初三英语补全对话A：Hi,____________________B:I am playingfootball.________________A:Soory,i am busy at the moment.by the way,_________________B:why not?A；it is too dangerous.can not see there is too much traffic?you must be careful.B:oh,thanks.why are you so busy?___________________A:i am going to uncle wang's.he is mending my TV set.______________oh,i must go now,it is late.B:be careful .you must not ride too fast.A:OK,bye bye
抓杀权限40
A：Hi,_____________What are you doing now?_______B:I am playingfootball._______would you like to play together?_________A:Soory,i am busy at the moment.by the way,________why do you play on the road?_________B:why not?A；it is too dangerous.can not see there is too much traffic?you must be careful.B:oh,thanks.why are you so busy?_____Where are you going?______________A:i am going to uncle wang's.he is mending my TV set.______I just go there to get it back.________oh,i must go now,it is late.B:be careful .you must not ride too fast.A:OK,bye bye
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
what r u doing?would like to join ue?can i join u when i come back in about half an hour?where r u going?and he has made it
扫描下载二维码First Name
Sign up now to receive our regular news briefs.
Abbas Advisor: 'Jews Are Thieves'
Netanyahu Meets Maccabi Rishon LeZion
Jerusalem - Startup Capital of Israel
Latest Articles
Connect With Us
First Name
You are here:
Share this Article
Peter Singer, atheistic professor of &Ethics& at Princeton University - pictured here with a strapping, healthy, strong young ram - approves of bestiality and has stated that, &I don't have intrinsic moral taboos.& Photo: Derek Goodwin.
It is axiomatic that in the world of the atheist there is neither morality nor immorality, only amorality. This is often misunderstood to mean that atheists have no values. That conclusion would clearly be erroneous. To associate atheism with amorality is not to say that atheists have no values, amorality is a commentary, not on the existence of values, but on the significance of those values. Since in the atheistic worldview we are nothing more than upright walking primates, our value systems have no more significance than those of our jungle dwelling relatives. In the Darwinian view, the human is to the cockroach as the cockroach is to the paramecium. To imagine that we are something “more”? is just that: a product of the human imagination.
would be absurd then for the atheist to suggest that any particular individual or society has the authority to dictate to all human beings what their values sho it would be even more absurd to suggest that the pronouncements of any individual or society obligates others to behave accordingly. For the atheist, morality is simply a word that is used to describe the type of system that an individual or society subjectively prefers. Each society establishes, maintains, and modifies its values to suit its own needs.
“Morality is the custom of one’s country and the current feeling of one’s peers. Cannibalism is moral in a cannibalistic country.”? (Samuel Butler)
Since these values are nothing more than reflections of the prevalent subjective preferences they obviously will shift and metamorphose to accommodate changing needs and attitudes. In my own lifetime I have witnessed radical societal swings in moral behavior and attitudes regarding marriage and sexuality, homosexuality, the killing of unborn children, euthanasia, and the use of illicit drugs.
One can reasonably predict that as the infatuation with skepticism and atheism grows among the influential “intellectual elite”? of our society, so too will their readiness to embrace more radical changes in moral values. Religious believers expressing dismay and horror at the ominous moral storm clouds looming on the horizon are met with smug derision, hysterical counter-accusations, or utter indifference. There is nothing that atheistic societies are incapable of rationalizing and accepting – including the sexual molestation of children.
No doubt, this assertion will appear preposterous to some atheists, and will spark outrage. Yet the logical and philosophical consequences of atheists’ belief systems are inescapable. When asked by journalist William Crawley if he thought that pedophilia was “just wrong.”? Professor Peter Singer of Princeton University – a world-famous philosopher of “ethics”? – responded as follows:
I don’t have intrinsic moral taboos. My view is not that anything is just wrong…You’re trying to put words in my mouth.”? ()
Singer went on to explain that he is a “consequentialist.”? For the benefit of the philosophically challenged let me explain “consequentialism”? in a nutshell: If you like the consequences it’s ethical, if you don’t like the consequences it’s unethical. Thus, if you enjoy child pornography and having sex with children it’s ethical, if you dislike child pornography and having sex with children it’s unethical. In an article entitled “Heavy Petting,”? Singer likewise gave his stamp of approval to bestiality. As a reward for producing such pearls of wisdom, he has been granted the privilege of teaching our children “ethics”? at an Ivy League university. Moreover, he is by no means the only atheistic philosopher industriously engaged in greasing the precarious slope on which Western society totters. Hence, my “plea”? to atheists, for the philosophical groundwork for the acceptance of pedophilia has already been put in place by such philosophers.
Joel Marks, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the U. of New Haven, who for 10 years authored the “Moral Moments”? column in Philosophy Now, made the following, rather shocking about-face in a 2010 article entitled, “An Amoral Manifesto.”?
“This philosopher has been laboring under an unexamined assumption, namely that there is such a thing as right and wrong. I now believe there isn’t…The long and short of it is that I became convinced that athei and since I am an atheist, I must therefore embrace amorality…I experienced my shocking epiphany that religious fundame without God there is no morality. But they are incorrect, I still believe, about there being a God. Hence, I believe, there is no morality. ()
Marks then quite boldly and candidly addresses the implications of his newfound beliefs:
“Even though words like “sinful”? and “evil”? come naturally to the tongue as say a description of child molesting. They do not describe any actual properties of anything. There are no literal sins in the world because there is no literal God…nothing is literally right or wrong because there is no Morality…yet we human beings can still discover plenty of completely naturally explainable resources for motivating certain preferences. Thus enough of us are sufficiently averse to the molestation of children and would likely continue to be…
At this point the utter intellectual (and moral) bankruptcy of Marks’ position becomes apparent. After correctly concluding that a world without God is free from the shackles of the illusory concepts of morality and immorality, he pathetically attempts to have his cake and eat it too by suggesting that there is something “good”? or “better”? about the preference to being averse to child molestation. One does not know whether to laugh or cry at this dismally transparent exercise in grasping at straws. Isn’t that very point the entire difference between “preference”? and “morality?”?
The recognition that there is something inherently and intrinsically abominable in child molestation renders the act immoral, rather than merely not to one’s taste. Morality implies that there are principles of behavior that are part of the ve principles which Dr. Marks understands can only have significance if they come from God. Preference, on the other hand, is subjective and notoriously capricious. As in: I prefer chocolate ice-cream over vanilla. I prefer jazz to hip-hop. I prefer that people have sex with adults instead of children and the family pet.
However, as Dr. Marks acknowledges, others have different preferences, no less valid than his own. Dr. John Money of Johns Hopkins University proclaims: “If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or twelve who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is genuinely totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual…then I would not call it pathological in any way.”?
(In view of his professional opinion, I wonder how many neighbors are courageous enough to arrange play-dates for their children at the Money residence.)
On August 17, 2011 a symposium sponsored by an association of mental health professionals called B4U-ACT took place in Baltimore, Md. The official brochure declared:
“This day long symposium will facilitate the exchange of ideas among researchers, scholars, mental health practitioners, and minor-attracted persons who have an interest in critical issues surrounding the entry for pedophilia in the Diagnostic Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association.”?
In plain English, this is a symposium whose goal is to facilitate the removal of Pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Societies official list of Mental Disorders (DSM). B4U-ACT has already coined a bland, innocuous, and inoffensive term to make the idea of child-sex more palatable: “minor-attracted persons.“?
This phrase sounds almost pleasant, distinctly unlike those nasty and soon-to-be-politically-incorrect words like “pedophile”? and “child molester.”? (How does pedophobic grab you?) Not surprisingly, the featured speaker is Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University, a colleague of Dr. John Money. Child advocate, Dr. Judith Reisman disclosed that the conference is part of a strategy to condition people into accepting pedophiles: “The first thing they do is to get the public to divest from thinking of what the offender does criminally, to thinking of his emotional state…to empathize and sympathize…You don’t change the nation in one fell swoop, you have to change it by conditioning.”?
Although first published nearly two decades ago, a special issue of The Journal of Homosexuality called “Male Intergenerational Intimacy”? edited by three prestigious scholars (all PhD’s) gives us a taste of what is to come:
“In contemporary Western society, intimate sexual relations between men and boys are considered as immoral…regardless of the emotional contexts in which they occur [not according to Joel Marks and Peter Singer!]…the current social climate makes it rather difficult to look at these relationships in an objective way…man-boy relationships are not uncommon. As in homosexuality, man-boy sexuality occurs and not seldom in a context in which both partners consent…in these relationships a diversity of feelings are or can be expressed: affection, attachment, desire, domination and submission…men who feel attracted to boys have to legitimize their feelings toward themselves as well as towards society.”?
All we are missing now is a scholarly “scientific”? study which informs us that we have finally isolated a “man-child attraction”? gene! An old German expression comes to mind: “So fangt es immer an”?- “It always starts in the same way.”? What also comes to mind are the lyrics of an old protest song from the 60’s: “And you tell me over and over again my friend, you don’t believe we’re on the eve of destruction?”?
The atheistic notion that life emerged randomly from ancient Earth’s prebiotic slime, coupled with the Darwinian belief that humans are no more than intelligent chimpanzees, leaves us morally bereft. In a society whose schools consider it a noble undertaking to teach a teenage boy how to use a condom, but streng verboten to teach him that God has forbidden us to steal or murder, how can one anticipate anything other than a gaping and ever-expanding moral sinkhole? While there exist real challenges in determining exactly what God requires of us in the moral sphere, let us, at least, agree on the following before it is too late, and move forward from there:
All men are created in the image of God and are therefore inherently and intrinsically precious.
All men have been endowed by God with unalienable rights and among these are the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Thou shalt not murder.
Thou shalt not steal.
Thou shalt not bear false witness.
Thou shalt not commit adultery, incest, or bestiality.
Thou shalt not have sex with children, and if you do you will be looked upon as a disgusting and contemptible criminal and will be treated as such.
Thou shall teach these laws to your children.
We hold these above truths to be self-evident, not by proxy of some pragmatic social contract that can be amended and revised as often as societal whim and convenience demands, not as the result of the pompous and vapid philosophical musings of so called professors of “ethics,”? but because they reflect the eternal, immutable, and absolute moral laws that emanate from Almighty God, the Creator of the universe and all mankind.
A wise man once observed that while belief in God after the Holocaust may be difficult, belief in man after the Holocaust is impossible. The choices before us are clear: we will either seek a transcendent moral law to which we will all submit, or we will seek our own personal and societal indulgence. If we turn to God in our quest to create a moral and just world, we ha if not, we are doomed to spiral into the man-made hell of the human jungle.
Rabbi Moshe Averick is an orthodox rabbi and author of Nonsense of a High Order: The Confused and Illusory World of the Atheist. It is available on
and Kindle. Rabbi Averick can be reached via his website at
its clear the religious r desperate losing it to our atheist higher morals witch even go beyond that of their vile and evil massmurdering god..and their own conduct as can be red in history books and seen and red every day on the tele and internet.
time to outlaw religion for what it is , a vile and evil fashist terrorist and criminal organisation
Leave a Reply
Please note: comments may be published in the Algemeiner print edition. Comments written in all caps will be deleted.
An after-school cybersecurity training program for Israeli high school students is looking to expand its recruitment to include younger kids, Slate reported on Wednesday. The program, Magshimim, which was specifically designed to enlist 10th-12th-ers from underrepresented and underprivileged backgrounds, is now seeking eighth- and ninth-graders, and hopes to increase the number of students from approximately 400 students to 4,800 over the next five years. Applicants undergo a series of tests and interviews before being accepted into Magshimim, which targets teens who show a “strong academic potential and computer aptitude, as well [&]
Yeshiva University rabbinical student Akiva Neuman decided to keep his kippah, his tsitsit and his shirt on while competing on NBC’s “American Ninja Warrior.” The 25-year-old, who lives in Queens, is 5’6″ tall and weighs 150 pounds, but he wanted to show that he had large abilities. “I was representing the Jewish people and I wear my yarmulke when I play sports, so I thought this shouldn’t be any different,” he said. Neuman said that while his goal was to [&]
In the upcoming film Imperium, British-Jewish actor Daniel Radcliffe — best known for his role as Harry Potter in the movie series — plays an undercover FBI agent infiltrating a neo-Nazi group. In the film’s trailer, released on Tuesday, Radcliffe is seen shaving his head and reading books about white supremacy, before joining the radical, right-wing terrorist group that the FBI is trying to take down. The trailer, in which swastikas and other Hitler-related images appear, gives a glimpse of Radcliffe’s character blending in to the ranks of the fascist gang. The movie [&]
A pair of Orthodox-Jewish beat-boxers wowed judges and viewers on Tuesday night with an unlikely performance on America’s Got Talent. Ilan “The Aleph Bass” Swartz-Brownstein and Josh “The Orthobox” Leviton performed to Meghan Trainor’s All About That Bass. Though at first appearing skeptical, all four judges glowingly praised the beat-boxing duo by the end of their act and voted them on to the next round. Simon Cowell called the performance “cute” and added, “I actually like you guys. It’s good and fun.” Fellow judge [&]
The last time I was at Nostrand Avenue and Lincoln Place in Brooklyn was probably in the early 1970s in the backseat of my father’s car. In the days before Google Maps and Waze, my father would rely on experience and instinct in deciding the quickest route back to our home near Marine Park. Crown Heights has changed exponentially over the last 40 years. Gone is the fear Crown Heights is now host and home to some of [&]
The music video for Jewish rapper Kosha Dillz’s song Dodging Bullets, which features reggae singer Matisyahu, premiered on Tuesday. In the video, the artists belt the track from a desert. It ends with clips from a concert performance of the song, which has a different meaning for both Jewish artists. “When Matis wrote the hook, it first sounded like ‘dodging bullets’ from war, but I soon learned it was a metaphor for personal relationships,” Dillz told Billboard. “For me, the song has come to [&]
After supporters of the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement failed to pressure rock superstar Carlos Santana into cancelling his upcoming concert in Tel Aivv, the guitarist said in a video message on Thursday that he is excited to return to Israel and promote a “musical message of peace, love and an end to conflict.” “The band and I will bring our open hearts and musical energy that will resonate with your soul long after the last song has been [&]
British rock band Coldplay started its set at the Glastonburg Festival on Sunday by broadcasting excerpts of the iconic speech Charlie Chaplin delivered in The Great Dictator, the 1940 political satire in which the famous filmmaker/movie star played a Jewish barber. “I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be an emperor. That’s not my business. I don’t want to rule or conquer anyone,” Chaplin begins his address. “I should like to help everyone, if possible, Jew, Gentile, black man, white. We all want to help one [&]My dad asked me _____ on the road, it is too dangerous.
A.not play B.to not play C.not playing D.not to play
我是基佬EC46AD
为您推荐：
扫描下载二维码}