&0.013&&0.0035&&
1&&RBBR&&0.033&&0.0007&&
1&&MB&&0.032&&0.0064&&
2&&OG&&0.029&&0.0049&&
2&&RhB&&0.008&&0.0023&&
2&&RBBR&&0.029&&0.0015&&
2&&MB&&0.027&&0.0027&&
3&&OG&&0.02&&0.0029&&
3&&RhB&&0.007&&0.002&&
3&&RBBR&&0.028&&0.0069&&
3&&MB&&0.023&&0.0029
As the parameter, K0, represents the adsorption equilibrium coefficient, the low value of K0 can be attributed to negligible adsorption. This is also confirmed by powder XRD of the catalyst after the photocatalytic degradation experiments, which clearly indicated that the structure remained the same and no adsorption was observed. For the degradation of all four dyes, the order of degradation is 1 > 2 > 3. The band gaps of 1, 2, and 3 follow the order 1 < 2 < 3; the degradation of all dyes follow the reverse order. The photocatalytic activity of the present compounds can be explained based on some of the earlier observations. Several Co complexes with chelating nitrogen ligands catalyze oxidation reactions, for example, 2+ activates O2 and oxidizes N-methyl-anilines, benzyl alcohols, and aldehydes.56 Polydentate CoII complexes with ligands capable of intercalation into DNA strands are capable of inducing DNA cleavage under photochemical conditions.57 The activation of O2 in the above systems occurs through the ligand-to-metal charge transfer. The oxidations of organic compounds by using other transition metal compounds with chelating ligand occur through the same principle in the presence of light. In the present compounds, we have a similar situation as metal exists in M+2 states. From our UV−vis spectroscopic study, we clearly see two types of transition:  the most intense peak originates due to the LMCT and the other peaks belong to the d−d spin allowed transition. Although the photocatalytic experiments on 1, 2, and 3 were carried out in heterogeneous conditions, it is believed that the photocatalytically active metal center would behave in a way similar to that in solution. Of the two types of electronic states observed in the compounds, the LMCT effect, which is in the UV region, probably is responsible for the photocatalytic activity.53 To understand the photocatalytic degradation of the organic dyes, we employ a simple approach based upon highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) considerations. Accordingly, the HOMO and LUMO of the charge transfer state, in the absence of the UV light, would have two electrons in the HOMO and the LUMO would be vacant. In the presence of UV light, there is an electron transfer from the HOMO to LUMO. The electron of the excited state in the LUMO is usually very easily lost, while the HOMO strongly demands one electron to return to its stable state. Generally, the excited M+2 center decays to its ground state quickly. However, if some molecules are within a reasonable range and have an appropriate orientation, for example, RhB in this case, transitional active complexes can be formed. Thus, one α-hydrogen atom of the methylene group bonded to the electron-withdrawing nitrogen atom of RhB, which will give up its electron and leave as H+ later, is abstracted by metal species, and this results in the cleavage of the C−N bond and stepwise N-deethylation of RhB. Since the HOMO is then reoccupied, the excited electron must remain in the LUMO until it is captured by electronegative substances such as molecular oxygen in solution, which would transform into highly active peroxide anion and subsequently accomplish further oxidation and total degradation of RhB. A similar mechanism has been proposed recently for the degradation of organic dyes in the presence of metal carboxylates.37 Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableConclusions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The synthesis and structure of three new coordination polymers has been accomplished by employing hydrothermal methods. The samples have been characterized using a variety of techniques such as powder XRD, single-crystal XRD, IR, UV−vis, photoluminescence, magnetic, and photocatalytic studies. All the compounds appear to be active for the photocatalytic decomposition of common organic dyes (OG, RhB, RBBR, and MB) used in textile industries, with activities better than Degussa P-25 TiO2 catalysts. A possible mechanism, through an activated complex involving M+2, has been proposed. This study clearly reveals that it is profitable to investigate metal carboxylates for photocatalytic activity. Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableAcknowledgment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.N. thanks the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, for the award of a research grant, and P.M. thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, for the award of a research fellowship.
Top of PageIntroductionExperimental SectionResults and DiscussionConclusionsSupporting Information AvailableSupporting Information Available
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powder X-ray patterns of (a) simulated and (b) experimental of 1 (Figure S1); powder X-ray patterns of (a) simulated and (b) experimental of 2 (Figure S2); powder X-ray patterns of (a) simulated and (b) experimental of 3 (Figure S3); TGA studies of the three compounds (Figure S4); IR spectra of the three compounds (Figure S5); UV−vis spectra of the three compounds and Na salt of OBA (Figure S6); Photoluminescence spectra of the three compounds and Na salt of OBA (Figure S7); Bond angles of the three compounds (Table S1−S3). CCDC:&#&# contain(s) the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper (Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. This article references 57 other publications.
(1) Ocwig, N. W.; Friedrichs, O.-D.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 6.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(2) Ferey, G. Nat. Mater. 7.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(3) Moulton, B.; Zawarotko, M. J. Chem. Rev. , 1629.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(4) Bradshaw, D.; Claridge, J. B.; Cussen, E. J.; Prior, T. J.; Rosseinksy, M. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 3.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(5) Rao, C. N. R.; Natarajan, S.; Vaidhyanathan, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 66.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(6) Seo, J. S.; Whang, D.; Lee, H.; Jun, S. I.; Oh, J.; Jeon, Y. J.; Kim, K. Nature , 982.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(7) Rosi, N. L.; Eukert, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Vodak, D. T.; Kim, J.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Science , 1127.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(8) Barthelet, K.; Marrot, J.; Ferey, G.; Riou, D. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(9) Zhao, X.; Xiao, B.; Fletcher, A. J.; Thomas, K. M.; Bradshaw, D.; Rosseinsky, M. J. Science , 1012.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Dybtsev, D. N.; Chun, H.; Kim, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 33.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(11) Biradha, K.; Fujita, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 92.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(12) Serre, C.; Ferey, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 9574.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(13) Cutland, A. D.; Halfen, J. A.; Kampf, J. W.; Pecoraro, V. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 6211.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(14) Pan, L.; Zheng, N. W.; Wu, Y. G.; Han, S.; Yang, R. Y.; Huang, X. Y. Inorg. Chem. 8.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(15) Li, L. C.; Liao, D. Z.; Jiang, Z. H.; Yan, S. P. Inorg. Chem. 1.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(16) Liu, Y.; Kravtsov, V.; Walsh, R.; Poddar, P.; Srikanth, H.; Eddaoudi, M. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(17) Eubank, J. F.; Walsh, R. D.; Eddaoudi, M. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(18) Min, D.; Yoon, S. S.; Lee, S. W. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 3.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(19) Guo, X.; Zhu, G.; Fang, Q.; Xue, M.; Tian, G.; Sun, J.; Li, X.; Qiu, S. Inorg. Chem. 50.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Shiu, K. B.; Lee, H. C.; Lee, G. H.; Ko, B. T.; Wang, Y.; Lin, C. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 99.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(21) Thirumurugan, A.; Natarajan, S. Dalton Trans. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(22) Thirumurugan, A.; Pati, S. K.; Green, M. A.; Natarajan, S. J. Mater. Chem. 37.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(23) Kondo, M.; Irie, Y.; Shimizu, Y.; Miyazawa, M.; Kawaguchi, H.; Nakamura, A.; Naito, T.; Maeda, K.; Uchida, F. Inorg. Chem. 39.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(24) Tao, J.; Shi, J. X.; Tong, M. L.; Zhang, X. X.; Chen, X. M. Inorg. Chem. 28.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(25) Han, Z. B.; Cheng, X. N.; Chen, X. M. Cryst. Growth Des. 5.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(26) Hoffmann, M. R.; Martin, S. T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D. W. Chem. Rev. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(27) Meunier, B. Science , 270.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(28) Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Nature , 37.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(29) Khaselev, O.; Turner, J. A. Science , 425.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Zou, Z.; Ye, J.; Sayama, K.; Arakawa, H. Nature , 625.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(31) Papaconstantinou, E. Chem. Soc. Rev. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(32) Yoshimura, J.; Ebina, Y.; Kondo, J.; Domen, K.; Tanaka, A. J. Phys. Chem. 70.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(33) Saupe, G. B.; Mallouk, T. E.; Kim, W.; Schmehl, R. H. J. Phys. Chem. B , 2508.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(34) Sivalingam, G.; Nagaveni, K.; Hegde, M. S.; Madras, G. Appl. Catal., B .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(35) Muktha, B.; Priya, M. H.; Madras, G.; Guru Row, T. N. J. Phys. Chem. B , 11442.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(36) Yu, Z. T.; Liao, Z. L.; Jiang, Y. S.; Li, G. H.; Li, G. D.; Chen, J. S. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(37) Yu, Z. T.; Liao, Z. L.; Jiang, Y. S.; Li, G. H.; Chen, J. S. Chem.−Eur. J. 42.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(38) Mahata, P.; Sankar, G.; Madras, G.; Natarajan, S. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(39) Sheldrich, G. M. SADABS Siemens Area Detector Absorption Correction P University of G&ttingen:  G&ttingen, Germany, 1994.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL-PLUS program for Crystal Structure Solution and R University of G&ttingen:  G&ttingen, Germany, 1997.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(41) Rao, C. N. R.; Natarajan, S.; Neeraj, S.; Choudhury, A.; Ayi, A. A. Acc. Chem. Res. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(42) Hunter, C. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , ;5534.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(43) Hunter, C. A.; Singh, J.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Mol. Biol. , 837&#.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(44) Gaussian 03, revision B.05; Gaussian Inc.:  Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(45) Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 3902.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(46) Scheiner, S. Hydrogen Bonding:  A Theoretical P Oxford University Press:  New York, 1997.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(47) Huheey, J.; Keiter, E. A.; Keiter, R. L. Inorganic Chemistry:  Principles of structure and reactivity, 4 Pearson Education:  New York, 2000.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(48) Lever, A. B. P. Inorganic Electronic S Elsevier:  New York, 1968.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(49) He, J.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Xu, R. Inorg. Chem. 79.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Tong, M. L.; S, Hu.; Kitwaga, S.; Ng, S. W. Inorg. Chem. 7.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(51) Chen, Y. B.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, J. K.; Kang, Y.; Li, Z. J.; Yao, Y. G. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 39.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(52) Dai, J. C.; Wu, X. T.; Fu, Z. Y.; Hu, S. M.; Du, W. X.; Cui, C. P. Chem. Commun. 2002, 12.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(53) Goodenough, J. B. Magnetism a Interscience Publishers:  New York, 1966.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(54) Tynan, E.; Jensen, P.; Kelly, N. R.; Kruger, P. E.; Lees, A. C.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K. S. Dalton Trans. .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(55) Yuan, Y. P.; Wang, R. Y.; Kong, D. Y.; Mao, J. G.; Clearfield, A. J. Solid State Chem. , 2030.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(56) Cotton, F. A.; Wilkinson, G.; Murillo, C. A.; Bachmann, M. Advanced Inorganic C John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:  New York, 1999.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
(57) Bhattacharya, S.; Mandal, S. S. Chem. Commun. .There is no corresponding record for this reference. : Originally posted by digghost at
AbstractThree novel metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) 2, 1, 2·H2O, 2, and 2, 3, with three-dimensional structures have been synthesized and characterized. The structures of the three compounds appear&&... 三楼真狠，膜拜中，你上传到网盘给他个网址就行了吧~ : Originally posted by pypypy-317 at
怎么给你啊？把你的邮箱告诉我吧，我已经把文献下好了。 我的邮箱，，谢谢啦！ : Originally posted by meizi0314 at
我的邮箱，，谢谢啦！... 因为我不是常在线，刚看到你的消息，文献已经给你发过过去了，请注意查收。}
我要回帖
更多关于 1kb等于多少mb 的文章
更多推荐
- ·学西餐培训学校哪家比较不错的培训？
- ·秦舒培为什么要晒陈吴冠希家境女儿的照片呢！
- ·如何评价第一夫人品牌什么档次这部电影
- ·为什么日剧app哪个好用日影的周边经常有小熊公仔啊
- ·王尼玛为什么一定要戴塞尔达人马头套怎么拿
- ·ins为什么上不了ins不能上
- ·奇游记朱雀七星宿宿照片
- ·办理了家庭网打长号独奏还花钱吗
- ·怀孕快怀孕八个月胃疼怎么办了，和男朋友分手了。不能让爸妈知道，也没朋友能借到钱，我该怎么办。
- ·为什么social club登陆不上上？
- ·damned steam头像上传失败买的运行失败C++问题
- ·摇号密码忘了怎么办忘记密码,怎么改密码都改不掉
- ·三星sch p709电信版p709三网机不吃电信卡是怎么回事
- ·六间房薄荷直播间在线积红包必须进入直播间吗
- ·官方4399皮卡堂修改器绑定邮箱怎么改
- ·三星a7忘记锁屏密码充满电时的锁屏是什么样的
- ·399828010是什么地方我的qq中心
- ·大主宰怎么卸载打不出彩蛋
- ·家庭里有什么可以代替卸妆油水使用的?
- ·1.72gb等于多少mbb 谢谢啦！
- ·范冰冰qq号是多少的qq号是不88597
- ·美能达奔驰c450 amg打出的彩照不好看什么原因
- ·麻烦全职高手荣耀logologo设计
- ·1988年12月10日的1988年龙女和1990年马配魂12月3日的马男相配吗
- ·电脑换系统WiFi重装系统后连不上wifi了
- ·市长,市长我爱你txt书包网百度云 谢谢/
- ·怎么突破天龙八部3d等级限制一台电脑只能挂两个号的限制
- ·想换个显卡，求大神ps搞笑图片合集帮我看一下怎么搞~
- ·出生四天的毛毛黄疸指数正常值21.但能吃能拉一天拉三次,老是放屁!请问问题大吗
- ·赢政天下邀请码hd读书被要有邀请去读书，读书期间内还可以被别的好友邀请吗
- ·齐民思篮花五粮液1618陶瓷52度度的多少钱?
- ·我是歌手里孙腩穿的棒球服哪个牌子好衣是啥牌子的
- ·罗斯4.5配色这三个配色哪个好看啊求推荐
- ·请问阿迪达斯三叶草板鞋喜水库红D67351是新款吗？
- ·初学气功传奇，能同时修练两门气功传奇功吗？
